Cargando…

Evaluation of enamel thickness of mandibular incisors

OBJECTIVE: To measure enamel thickness at the proximal surfaces of the mandibular incisors, using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) scans. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-one single-rooted mandibular incisors were selected and analyzed according to anatomical characteristics, to form three groups: Gr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: KONSTANTINIDOU, Elisavet, ARAUJO, Eustaquio, MCCRAY, Julie, UENO, Hiroshi, SCHNEIDER, Patricia Pigatto, FOLEY, Patrick Francis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dental Press International 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10229113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37255131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.28.2.e2321149.oar
_version_ 1785051170071379968
author KONSTANTINIDOU, Elisavet
ARAUJO, Eustaquio
MCCRAY, Julie
UENO, Hiroshi
SCHNEIDER, Patricia Pigatto
FOLEY, Patrick Francis
author_facet KONSTANTINIDOU, Elisavet
ARAUJO, Eustaquio
MCCRAY, Julie
UENO, Hiroshi
SCHNEIDER, Patricia Pigatto
FOLEY, Patrick Francis
author_sort KONSTANTINIDOU, Elisavet
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To measure enamel thickness at the proximal surfaces of the mandibular incisors, using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) scans. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-one single-rooted mandibular incisors were selected and analyzed according to anatomical characteristics, to form three groups: Group 1 - central incisors (n = 18); Group 2 - right lateral incisors (n = 10); and Group 3 - left lateral incisors (n = 13). First, enamel thickness at the proximal contact areas of the mandibular incisors was measured. Second, the mesial and distal surfaces of the lateral incisors were compared. Finally, the relationship between the tooth width and the mean enamel thickness was determined. Each tooth was scanned with a micro-CT scanner, and the image was processed with SCANCO micro-CT onboard analysis software. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in mean enamel thickness between the mesial and distal surfaces for each lateral incisor, or between contralateral lateral incisors. In all surfaces analyzed, the upper zones had statistically significantly thinner enamel (0.52 ± 0.10 mm) when compared to the middle and lower zones (0.60 ± 0.08 mm and 0.59 ± 0.08 mm, respectively). There was no correlation (r =0.07) between enamel thickness of the mandibular incisor and the tooth width. CONCLUSIONS: The enamel thickness of the mandibular incisors is similar on the mesial and distal surfaces, with the thinnest layer located at the upper zone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10229113
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Dental Press International
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102291132023-05-31 Evaluation of enamel thickness of mandibular incisors KONSTANTINIDOU, Elisavet ARAUJO, Eustaquio MCCRAY, Julie UENO, Hiroshi SCHNEIDER, Patricia Pigatto FOLEY, Patrick Francis Dental Press J Orthod Original Article OBJECTIVE: To measure enamel thickness at the proximal surfaces of the mandibular incisors, using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) scans. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-one single-rooted mandibular incisors were selected and analyzed according to anatomical characteristics, to form three groups: Group 1 - central incisors (n = 18); Group 2 - right lateral incisors (n = 10); and Group 3 - left lateral incisors (n = 13). First, enamel thickness at the proximal contact areas of the mandibular incisors was measured. Second, the mesial and distal surfaces of the lateral incisors were compared. Finally, the relationship between the tooth width and the mean enamel thickness was determined. Each tooth was scanned with a micro-CT scanner, and the image was processed with SCANCO micro-CT onboard analysis software. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in mean enamel thickness between the mesial and distal surfaces for each lateral incisor, or between contralateral lateral incisors. In all surfaces analyzed, the upper zones had statistically significantly thinner enamel (0.52 ± 0.10 mm) when compared to the middle and lower zones (0.60 ± 0.08 mm and 0.59 ± 0.08 mm, respectively). There was no correlation (r =0.07) between enamel thickness of the mandibular incisor and the tooth width. CONCLUSIONS: The enamel thickness of the mandibular incisors is similar on the mesial and distal surfaces, with the thinnest layer located at the upper zone. Dental Press International 2023-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10229113/ /pubmed/37255131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.28.2.e2321149.oar Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Original Article
KONSTANTINIDOU, Elisavet
ARAUJO, Eustaquio
MCCRAY, Julie
UENO, Hiroshi
SCHNEIDER, Patricia Pigatto
FOLEY, Patrick Francis
Evaluation of enamel thickness of mandibular incisors
title Evaluation of enamel thickness of mandibular incisors
title_full Evaluation of enamel thickness of mandibular incisors
title_fullStr Evaluation of enamel thickness of mandibular incisors
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of enamel thickness of mandibular incisors
title_short Evaluation of enamel thickness of mandibular incisors
title_sort evaluation of enamel thickness of mandibular incisors
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10229113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37255131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.28.2.e2321149.oar
work_keys_str_mv AT konstantinidouelisavet evaluationofenamelthicknessofmandibularincisors
AT araujoeustaquio evaluationofenamelthicknessofmandibularincisors
AT mccrayjulie evaluationofenamelthicknessofmandibularincisors
AT uenohiroshi evaluationofenamelthicknessofmandibularincisors
AT schneiderpatriciapigatto evaluationofenamelthicknessofmandibularincisors
AT foleypatrickfrancis evaluationofenamelthicknessofmandibularincisors