Cargando…
Evaluation of enamel thickness of mandibular incisors
OBJECTIVE: To measure enamel thickness at the proximal surfaces of the mandibular incisors, using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) scans. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-one single-rooted mandibular incisors were selected and analyzed according to anatomical characteristics, to form three groups: Gr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dental Press International
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10229113/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37255131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.28.2.e2321149.oar |
_version_ | 1785051170071379968 |
---|---|
author | KONSTANTINIDOU, Elisavet ARAUJO, Eustaquio MCCRAY, Julie UENO, Hiroshi SCHNEIDER, Patricia Pigatto FOLEY, Patrick Francis |
author_facet | KONSTANTINIDOU, Elisavet ARAUJO, Eustaquio MCCRAY, Julie UENO, Hiroshi SCHNEIDER, Patricia Pigatto FOLEY, Patrick Francis |
author_sort | KONSTANTINIDOU, Elisavet |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To measure enamel thickness at the proximal surfaces of the mandibular incisors, using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) scans. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-one single-rooted mandibular incisors were selected and analyzed according to anatomical characteristics, to form three groups: Group 1 - central incisors (n = 18); Group 2 - right lateral incisors (n = 10); and Group 3 - left lateral incisors (n = 13). First, enamel thickness at the proximal contact areas of the mandibular incisors was measured. Second, the mesial and distal surfaces of the lateral incisors were compared. Finally, the relationship between the tooth width and the mean enamel thickness was determined. Each tooth was scanned with a micro-CT scanner, and the image was processed with SCANCO micro-CT onboard analysis software. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in mean enamel thickness between the mesial and distal surfaces for each lateral incisor, or between contralateral lateral incisors. In all surfaces analyzed, the upper zones had statistically significantly thinner enamel (0.52 ± 0.10 mm) when compared to the middle and lower zones (0.60 ± 0.08 mm and 0.59 ± 0.08 mm, respectively). There was no correlation (r =0.07) between enamel thickness of the mandibular incisor and the tooth width. CONCLUSIONS: The enamel thickness of the mandibular incisors is similar on the mesial and distal surfaces, with the thinnest layer located at the upper zone. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10229113 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Dental Press International |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102291132023-05-31 Evaluation of enamel thickness of mandibular incisors KONSTANTINIDOU, Elisavet ARAUJO, Eustaquio MCCRAY, Julie UENO, Hiroshi SCHNEIDER, Patricia Pigatto FOLEY, Patrick Francis Dental Press J Orthod Original Article OBJECTIVE: To measure enamel thickness at the proximal surfaces of the mandibular incisors, using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) scans. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-one single-rooted mandibular incisors were selected and analyzed according to anatomical characteristics, to form three groups: Group 1 - central incisors (n = 18); Group 2 - right lateral incisors (n = 10); and Group 3 - left lateral incisors (n = 13). First, enamel thickness at the proximal contact areas of the mandibular incisors was measured. Second, the mesial and distal surfaces of the lateral incisors were compared. Finally, the relationship between the tooth width and the mean enamel thickness was determined. Each tooth was scanned with a micro-CT scanner, and the image was processed with SCANCO micro-CT onboard analysis software. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in mean enamel thickness between the mesial and distal surfaces for each lateral incisor, or between contralateral lateral incisors. In all surfaces analyzed, the upper zones had statistically significantly thinner enamel (0.52 ± 0.10 mm) when compared to the middle and lower zones (0.60 ± 0.08 mm and 0.59 ± 0.08 mm, respectively). There was no correlation (r =0.07) between enamel thickness of the mandibular incisor and the tooth width. CONCLUSIONS: The enamel thickness of the mandibular incisors is similar on the mesial and distal surfaces, with the thinnest layer located at the upper zone. Dental Press International 2023-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10229113/ /pubmed/37255131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.28.2.e2321149.oar Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License |
spellingShingle | Original Article KONSTANTINIDOU, Elisavet ARAUJO, Eustaquio MCCRAY, Julie UENO, Hiroshi SCHNEIDER, Patricia Pigatto FOLEY, Patrick Francis Evaluation of enamel thickness of mandibular incisors |
title | Evaluation of enamel thickness of mandibular incisors |
title_full | Evaluation of enamel thickness of mandibular incisors |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of enamel thickness of mandibular incisors |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of enamel thickness of mandibular incisors |
title_short | Evaluation of enamel thickness of mandibular incisors |
title_sort | evaluation of enamel thickness of mandibular incisors |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10229113/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37255131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.28.2.e2321149.oar |
work_keys_str_mv | AT konstantinidouelisavet evaluationofenamelthicknessofmandibularincisors AT araujoeustaquio evaluationofenamelthicknessofmandibularincisors AT mccrayjulie evaluationofenamelthicknessofmandibularincisors AT uenohiroshi evaluationofenamelthicknessofmandibularincisors AT schneiderpatriciapigatto evaluationofenamelthicknessofmandibularincisors AT foleypatrickfrancis evaluationofenamelthicknessofmandibularincisors |