Cargando…

Prospective randomized multicenter noninferiority clinical trial evaluating the use of TFN-advanced(TM) proximal femoral nailing system (TFNA) for the treatment of proximal femur fracture in a Chinese population

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether the 24-weeks postoperative fracture union rate for the investigational TFNA intramedullary nail was non-inferior compared to the control product PFNA-II. METHODS: The study was a prospective, randomized, single-blind, noninferiority dual-arm study drawing from 9 trauma c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Lidan, Pan, Zhijun, Zheng, Xiaohui, Wang, Qiugen, Tang, Peifu, Zhou, Fang, Liu, Fan, Yu, Bin, Leung, Frankie K. L., Wu, Alex, Hughson, Suzanne, Chen, Zhuo, Blauth, Michael, Rosner, Anthony, Sparks, Charisse, Wang, Manyi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10229738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36780014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-023-02231-x
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To evaluate whether the 24-weeks postoperative fracture union rate for the investigational TFNA intramedullary nail was non-inferior compared to the control product PFNA-II. METHODS: The study was a prospective, randomized, single-blind, noninferiority dual-arm study drawing from 9 trauma centers across China, between November 2018 and September 2020, with follow-up measurements at 24 weeks after internal fixation. The full analysis data set (FAS [Intent-to-Treat]) was analyzed and is summarized here. The primary outcome was fracture union rate, a composite score combining clinical and radiographic assessment. Secondary endpoints comprised (a) clinical outcomes including (1) SF-12, (2) Harris Hip, and (3) EQ-5D Scores, (b) radiographic incidence of complications such as loosening or cut-out requiring revision, (c) revision rates, (d) reoperation rates, and (e) adverse events, including 24-weeks revision and reoperation rates. RESULTS: Both TFNA and PFNA-II group fracture healing rates were 100% at 24 weeks; TFNA was therefore shown to be non-inferior to PFNA-II. With baseline data matched in all parameters except age in both the TFNA and PFNA-II groups, comparisons of union rates, SF-12, Harris Hip, and EQ-5D Scores yielded p values > 0.05 indicating no significant difference between the two groups, further supporting the noninferiority of TFNA. In both groups, revision and re-operation rates were 0, and the incidences of serious adverse events were 19.4% and 17.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In terms of fracture union rate at 24 weeks, the DePuy Synthes Trochanteric Fixation Nail Advanced (TFNA) was not inferior to the marketed Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA-II) device produced by the same manufacturer. Secondary and safety outcomes showed no significant differences between the two groups. REGISTRATION: Registration was completed at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03635320.