Cargando…

Hidden blind spot and pseudofixation loss

BACKGROUND: Correct mapping of the blind spot is important, as it serves as an estimate of fixation reliability. When the blind spot is not seen in the expected location in Humphrey visual field (HVF) printout, the clinician should give a thought to why this might be the case. PURPOSE: This video de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Mansoori, Tarannum
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10229976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36872757
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_2843_22
_version_ 1785051406938406912
author Mansoori, Tarannum
author_facet Mansoori, Tarannum
author_sort Mansoori, Tarannum
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Correct mapping of the blind spot is important, as it serves as an estimate of fixation reliability. When the blind spot is not seen in the expected location in Humphrey visual field (HVF) printout, the clinician should give a thought to why this might be the case. PURPOSE: This video describes a series of cases, in which due to different reasons the blind spot could not be seen in the presumed expected location in the grayscale and numeric data of the HVF printout and the possible explanation behind this. SYNOPSIS: When interpreting perimetry results, it is important to know whether the field test is reliable or not. A stimulus presented at the location of physiologic blind spot should not be seen by a patient with a steady fixation in Heijl–Krakau method. Responses will also occur, however, if the patient has a tendency for false-positive responses, or when the blind spot of the properly fixing eye is not in the location where the test stimulus is presented, because of anatomic variation, or if the patient’s head is tilted while performing the test. HIGHLIGHTS: Perimetrist should recognize these potential artifact, during the test and relocate the blind spot. In case, such results are seen after finishing the test, it is recommended for the clinician to repeat the test. Video link: https://youtu.be/I1gxmMWqDQA Key words: Humphrey visual field, Blind spot mapping, False positive response
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10229976
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102299762023-06-01 Hidden blind spot and pseudofixation loss Mansoori, Tarannum Indian J Ophthalmol IJO Videos BACKGROUND: Correct mapping of the blind spot is important, as it serves as an estimate of fixation reliability. When the blind spot is not seen in the expected location in Humphrey visual field (HVF) printout, the clinician should give a thought to why this might be the case. PURPOSE: This video describes a series of cases, in which due to different reasons the blind spot could not be seen in the presumed expected location in the grayscale and numeric data of the HVF printout and the possible explanation behind this. SYNOPSIS: When interpreting perimetry results, it is important to know whether the field test is reliable or not. A stimulus presented at the location of physiologic blind spot should not be seen by a patient with a steady fixation in Heijl–Krakau method. Responses will also occur, however, if the patient has a tendency for false-positive responses, or when the blind spot of the properly fixing eye is not in the location where the test stimulus is presented, because of anatomic variation, or if the patient’s head is tilted while performing the test. HIGHLIGHTS: Perimetrist should recognize these potential artifact, during the test and relocate the blind spot. In case, such results are seen after finishing the test, it is recommended for the clinician to repeat the test. Video link: https://youtu.be/I1gxmMWqDQA Key words: Humphrey visual field, Blind spot mapping, False positive response Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-03 2023-03-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10229976/ /pubmed/36872757 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_2843_22 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle IJO Videos
Mansoori, Tarannum
Hidden blind spot and pseudofixation loss
title Hidden blind spot and pseudofixation loss
title_full Hidden blind spot and pseudofixation loss
title_fullStr Hidden blind spot and pseudofixation loss
title_full_unstemmed Hidden blind spot and pseudofixation loss
title_short Hidden blind spot and pseudofixation loss
title_sort hidden blind spot and pseudofixation loss
topic IJO Videos
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10229976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36872757
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_2843_22
work_keys_str_mv AT mansooritarannum hiddenblindspotandpseudofixationloss