Cargando…
Loop technique for guidewire manipulation during endoscopic ultrasound‐guided hepaticogastrostomy
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS‐HGS) is widely used in the management of biliary obstructions; however, literature on guidewire manipulation is lacking. This study aimed to assess the utility and optimal conditions of the loop technique for guidewire manipul...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10230106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37265928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12903 |
_version_ | 1785051445619326976 |
---|---|
author | Miwa, Haruo Sugimori, Kazuya Matsuoka, Yuto Endo, Kazuki Oishi, Ritsuko Nishimura, Masaki Tozuka, Yuichiro Kaneko, Takashi Numata, Kazushi Maeda, Shin |
author_facet | Miwa, Haruo Sugimori, Kazuya Matsuoka, Yuto Endo, Kazuki Oishi, Ritsuko Nishimura, Masaki Tozuka, Yuichiro Kaneko, Takashi Numata, Kazushi Maeda, Shin |
author_sort | Miwa, Haruo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS‐HGS) is widely used in the management of biliary obstructions; however, literature on guidewire manipulation is lacking. This study aimed to assess the utility and optimal conditions of the loop technique for guidewire manipulation during EUS‐HGS. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent EUS‐HGS between April 2015 and January 2022 were included in this study. Patient characteristics and procedural details were retrospectively analyzed. Guidewire manipulations were classified as conventional technique or loop technique, based on the shape of the guidewire tip. RESULTS: A total of 52 patients (Median age: 73 years, 38 male and 14 female) underwent EUS‐HGS. The median guidewire insertion time was 49 s and the median overall procedure time was 20.5 min. The initial guidewire direction was toward the peripheral side in 23 patients (44%). Technical success rate of the EUS‐HGS was 100%. Twenty patients (38%) underwent the procedure using the loop technique and 32 (62%) with the conventional technique. In the logistic regression analysis, an angle between the bile duct and needle of >70° was independently associated with use of the loop technique (OR 9.84; 95% CI: 2.24–43.13; P <0.01). CONCLUSION: This study revealed the utility of the loop technique in EUS‐HGS. This technique is recommended if the bile duct is punctured at an angle >70°. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10230106 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102301062023-06-01 Loop technique for guidewire manipulation during endoscopic ultrasound‐guided hepaticogastrostomy Miwa, Haruo Sugimori, Kazuya Matsuoka, Yuto Endo, Kazuki Oishi, Ritsuko Nishimura, Masaki Tozuka, Yuichiro Kaneko, Takashi Numata, Kazushi Maeda, Shin JGH Open Original Articles BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS‐HGS) is widely used in the management of biliary obstructions; however, literature on guidewire manipulation is lacking. This study aimed to assess the utility and optimal conditions of the loop technique for guidewire manipulation during EUS‐HGS. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent EUS‐HGS between April 2015 and January 2022 were included in this study. Patient characteristics and procedural details were retrospectively analyzed. Guidewire manipulations were classified as conventional technique or loop technique, based on the shape of the guidewire tip. RESULTS: A total of 52 patients (Median age: 73 years, 38 male and 14 female) underwent EUS‐HGS. The median guidewire insertion time was 49 s and the median overall procedure time was 20.5 min. The initial guidewire direction was toward the peripheral side in 23 patients (44%). Technical success rate of the EUS‐HGS was 100%. Twenty patients (38%) underwent the procedure using the loop technique and 32 (62%) with the conventional technique. In the logistic regression analysis, an angle between the bile duct and needle of >70° was independently associated with use of the loop technique (OR 9.84; 95% CI: 2.24–43.13; P <0.01). CONCLUSION: This study revealed the utility of the loop technique in EUS‐HGS. This technique is recommended if the bile duct is punctured at an angle >70°. Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd 2023-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10230106/ /pubmed/37265928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12903 Text en © 2023 The Authors. JGH Open published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Miwa, Haruo Sugimori, Kazuya Matsuoka, Yuto Endo, Kazuki Oishi, Ritsuko Nishimura, Masaki Tozuka, Yuichiro Kaneko, Takashi Numata, Kazushi Maeda, Shin Loop technique for guidewire manipulation during endoscopic ultrasound‐guided hepaticogastrostomy |
title | Loop technique for guidewire manipulation during endoscopic ultrasound‐guided hepaticogastrostomy |
title_full | Loop technique for guidewire manipulation during endoscopic ultrasound‐guided hepaticogastrostomy |
title_fullStr | Loop technique for guidewire manipulation during endoscopic ultrasound‐guided hepaticogastrostomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Loop technique for guidewire manipulation during endoscopic ultrasound‐guided hepaticogastrostomy |
title_short | Loop technique for guidewire manipulation during endoscopic ultrasound‐guided hepaticogastrostomy |
title_sort | loop technique for guidewire manipulation during endoscopic ultrasound‐guided hepaticogastrostomy |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10230106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37265928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.12903 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT miwaharuo looptechniqueforguidewiremanipulationduringendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomy AT sugimorikazuya looptechniqueforguidewiremanipulationduringendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomy AT matsuokayuto looptechniqueforguidewiremanipulationduringendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomy AT endokazuki looptechniqueforguidewiremanipulationduringendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomy AT oishiritsuko looptechniqueforguidewiremanipulationduringendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomy AT nishimuramasaki looptechniqueforguidewiremanipulationduringendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomy AT tozukayuichiro looptechniqueforguidewiremanipulationduringendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomy AT kanekotakashi looptechniqueforguidewiremanipulationduringendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomy AT numatakazushi looptechniqueforguidewiremanipulationduringendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomy AT maedashin looptechniqueforguidewiremanipulationduringendoscopicultrasoundguidedhepaticogastrostomy |