Cargando…
A Comparison of the Toxicities in Patients With Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancers Treated With Concomitant Boost Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Chemoradiation
Purpose: To compare the objective and patient-reported toxicities of concomitant boost radiotherapy (CBRT) and concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers. Methods and material: In this prospective study, 46 patients with histologically proven stage III-IV...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10230179/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37266055 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38362 |
_version_ | 1785051467633131520 |
---|---|
author | Sharma, Ritu Vats, Siddharth Seam, Rajeev Gupta, Manish Negi, Ratti R Fotedar, Vikas Singh, Kaalindi |
author_facet | Sharma, Ritu Vats, Siddharth Seam, Rajeev Gupta, Manish Negi, Ratti R Fotedar, Vikas Singh, Kaalindi |
author_sort | Sharma, Ritu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: To compare the objective and patient-reported toxicities of concomitant boost radiotherapy (CBRT) and concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers. Methods and material: In this prospective study, 46 patients with histologically proven stage III-IVA head and neck cancer were randomly assigned to receive either concurrent chemoradiation to a dose of 66 Gy in 33 fractions over 6.5 weeks with concurrent cisplatin (40 mg/m2 IV weekly; control arm) or accelerated radiotherapy with concomitant boost radiotherapy (study arm) to a dose of 67.5 Gy in 40 fractions in five weeks. Acute toxicity was evaluated using RTOG toxicity criteria. The assessment was done weekly after initiation of treatment, at the first follow-up (six weeks), and at three months. The four main patient-reported symptoms of pain, hoarseness of voice, dryness of mouth, and loss of taste were also compared between the two groups to assess patient quality of life during treatment. Results: The mean treatment duration was 37 days in the CBRT arm and 49 days in the CRT arm. Treatment-related interruptions were less in the study group,17.3% in the study, and 27.2% in the control with insignificant P-value. Grade III laryngeal toxicity was significantly higher in the study group (P=0.029). Other acute grade I-III toxicities (pharyngeal, skin, mucositis, and salivary) were comparable in both CRT and CBRT arms. Grade IV toxicities were seen only in the CBRT arm but were resolved at the first follow-up. Haematological toxicities and renal toxicities were significantly higher in the CRT arm, with significant P-values of 0.0004 and 0.018, respectively. Conclusion: In patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer, concomitant boost radiotherapy is well tolerated with acceptable local toxicity and minimal systemic toxicity as compared to conventional chemoradiation. It is a feasible option for patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer not fit for concurrent chemoradiation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10230179 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102301792023-06-01 A Comparison of the Toxicities in Patients With Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancers Treated With Concomitant Boost Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Chemoradiation Sharma, Ritu Vats, Siddharth Seam, Rajeev Gupta, Manish Negi, Ratti R Fotedar, Vikas Singh, Kaalindi Cureus Oncology Purpose: To compare the objective and patient-reported toxicities of concomitant boost radiotherapy (CBRT) and concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers. Methods and material: In this prospective study, 46 patients with histologically proven stage III-IVA head and neck cancer were randomly assigned to receive either concurrent chemoradiation to a dose of 66 Gy in 33 fractions over 6.5 weeks with concurrent cisplatin (40 mg/m2 IV weekly; control arm) or accelerated radiotherapy with concomitant boost radiotherapy (study arm) to a dose of 67.5 Gy in 40 fractions in five weeks. Acute toxicity was evaluated using RTOG toxicity criteria. The assessment was done weekly after initiation of treatment, at the first follow-up (six weeks), and at three months. The four main patient-reported symptoms of pain, hoarseness of voice, dryness of mouth, and loss of taste were also compared between the two groups to assess patient quality of life during treatment. Results: The mean treatment duration was 37 days in the CBRT arm and 49 days in the CRT arm. Treatment-related interruptions were less in the study group,17.3% in the study, and 27.2% in the control with insignificant P-value. Grade III laryngeal toxicity was significantly higher in the study group (P=0.029). Other acute grade I-III toxicities (pharyngeal, skin, mucositis, and salivary) were comparable in both CRT and CBRT arms. Grade IV toxicities were seen only in the CBRT arm but were resolved at the first follow-up. Haematological toxicities and renal toxicities were significantly higher in the CRT arm, with significant P-values of 0.0004 and 0.018, respectively. Conclusion: In patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer, concomitant boost radiotherapy is well tolerated with acceptable local toxicity and minimal systemic toxicity as compared to conventional chemoradiation. It is a feasible option for patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer not fit for concurrent chemoradiation. Cureus 2023-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10230179/ /pubmed/37266055 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38362 Text en Copyright © 2023, Sharma et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Sharma, Ritu Vats, Siddharth Seam, Rajeev Gupta, Manish Negi, Ratti R Fotedar, Vikas Singh, Kaalindi A Comparison of the Toxicities in Patients With Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancers Treated With Concomitant Boost Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Chemoradiation |
title | A Comparison of the Toxicities in Patients With Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancers Treated With Concomitant Boost Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Chemoradiation |
title_full | A Comparison of the Toxicities in Patients With Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancers Treated With Concomitant Boost Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Chemoradiation |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of the Toxicities in Patients With Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancers Treated With Concomitant Boost Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Chemoradiation |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of the Toxicities in Patients With Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancers Treated With Concomitant Boost Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Chemoradiation |
title_short | A Comparison of the Toxicities in Patients With Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancers Treated With Concomitant Boost Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Chemoradiation |
title_sort | comparison of the toxicities in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers treated with concomitant boost radiotherapy versus conventional chemoradiation |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10230179/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37266055 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38362 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sharmaritu acomparisonofthetoxicitiesinpatientswithlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancerstreatedwithconcomitantboostradiotherapyversusconventionalchemoradiation AT vatssiddharth acomparisonofthetoxicitiesinpatientswithlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancerstreatedwithconcomitantboostradiotherapyversusconventionalchemoradiation AT seamrajeev acomparisonofthetoxicitiesinpatientswithlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancerstreatedwithconcomitantboostradiotherapyversusconventionalchemoradiation AT guptamanish acomparisonofthetoxicitiesinpatientswithlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancerstreatedwithconcomitantboostradiotherapyversusconventionalchemoradiation AT negirattir acomparisonofthetoxicitiesinpatientswithlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancerstreatedwithconcomitantboostradiotherapyversusconventionalchemoradiation AT fotedarvikas acomparisonofthetoxicitiesinpatientswithlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancerstreatedwithconcomitantboostradiotherapyversusconventionalchemoradiation AT singhkaalindi acomparisonofthetoxicitiesinpatientswithlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancerstreatedwithconcomitantboostradiotherapyversusconventionalchemoradiation AT sharmaritu comparisonofthetoxicitiesinpatientswithlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancerstreatedwithconcomitantboostradiotherapyversusconventionalchemoradiation AT vatssiddharth comparisonofthetoxicitiesinpatientswithlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancerstreatedwithconcomitantboostradiotherapyversusconventionalchemoradiation AT seamrajeev comparisonofthetoxicitiesinpatientswithlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancerstreatedwithconcomitantboostradiotherapyversusconventionalchemoradiation AT guptamanish comparisonofthetoxicitiesinpatientswithlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancerstreatedwithconcomitantboostradiotherapyversusconventionalchemoradiation AT negirattir comparisonofthetoxicitiesinpatientswithlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancerstreatedwithconcomitantboostradiotherapyversusconventionalchemoradiation AT fotedarvikas comparisonofthetoxicitiesinpatientswithlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancerstreatedwithconcomitantboostradiotherapyversusconventionalchemoradiation AT singhkaalindi comparisonofthetoxicitiesinpatientswithlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancerstreatedwithconcomitantboostradiotherapyversusconventionalchemoradiation |