Cargando…
Retrospective evaluation of factors affecting successful fit testing of respiratory protective equipment during the early phase of COVID-19
OBJECTIVES: Respiratory protective equipment is critical to protect healthcare workers from COVID-19 infection, which includes filtering facepiece respirators (FFP3). There are reports of fitting issues within healthcare workers, although the factors affecting fitting outcomes are largely unknown. T...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10230346/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37230519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065068 |
_version_ | 1785051509021474816 |
---|---|
author | Caggiari, Silvia Bader, Dan Packman, Zoe Robinson, Jane Tranka, Sumeshni Böhning, Dankmar Worsley, Peter |
author_facet | Caggiari, Silvia Bader, Dan Packman, Zoe Robinson, Jane Tranka, Sumeshni Böhning, Dankmar Worsley, Peter |
author_sort | Caggiari, Silvia |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Respiratory protective equipment is critical to protect healthcare workers from COVID-19 infection, which includes filtering facepiece respirators (FFP3). There are reports of fitting issues within healthcare workers, although the factors affecting fitting outcomes are largely unknown. This study aimed to evaluate factors affecting respirator fitting outcomes. DESIGN: This is a retrospective evaluation study. We conducted a secondary analysis of a national database of fit testing outcomes in England between July and August 2020. SETTINGS: The study involves National Health Service (NHS) hospitals in England. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 9592 observations regarding fit test outcomes from 5604 healthcare workers were included in the analysis. INTERVENTION: Fit testing of FFP3 on a cohort of healthcare workers in England, working in the NHS. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measure was the fit testing result, that is, pass or fail with a specific respirator. Key demographics, including age, gender, ethnicity and face measurements of 5604 healthcare workers, were used to compare fitting outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 9592 observations from 5604 healthcare workers were included in the analysis. A mixed-effects logistic regression model was used to determine the factors which affected fit testing outcome. Results showed that males experienced a significantly (p<0.05) higher fit test success than females (OR 1.51; 95% CI 1.27 to 1.81). Those with non-white ethnicities demonstrated significantly lower odds of successful respirator fitting; black (OR 0.65; 95% CI 0.51 to 0.83), Asian (OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.74) and mixed (OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.79. CONCLUSION: During the early phase of COVID-19, females and non-white ethnicities were less likely to have a successful respirator fitting. Further research is needed to design new respirators which provide equal opportunity for comfortable, effective fitting of these devices. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10230346 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102303462023-06-01 Retrospective evaluation of factors affecting successful fit testing of respiratory protective equipment during the early phase of COVID-19 Caggiari, Silvia Bader, Dan Packman, Zoe Robinson, Jane Tranka, Sumeshni Böhning, Dankmar Worsley, Peter BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: Respiratory protective equipment is critical to protect healthcare workers from COVID-19 infection, which includes filtering facepiece respirators (FFP3). There are reports of fitting issues within healthcare workers, although the factors affecting fitting outcomes are largely unknown. This study aimed to evaluate factors affecting respirator fitting outcomes. DESIGN: This is a retrospective evaluation study. We conducted a secondary analysis of a national database of fit testing outcomes in England between July and August 2020. SETTINGS: The study involves National Health Service (NHS) hospitals in England. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 9592 observations regarding fit test outcomes from 5604 healthcare workers were included in the analysis. INTERVENTION: Fit testing of FFP3 on a cohort of healthcare workers in England, working in the NHS. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measure was the fit testing result, that is, pass or fail with a specific respirator. Key demographics, including age, gender, ethnicity and face measurements of 5604 healthcare workers, were used to compare fitting outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 9592 observations from 5604 healthcare workers were included in the analysis. A mixed-effects logistic regression model was used to determine the factors which affected fit testing outcome. Results showed that males experienced a significantly (p<0.05) higher fit test success than females (OR 1.51; 95% CI 1.27 to 1.81). Those with non-white ethnicities demonstrated significantly lower odds of successful respirator fitting; black (OR 0.65; 95% CI 0.51 to 0.83), Asian (OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.74) and mixed (OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.79. CONCLUSION: During the early phase of COVID-19, females and non-white ethnicities were less likely to have a successful respirator fitting. Further research is needed to design new respirators which provide equal opportunity for comfortable, effective fitting of these devices. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10230346/ /pubmed/37230519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065068 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Caggiari, Silvia Bader, Dan Packman, Zoe Robinson, Jane Tranka, Sumeshni Böhning, Dankmar Worsley, Peter Retrospective evaluation of factors affecting successful fit testing of respiratory protective equipment during the early phase of COVID-19 |
title | Retrospective evaluation of factors affecting successful fit testing of respiratory protective equipment during the early phase of COVID-19 |
title_full | Retrospective evaluation of factors affecting successful fit testing of respiratory protective equipment during the early phase of COVID-19 |
title_fullStr | Retrospective evaluation of factors affecting successful fit testing of respiratory protective equipment during the early phase of COVID-19 |
title_full_unstemmed | Retrospective evaluation of factors affecting successful fit testing of respiratory protective equipment during the early phase of COVID-19 |
title_short | Retrospective evaluation of factors affecting successful fit testing of respiratory protective equipment during the early phase of COVID-19 |
title_sort | retrospective evaluation of factors affecting successful fit testing of respiratory protective equipment during the early phase of covid-19 |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10230346/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37230519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065068 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caggiarisilvia retrospectiveevaluationoffactorsaffectingsuccessfulfittestingofrespiratoryprotectiveequipmentduringtheearlyphaseofcovid19 AT baderdan retrospectiveevaluationoffactorsaffectingsuccessfulfittestingofrespiratoryprotectiveequipmentduringtheearlyphaseofcovid19 AT packmanzoe retrospectiveevaluationoffactorsaffectingsuccessfulfittestingofrespiratoryprotectiveequipmentduringtheearlyphaseofcovid19 AT robinsonjane retrospectiveevaluationoffactorsaffectingsuccessfulfittestingofrespiratoryprotectiveequipmentduringtheearlyphaseofcovid19 AT trankasumeshni retrospectiveevaluationoffactorsaffectingsuccessfulfittestingofrespiratoryprotectiveequipmentduringtheearlyphaseofcovid19 AT bohningdankmar retrospectiveevaluationoffactorsaffectingsuccessfulfittestingofrespiratoryprotectiveequipmentduringtheearlyphaseofcovid19 AT worsleypeter retrospectiveevaluationoffactorsaffectingsuccessfulfittestingofrespiratoryprotectiveequipmentduringtheearlyphaseofcovid19 |