Cargando…

The dosimetric underpinning of bladder filling criteria for prostate image-guided volumetric modulated arc therapy

OBJECTIVES: Repeated CT simulation imaging is common at our institution due to failure to achieve acceptable bladder filling in patients undergoing prostate radiotherapy. There is operational value in re-assessing the validity of the bladder filling assessment criteria by comparing the quality of tw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kong, Vickie, Dang, Jennifer, Wan, Vanessa, Rosewall, Tara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Institute of Radiology. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10230381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37086060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20230020
_version_ 1785051515631697920
author Kong, Vickie
Dang, Jennifer
Wan, Vanessa
Rosewall, Tara
author_facet Kong, Vickie
Dang, Jennifer
Wan, Vanessa
Rosewall, Tara
author_sort Kong, Vickie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Repeated CT simulation imaging is common at our institution due to failure to achieve acceptable bladder filling in patients undergoing prostate radiotherapy. There is operational value in re-assessing the validity of the bladder filling assessment criteria by comparing the quality of two plans optimized based on either an “Accepted” or “Rejected” bladder status. METHODS: Twenty prostate patients with repeated CT simulation imaging were included. For each patient, a VMAT plan created using the “Rejected” bladder was compared with the “Accepted” bladder plan. Then, delivered dose to bladder was estimated using ≥4 CBCTs to measure number of fractions with major bladderdose violation (>5% difference) for both plans. Bladder heights of fractions without major bladder dose violations were compared to those with a violation to determine a threshold height for bladder filling acceptability. RESULTS: Using the “Accepted” bladder plans for treatment resulted in 30/175 fractions with major dose violations. These 30 bladders were significantly shorter than those without major violation (mean 28 vs 43mm, p < 0.05). The “Rejected” bladder plans delivered a lower dose to the bladder by ≥5% than the ‘“Accepted” bladder plans in 59% of fractions, and the number of fractions with major dose violations was 17. CONCLUSIONS: Using a shorter bladder for plan optimization resulted in better bladder sparing during treatment and improved compliance to protocol specific bladder dose constraints. A bladder height range of 20–40 mm measured between the bladder dome and the superior aspect of the symphysis pubis is recommended for prostate radiotherapy requiring a full bladder protocol. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Using real patient data from simulation and treatment, this study established a range of bladder height that can be measured easily in a clinical setting for assessing adequacy of bladder filling for prostate radiotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10230381
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The British Institute of Radiology.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102303812023-06-01 The dosimetric underpinning of bladder filling criteria for prostate image-guided volumetric modulated arc therapy Kong, Vickie Dang, Jennifer Wan, Vanessa Rosewall, Tara Br J Radiol Full Paper OBJECTIVES: Repeated CT simulation imaging is common at our institution due to failure to achieve acceptable bladder filling in patients undergoing prostate radiotherapy. There is operational value in re-assessing the validity of the bladder filling assessment criteria by comparing the quality of two plans optimized based on either an “Accepted” or “Rejected” bladder status. METHODS: Twenty prostate patients with repeated CT simulation imaging were included. For each patient, a VMAT plan created using the “Rejected” bladder was compared with the “Accepted” bladder plan. Then, delivered dose to bladder was estimated using ≥4 CBCTs to measure number of fractions with major bladderdose violation (>5% difference) for both plans. Bladder heights of fractions without major bladder dose violations were compared to those with a violation to determine a threshold height for bladder filling acceptability. RESULTS: Using the “Accepted” bladder plans for treatment resulted in 30/175 fractions with major dose violations. These 30 bladders were significantly shorter than those without major violation (mean 28 vs 43mm, p < 0.05). The “Rejected” bladder plans delivered a lower dose to the bladder by ≥5% than the ‘“Accepted” bladder plans in 59% of fractions, and the number of fractions with major dose violations was 17. CONCLUSIONS: Using a shorter bladder for plan optimization resulted in better bladder sparing during treatment and improved compliance to protocol specific bladder dose constraints. A bladder height range of 20–40 mm measured between the bladder dome and the superior aspect of the symphysis pubis is recommended for prostate radiotherapy requiring a full bladder protocol. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Using real patient data from simulation and treatment, this study established a range of bladder height that can be measured easily in a clinical setting for assessing adequacy of bladder filling for prostate radiotherapy. The British Institute of Radiology. 2023-06-01 2023-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10230381/ /pubmed/37086060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20230020 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted non-commercial reuse, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Full Paper
Kong, Vickie
Dang, Jennifer
Wan, Vanessa
Rosewall, Tara
The dosimetric underpinning of bladder filling criteria for prostate image-guided volumetric modulated arc therapy
title The dosimetric underpinning of bladder filling criteria for prostate image-guided volumetric modulated arc therapy
title_full The dosimetric underpinning of bladder filling criteria for prostate image-guided volumetric modulated arc therapy
title_fullStr The dosimetric underpinning of bladder filling criteria for prostate image-guided volumetric modulated arc therapy
title_full_unstemmed The dosimetric underpinning of bladder filling criteria for prostate image-guided volumetric modulated arc therapy
title_short The dosimetric underpinning of bladder filling criteria for prostate image-guided volumetric modulated arc therapy
title_sort dosimetric underpinning of bladder filling criteria for prostate image-guided volumetric modulated arc therapy
topic Full Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10230381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37086060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20230020
work_keys_str_mv AT kongvickie thedosimetricunderpinningofbladderfillingcriteriaforprostateimageguidedvolumetricmodulatedarctherapy
AT dangjennifer thedosimetricunderpinningofbladderfillingcriteriaforprostateimageguidedvolumetricmodulatedarctherapy
AT wanvanessa thedosimetricunderpinningofbladderfillingcriteriaforprostateimageguidedvolumetricmodulatedarctherapy
AT rosewalltara thedosimetricunderpinningofbladderfillingcriteriaforprostateimageguidedvolumetricmodulatedarctherapy
AT kongvickie dosimetricunderpinningofbladderfillingcriteriaforprostateimageguidedvolumetricmodulatedarctherapy
AT dangjennifer dosimetricunderpinningofbladderfillingcriteriaforprostateimageguidedvolumetricmodulatedarctherapy
AT wanvanessa dosimetricunderpinningofbladderfillingcriteriaforprostateimageguidedvolumetricmodulatedarctherapy
AT rosewalltara dosimetricunderpinningofbladderfillingcriteriaforprostateimageguidedvolumetricmodulatedarctherapy