Cargando…
Prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy: quantifying intra-fraction motion and calculating margins using the new BIR geometric uncertainties in daily online IGRT recommendations
OBJECTIVES: To measure the magnitude of intra-fraction prostate motion (IFPM) during stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) delivered without intra-fraction tracking. To assess if current margins adequately cover IFPM. To derive margins using new guidelines. METHODS: IFPM was determined in 20 patients rec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The British Institute of Radiology.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10230383/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37001054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20220852 |
_version_ | 1785051516144451584 |
---|---|
author | McNeice, Joseph M Sanilkumar, Nandu Alexander, Sophie E Talbot, James Tree, Alison C McNair, Helen A |
author_facet | McNeice, Joseph M Sanilkumar, Nandu Alexander, Sophie E Talbot, James Tree, Alison C McNair, Helen A |
author_sort | McNeice, Joseph M |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To measure the magnitude of intra-fraction prostate motion (IFPM) during stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) delivered without intra-fraction tracking. To assess if current margins adequately cover IFPM. To derive margins using new guidelines. METHODS: IFPM was determined in 20 patients receiving 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions using 97 pairs of pre- and post-treatment cone beam CT (CBCT) scans. Correlation of time between CBCT acquisitions and motion was determined. The magnitude of IFPM was compared to current margins (6 mm isotropic, 3 mm posterior). Margins were calculated using IFPM alone and updated guidelines. RESULTS: The averaged 3D root mean square IFPM was 2.5 mm (4.2 mm). Independent prostate motion was predominantly posterior (70%) and inferior (63%). There was weak correlation between posterior (ρ = 0.38) and inferior (ρ = 0.36) IFPM and time. IFPM greater than current margins occurred in 8 of 97 fractions, six in the posterior direction. Margins were ≤3.5 mm using IFPM alone and ≤3.3 mm Left 3.5 mm Right, 7.0 mm inferior, 3.7 mm superior, 4.4 mm anterior and 3.3 mm posterior using new guidelines, compensating for motion in 92% of fractions. CONCLUSIONS: Our current SBRT margins account for 92% of IFPM, predominantly posterior and inferior. Although updated guidelines suggest an increase in margins inferiorly, any increase must be balanced against the possibility of increased toxicity, particularly if biochemical control and side-effects are favourable with current practice. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The difference between current clinical margins and those determined using updated guidance is demonstrated. The implications must be considered against clinical outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10230383 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | The British Institute of Radiology. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102303832023-06-01 Prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy: quantifying intra-fraction motion and calculating margins using the new BIR geometric uncertainties in daily online IGRT recommendations McNeice, Joseph M Sanilkumar, Nandu Alexander, Sophie E Talbot, James Tree, Alison C McNair, Helen A Br J Radiol Full Paper OBJECTIVES: To measure the magnitude of intra-fraction prostate motion (IFPM) during stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) delivered without intra-fraction tracking. To assess if current margins adequately cover IFPM. To derive margins using new guidelines. METHODS: IFPM was determined in 20 patients receiving 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions using 97 pairs of pre- and post-treatment cone beam CT (CBCT) scans. Correlation of time between CBCT acquisitions and motion was determined. The magnitude of IFPM was compared to current margins (6 mm isotropic, 3 mm posterior). Margins were calculated using IFPM alone and updated guidelines. RESULTS: The averaged 3D root mean square IFPM was 2.5 mm (4.2 mm). Independent prostate motion was predominantly posterior (70%) and inferior (63%). There was weak correlation between posterior (ρ = 0.38) and inferior (ρ = 0.36) IFPM and time. IFPM greater than current margins occurred in 8 of 97 fractions, six in the posterior direction. Margins were ≤3.5 mm using IFPM alone and ≤3.3 mm Left 3.5 mm Right, 7.0 mm inferior, 3.7 mm superior, 4.4 mm anterior and 3.3 mm posterior using new guidelines, compensating for motion in 92% of fractions. CONCLUSIONS: Our current SBRT margins account for 92% of IFPM, predominantly posterior and inferior. Although updated guidelines suggest an increase in margins inferiorly, any increase must be balanced against the possibility of increased toxicity, particularly if biochemical control and side-effects are favourable with current practice. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The difference between current clinical margins and those determined using updated guidance is demonstrated. The implications must be considered against clinical outcomes. The British Institute of Radiology. 2023-06-01 2023-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10230383/ /pubmed/37001054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20220852 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Full Paper McNeice, Joseph M Sanilkumar, Nandu Alexander, Sophie E Talbot, James Tree, Alison C McNair, Helen A Prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy: quantifying intra-fraction motion and calculating margins using the new BIR geometric uncertainties in daily online IGRT recommendations |
title | Prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy: quantifying intra-fraction motion and calculating margins using the new BIR geometric uncertainties in daily online IGRT recommendations |
title_full | Prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy: quantifying intra-fraction motion and calculating margins using the new BIR geometric uncertainties in daily online IGRT recommendations |
title_fullStr | Prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy: quantifying intra-fraction motion and calculating margins using the new BIR geometric uncertainties in daily online IGRT recommendations |
title_full_unstemmed | Prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy: quantifying intra-fraction motion and calculating margins using the new BIR geometric uncertainties in daily online IGRT recommendations |
title_short | Prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy: quantifying intra-fraction motion and calculating margins using the new BIR geometric uncertainties in daily online IGRT recommendations |
title_sort | prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy: quantifying intra-fraction motion and calculating margins using the new bir geometric uncertainties in daily online igrt recommendations |
topic | Full Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10230383/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37001054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20220852 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcneicejosephm prostatestereotacticbodyradiotherapyquantifyingintrafractionmotionandcalculatingmarginsusingthenewbirgeometricuncertaintiesindailyonlineigrtrecommendations AT sanilkumarnandu prostatestereotacticbodyradiotherapyquantifyingintrafractionmotionandcalculatingmarginsusingthenewbirgeometricuncertaintiesindailyonlineigrtrecommendations AT alexandersophiee prostatestereotacticbodyradiotherapyquantifyingintrafractionmotionandcalculatingmarginsusingthenewbirgeometricuncertaintiesindailyonlineigrtrecommendations AT talbotjames prostatestereotacticbodyradiotherapyquantifyingintrafractionmotionandcalculatingmarginsusingthenewbirgeometricuncertaintiesindailyonlineigrtrecommendations AT treealisonc prostatestereotacticbodyradiotherapyquantifyingintrafractionmotionandcalculatingmarginsusingthenewbirgeometricuncertaintiesindailyonlineigrtrecommendations AT mcnairhelena prostatestereotacticbodyradiotherapyquantifyingintrafractionmotionandcalculatingmarginsusingthenewbirgeometricuncertaintiesindailyonlineigrtrecommendations |