Cargando…

Efficacy of CytoSorb®: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: Cytokine adsorption using the CytoSorb® adsorber has been proposed in various clinical settings including sepsis, ARDS, hyperinflammatory syndromes, cardiac surgery or recovery after cardiac arrest. The aim of this analysis is to provide evidence for the efficacy of the CytoSorb® adsor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Becker, Sören, Lang, Hannah, Vollmer Barbosa, Clara, Tian, Zhejia, Melk, Anette, Schmidt, Bernhard M. W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10230475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37259160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04492-9
_version_ 1785051537888772096
author Becker, Sören
Lang, Hannah
Vollmer Barbosa, Clara
Tian, Zhejia
Melk, Anette
Schmidt, Bernhard M. W.
author_facet Becker, Sören
Lang, Hannah
Vollmer Barbosa, Clara
Tian, Zhejia
Melk, Anette
Schmidt, Bernhard M. W.
author_sort Becker, Sören
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Cytokine adsorption using the CytoSorb® adsorber has been proposed in various clinical settings including sepsis, ARDS, hyperinflammatory syndromes, cardiac surgery or recovery after cardiac arrest. The aim of this analysis is to provide evidence for the efficacy of the CytoSorb® adsorber with regard to mortality in various settings. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library database and the database provided by Cytosorbents™ (01.1.2010–29.5.2022). We considered randomized controlled trials and observational studies with control groups. The longest reported mortality was defined as the primary endpoint. We computed risk ratios and 95%-confidence intervals and used DerSimonian and Lairds random effects model. We analysed all studies combined and divided them into the subgroups: sepsis, cardiopulmonary bypass surgery (CPB), other severe illness, SARS-CoV-2 infection and recovery from cardiac arrest. The meta-analysis was registered in advance (PROSPERO: CRD42022290334). RESULTS: Of an initial 1295 publications, 34 studies were found eligible, including 1297 patients treated with CytoSorb® and 1314 controls. Cytosorb® intervention did not lower mortality (RR [95%-CI]: all studies 1.07 [0.88; 1.31], sepsis 0.98 [0.74; 1.31], CPB surgery 0.91 [0.64; 1.29], severe illness 0.95 [0.59; 1.55], SARS-CoV-2 1.58 [0.50; 4.94]). In patients with cardiac arrest, we found a significant survival advantage of the untreated controls (1.22 [1.02; 1.46]). We did not find significant differences in ICU length of stay, lactate levels, or IL-6 levels after treatment. Of the eligible 34 studies only 12 were randomized controlled trials. All observational studies showed moderate to serious risk of bias. INTERPRETATION: To date, there is no evidence for a positive effect of the CytoSorb® adsorber on mortality across a variety of diagnoses that justifies its widespread use in intensive care medicine. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-023-04492-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10230475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102304752023-06-01 Efficacy of CytoSorb®: a systematic review and meta-analysis Becker, Sören Lang, Hannah Vollmer Barbosa, Clara Tian, Zhejia Melk, Anette Schmidt, Bernhard M. W. Crit Care Research INTRODUCTION: Cytokine adsorption using the CytoSorb® adsorber has been proposed in various clinical settings including sepsis, ARDS, hyperinflammatory syndromes, cardiac surgery or recovery after cardiac arrest. The aim of this analysis is to provide evidence for the efficacy of the CytoSorb® adsorber with regard to mortality in various settings. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library database and the database provided by Cytosorbents™ (01.1.2010–29.5.2022). We considered randomized controlled trials and observational studies with control groups. The longest reported mortality was defined as the primary endpoint. We computed risk ratios and 95%-confidence intervals and used DerSimonian and Lairds random effects model. We analysed all studies combined and divided them into the subgroups: sepsis, cardiopulmonary bypass surgery (CPB), other severe illness, SARS-CoV-2 infection and recovery from cardiac arrest. The meta-analysis was registered in advance (PROSPERO: CRD42022290334). RESULTS: Of an initial 1295 publications, 34 studies were found eligible, including 1297 patients treated with CytoSorb® and 1314 controls. Cytosorb® intervention did not lower mortality (RR [95%-CI]: all studies 1.07 [0.88; 1.31], sepsis 0.98 [0.74; 1.31], CPB surgery 0.91 [0.64; 1.29], severe illness 0.95 [0.59; 1.55], SARS-CoV-2 1.58 [0.50; 4.94]). In patients with cardiac arrest, we found a significant survival advantage of the untreated controls (1.22 [1.02; 1.46]). We did not find significant differences in ICU length of stay, lactate levels, or IL-6 levels after treatment. Of the eligible 34 studies only 12 were randomized controlled trials. All observational studies showed moderate to serious risk of bias. INTERPRETATION: To date, there is no evidence for a positive effect of the CytoSorb® adsorber on mortality across a variety of diagnoses that justifies its widespread use in intensive care medicine. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-023-04492-9. BioMed Central 2023-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10230475/ /pubmed/37259160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04492-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Becker, Sören
Lang, Hannah
Vollmer Barbosa, Clara
Tian, Zhejia
Melk, Anette
Schmidt, Bernhard M. W.
Efficacy of CytoSorb®: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Efficacy of CytoSorb®: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy of CytoSorb®: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy of CytoSorb®: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of CytoSorb®: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy of CytoSorb®: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy of cytosorb®: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10230475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37259160
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04492-9
work_keys_str_mv AT beckersoren efficacyofcytosorbasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT langhannah efficacyofcytosorbasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vollmerbarbosaclara efficacyofcytosorbasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tianzhejia efficacyofcytosorbasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT melkanette efficacyofcytosorbasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT schmidtbernhardmw efficacyofcytosorbasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis