Cargando…
Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block versus Bier block for emergency reduction of upper limb injuries: a protocol for an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Closed reduction of upper limb fractures and/or dislocations are common in the emergency department (ED), which involves physically re-aligning the injured part prior to immobilisation. As this is painful, numerous techniques are available to provide regional anaesthesia to ensure patien...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10230709/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37254224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07403-z |
_version_ | 1785051593205350400 |
---|---|
author | Tsao, Henry Tang, Christopher Trembath, Mark Jones, Philip Snelling, Peter J. |
author_facet | Tsao, Henry Tang, Christopher Trembath, Mark Jones, Philip Snelling, Peter J. |
author_sort | Tsao, Henry |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Closed reduction of upper limb fractures and/or dislocations are common in the emergency department (ED), which involves physically re-aligning the injured part prior to immobilisation. As this is painful, numerous techniques are available to provide regional anaesthesia to ensure patient tolerance. A Bier block (BB) is typically performed as part of routine care. An alternative technique gaining interest in the ED is ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block (UGSCB), which involves injecting local anaesthetic around the brachial plexus at the supraclavicular fossa under ultrasound guidance. It is unclear whether UGSCB is effective and safe when performed in the ED. METHODS: SUPERB (SUPraclavicular block for Emergency Reduction versus Bier block) is a prospective open-label, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial that compares the effectiveness of UGSCB versus BB for closed reduction of upper limb fractures and/or dislocations. Adult patients presenting with an upper limb fracture and/or dislocation that requires emergent closed reduction in the ED will be eligible. After screening, participants will be randomised to either UGSCB or BB. Once regional anaesthesia is obtained, closed reduction of the injured part will be performed and appropriately immobilised. The primary outcome is maximal pain experienced during closed reduction measured via a visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes include baseline and post-reduction pain, patient satisfaction, total opioid requirement in ED, ED length of stay, adverse events and regional anaesthesia failure. DISCUSSION: Existing evidence suggests UGSCB is effective when performed in the operating theatre by trained anaesthetists. SUPERB will be the first randomised controlled trial to elucidate the effectiveness and safety of UGSCB in the ED. The findings have the potential to provide an alternative safe and effective option for the management of upper extremity emergencies in the ED. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial has been registered on 21 October 2022 with Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12622001356752). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10230709 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102307092023-06-01 Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block versus Bier block for emergency reduction of upper limb injuries: a protocol for an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial Tsao, Henry Tang, Christopher Trembath, Mark Jones, Philip Snelling, Peter J. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Closed reduction of upper limb fractures and/or dislocations are common in the emergency department (ED), which involves physically re-aligning the injured part prior to immobilisation. As this is painful, numerous techniques are available to provide regional anaesthesia to ensure patient tolerance. A Bier block (BB) is typically performed as part of routine care. An alternative technique gaining interest in the ED is ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block (UGSCB), which involves injecting local anaesthetic around the brachial plexus at the supraclavicular fossa under ultrasound guidance. It is unclear whether UGSCB is effective and safe when performed in the ED. METHODS: SUPERB (SUPraclavicular block for Emergency Reduction versus Bier block) is a prospective open-label, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial that compares the effectiveness of UGSCB versus BB for closed reduction of upper limb fractures and/or dislocations. Adult patients presenting with an upper limb fracture and/or dislocation that requires emergent closed reduction in the ED will be eligible. After screening, participants will be randomised to either UGSCB or BB. Once regional anaesthesia is obtained, closed reduction of the injured part will be performed and appropriately immobilised. The primary outcome is maximal pain experienced during closed reduction measured via a visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes include baseline and post-reduction pain, patient satisfaction, total opioid requirement in ED, ED length of stay, adverse events and regional anaesthesia failure. DISCUSSION: Existing evidence suggests UGSCB is effective when performed in the operating theatre by trained anaesthetists. SUPERB will be the first randomised controlled trial to elucidate the effectiveness and safety of UGSCB in the ED. The findings have the potential to provide an alternative safe and effective option for the management of upper extremity emergencies in the ED. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial has been registered on 21 October 2022 with Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12622001356752). BioMed Central 2023-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10230709/ /pubmed/37254224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07403-z Text en © Crown 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Tsao, Henry Tang, Christopher Trembath, Mark Jones, Philip Snelling, Peter J. Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block versus Bier block for emergency reduction of upper limb injuries: a protocol for an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial |
title | Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block versus Bier block for emergency reduction of upper limb injuries: a protocol for an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block versus Bier block for emergency reduction of upper limb injuries: a protocol for an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block versus Bier block for emergency reduction of upper limb injuries: a protocol for an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block versus Bier block for emergency reduction of upper limb injuries: a protocol for an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block versus Bier block for emergency reduction of upper limb injuries: a protocol for an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block versus bier block for emergency reduction of upper limb injuries: a protocol for an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10230709/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37254224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07403-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tsaohenry ultrasoundguidedsupraclavicularblockversusbierblockforemergencyreductionofupperlimbinjuriesaprotocolforanopenlabelnoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT tangchristopher ultrasoundguidedsupraclavicularblockversusbierblockforemergencyreductionofupperlimbinjuriesaprotocolforanopenlabelnoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT trembathmark ultrasoundguidedsupraclavicularblockversusbierblockforemergencyreductionofupperlimbinjuriesaprotocolforanopenlabelnoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT jonesphilip ultrasoundguidedsupraclavicularblockversusbierblockforemergencyreductionofupperlimbinjuriesaprotocolforanopenlabelnoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT snellingpeterj ultrasoundguidedsupraclavicularblockversusbierblockforemergencyreductionofupperlimbinjuriesaprotocolforanopenlabelnoninferiorityrandomisedcontrolledtrial |