Cargando…
Chemoradiation for oesophageal cancer: the choice of treatment modality
BACKGROUND: Locally advanced oesophageal cancer can be treated with definitive chemoradiation (dCRT) or with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery (nCRT + S), but treatment modality choice is not always clear. The aim of this study was to investigate the factors associated with the choice o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10230716/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37259100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-023-02290-9 |
_version_ | 1785051594962763776 |
---|---|
author | Kitti, Pauliina M. Faltinova, Maria Kauppi, Juha Räsänen, Jari Saarto, Tiina Seppälä, Tiina Anttonen, Anu M. |
author_facet | Kitti, Pauliina M. Faltinova, Maria Kauppi, Juha Räsänen, Jari Saarto, Tiina Seppälä, Tiina Anttonen, Anu M. |
author_sort | Kitti, Pauliina M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Locally advanced oesophageal cancer can be treated with definitive chemoradiation (dCRT) or with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery (nCRT + S), but treatment modality choice is not always clear. The aim of this study was to investigate the factors associated with the choice of treatment modality in locally advanced oesophageal cancer. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 149 patients treated with dCRT(n = 85) or nCRT + S (n = 64) for oesophageal cancer in Helsinki University Hospital in 2008–2018. Logistic regression was used to analyse factors associated with choice of treatment modality and to compare dosimetric factors with postoperative complications. Multivariate analyses identified factors associated with survival. RESULTS: Surgery was performed after chemoradiation as planned on 64/91 patients (70%). 28/64 had pathological complete response (44%). Probability of nCRT + S was higher in stages I-III versus IV (OR 3.62, 95% CI 1.53–8.53; P = .003), ECOG 0–1 versus 2 (OR 6.99, 95% CI 1.81–26.96; P = .005) or in the middle/lower vs upper oesophageal tumours (OR 5.61, 95% CI 1.83–17.16, P = .003). Probability for surgery was lower, if patient had lost > 10% of body weight (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.21–0.98, P = 0.043). Patients in the nCRT + S group had significantly better median overall survival (mOS) and local control than the dCRT group (60 vs. 10 months, P < .001 and 53 vs. 6 months, P < 0.0001, respectively). 10/85 (12%) patients died within three months after dCRT. In multivariate analysis, nCRT + S was associated with improved mOS (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.17–0.44, P < .001). Current smokers had worse mOS (HR 2.02, 95% CI 1.04–3.92, P = .037) compared to never-smokers. No significant dosimetric factor associated with postoperative complications was found. CONCLUSION: The overall clinical status of the patients and the stage of the cancer guide the choice of treatment modalities, leading to overtreatment. Patients with better prognoses were more likely operated after chemoradiation, although there is no evidence of OS benefit in previous randomized trials. On the other hand, the prognosis was poor for patients with poor general health and advanced cancers, despite the chemoradiation. Thus, there are signs of overtreatment. MDT practice should be recommended to optimise the choice of treatment modalities. Smoking status is an independent factor associated with survival. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10230716 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102307162023-06-01 Chemoradiation for oesophageal cancer: the choice of treatment modality Kitti, Pauliina M. Faltinova, Maria Kauppi, Juha Räsänen, Jari Saarto, Tiina Seppälä, Tiina Anttonen, Anu M. Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Locally advanced oesophageal cancer can be treated with definitive chemoradiation (dCRT) or with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery (nCRT + S), but treatment modality choice is not always clear. The aim of this study was to investigate the factors associated with the choice of treatment modality in locally advanced oesophageal cancer. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 149 patients treated with dCRT(n = 85) or nCRT + S (n = 64) for oesophageal cancer in Helsinki University Hospital in 2008–2018. Logistic regression was used to analyse factors associated with choice of treatment modality and to compare dosimetric factors with postoperative complications. Multivariate analyses identified factors associated with survival. RESULTS: Surgery was performed after chemoradiation as planned on 64/91 patients (70%). 28/64 had pathological complete response (44%). Probability of nCRT + S was higher in stages I-III versus IV (OR 3.62, 95% CI 1.53–8.53; P = .003), ECOG 0–1 versus 2 (OR 6.99, 95% CI 1.81–26.96; P = .005) or in the middle/lower vs upper oesophageal tumours (OR 5.61, 95% CI 1.83–17.16, P = .003). Probability for surgery was lower, if patient had lost > 10% of body weight (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.21–0.98, P = 0.043). Patients in the nCRT + S group had significantly better median overall survival (mOS) and local control than the dCRT group (60 vs. 10 months, P < .001 and 53 vs. 6 months, P < 0.0001, respectively). 10/85 (12%) patients died within three months after dCRT. In multivariate analysis, nCRT + S was associated with improved mOS (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.17–0.44, P < .001). Current smokers had worse mOS (HR 2.02, 95% CI 1.04–3.92, P = .037) compared to never-smokers. No significant dosimetric factor associated with postoperative complications was found. CONCLUSION: The overall clinical status of the patients and the stage of the cancer guide the choice of treatment modalities, leading to overtreatment. Patients with better prognoses were more likely operated after chemoradiation, although there is no evidence of OS benefit in previous randomized trials. On the other hand, the prognosis was poor for patients with poor general health and advanced cancers, despite the chemoradiation. Thus, there are signs of overtreatment. MDT practice should be recommended to optimise the choice of treatment modalities. Smoking status is an independent factor associated with survival. BioMed Central 2023-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10230716/ /pubmed/37259100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-023-02290-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Kitti, Pauliina M. Faltinova, Maria Kauppi, Juha Räsänen, Jari Saarto, Tiina Seppälä, Tiina Anttonen, Anu M. Chemoradiation for oesophageal cancer: the choice of treatment modality |
title | Chemoradiation for oesophageal cancer: the choice of treatment modality |
title_full | Chemoradiation for oesophageal cancer: the choice of treatment modality |
title_fullStr | Chemoradiation for oesophageal cancer: the choice of treatment modality |
title_full_unstemmed | Chemoradiation for oesophageal cancer: the choice of treatment modality |
title_short | Chemoradiation for oesophageal cancer: the choice of treatment modality |
title_sort | chemoradiation for oesophageal cancer: the choice of treatment modality |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10230716/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37259100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-023-02290-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kittipauliinam chemoradiationforoesophagealcancerthechoiceoftreatmentmodality AT faltinovamaria chemoradiationforoesophagealcancerthechoiceoftreatmentmodality AT kauppijuha chemoradiationforoesophagealcancerthechoiceoftreatmentmodality AT rasanenjari chemoradiationforoesophagealcancerthechoiceoftreatmentmodality AT saartotiina chemoradiationforoesophagealcancerthechoiceoftreatmentmodality AT seppalatiina chemoradiationforoesophagealcancerthechoiceoftreatmentmodality AT anttonenanum chemoradiationforoesophagealcancerthechoiceoftreatmentmodality |