Cargando…

Long-term end-stage renal disease risks after living kidney donation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that donor nephrectomy can induce renal function impairment. However, few meta-analysis studies about this have proceeded. Therefore, the objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis including all data of recent research studies was to determine whether...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Jun Young, Yang, Won Jae, Doo, Seung Whan, Park, Jae Joon, Gwon, Yong Nam, Kim, Ki Min, Kim, Jae Heon, Kim, Do Kyung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10230732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37254087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-023-03208-z
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that donor nephrectomy can induce renal function impairment. However, few meta-analysis studies about this have proceeded. Therefore, the objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis including all data of recent research studies was to determine whether living donor nephrectomy (LDN) could induce renal function impairment. METHODS: By November 2020, comprehensive literature searches were performed on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Inclusion criteria were: (1) observational studies with data about overall end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or chronic kidney disease (CKD) of living kidney donors, (2) control group consisted of people without donor nephrectomy, and (3) outcomes of studies included long-term end-stage renal disease risks after living kidney donation. Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) assessment tool was used to evaluate our methodological quality. RESULTS: The qualitative review included 11 studies and the meta-analysis included 5 studies. In the meta-analysis, the integrated overall ESRD risk was 5.57 (95% CI: 2.03—15.30). Regarding the overall risk of bias using ROBINS-I assessment tool, 0 studies was rated as "Low", 7 studies were rated as "moderate", 2 studies were rated as "Serious", and two studies were rated as "Critical". CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that LDN increased ESRD risk in LDN patients. However, in our meta-analysis, variables in included studies were not uniform and the number of included studies was small. To have a definite conclusion, meta-analyses of well-planned and detailed studies need to be conducted in the future. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12882-023-03208-z.