Cargando…

What matters most? Assessment of within-canopy factors influencing the needle microbiome of the model conifer, Pinus radiata

The assembly and function of the phyllosphere microbiome is important to the overall fitness of plants and, thereby, the ecosystems they inhabit. Presently, model systems for tree phyllosphere microbiome studies are lacking, yet forests resilient to pests, diseases, and climate change are important...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Addison, Sarah, Armstrong, Charlotte, Wigley, Kathryn, Hartley, Robin, Wakelin, Steven
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10230745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37254222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40793-023-00507-8
_version_ 1785051602163335168
author Addison, Sarah
Armstrong, Charlotte
Wigley, Kathryn
Hartley, Robin
Wakelin, Steven
author_facet Addison, Sarah
Armstrong, Charlotte
Wigley, Kathryn
Hartley, Robin
Wakelin, Steven
author_sort Addison, Sarah
collection PubMed
description The assembly and function of the phyllosphere microbiome is important to the overall fitness of plants and, thereby, the ecosystems they inhabit. Presently, model systems for tree phyllosphere microbiome studies are lacking, yet forests resilient to pests, diseases, and climate change are important to support a myriad of ecosystem services impacting from local to global levels. In this study, we extend the development of model microbiome systems for trees species, particularly coniferous gymnosperms, by undertaking a structured approach assessing the phyllosphere microbiome of Pinus radiata. Canopy sampling height was the single most important factor influencing both alpha- and beta-diversity of bacterial and fungal communities (p < 0.005). Bacterial and fungal phyllosphere microbiome richness was lowest in samples from the top of the canopy, subsequently increasing in the middle and then bottom canopy samples. These differences maybe driven by either by (1) exchange of microbiomes with the forest floor and soil with the lower foliage, (2) strong ecological filtering in the upper canopy via environmental exposure (e.g., UV), (3) canopy density, (4) or combinations of factors. Most taxa present in the top canopy were also present lower in tree; as such, sampling strategies focussing on lower canopy sampling should provide good overall phyllosphere microbiome coverage for the tree. The dominant phyllosphere bacteria were Alpha-proteobacteria (Rhizobiales and Sphingomonas) along with Acidobacteria Gp1. However, the P. radiata phyllosphere microbiome samples were fungal dominated. From the top canopy samples, Arthoniomycetes and Dothideomycetes were highly represented, with abundances of Arthoniomycetes then reducing in lower canopy samples whilst abundances of Ascomycota increased. The most abundant fungal taxa were Phaeococcomyces (14.4% of total reads) and Phaeotheca spp. (10.38%). A second-order effect of canopy sampling direction was evident in bacterial community composition (p = 0.01); these directional influences were not evident for fungal communities. However, sterilisation of needles did impact fungal community composition (p = 0.025), indicating potential for community differences in the endosphere versus leaf surface compartments. Needle age was only important in relation to bacterial communities, but was canopy height dependant (interaction p = 0.008). By building an understanding of the primary and secondary factors related to intra-canopy phyllosphere microbiome variation, we provide a sampling framework to either explicitly minimise or capture variation in needle collection to enable ongoing ecological studies targeted at inter-canopy or other experimental levels. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40793-023-00507-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10230745
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102307452023-06-01 What matters most? Assessment of within-canopy factors influencing the needle microbiome of the model conifer, Pinus radiata Addison, Sarah Armstrong, Charlotte Wigley, Kathryn Hartley, Robin Wakelin, Steven Environ Microbiome Research The assembly and function of the phyllosphere microbiome is important to the overall fitness of plants and, thereby, the ecosystems they inhabit. Presently, model systems for tree phyllosphere microbiome studies are lacking, yet forests resilient to pests, diseases, and climate change are important to support a myriad of ecosystem services impacting from local to global levels. In this study, we extend the development of model microbiome systems for trees species, particularly coniferous gymnosperms, by undertaking a structured approach assessing the phyllosphere microbiome of Pinus radiata. Canopy sampling height was the single most important factor influencing both alpha- and beta-diversity of bacterial and fungal communities (p < 0.005). Bacterial and fungal phyllosphere microbiome richness was lowest in samples from the top of the canopy, subsequently increasing in the middle and then bottom canopy samples. These differences maybe driven by either by (1) exchange of microbiomes with the forest floor and soil with the lower foliage, (2) strong ecological filtering in the upper canopy via environmental exposure (e.g., UV), (3) canopy density, (4) or combinations of factors. Most taxa present in the top canopy were also present lower in tree; as such, sampling strategies focussing on lower canopy sampling should provide good overall phyllosphere microbiome coverage for the tree. The dominant phyllosphere bacteria were Alpha-proteobacteria (Rhizobiales and Sphingomonas) along with Acidobacteria Gp1. However, the P. radiata phyllosphere microbiome samples were fungal dominated. From the top canopy samples, Arthoniomycetes and Dothideomycetes were highly represented, with abundances of Arthoniomycetes then reducing in lower canopy samples whilst abundances of Ascomycota increased. The most abundant fungal taxa were Phaeococcomyces (14.4% of total reads) and Phaeotheca spp. (10.38%). A second-order effect of canopy sampling direction was evident in bacterial community composition (p = 0.01); these directional influences were not evident for fungal communities. However, sterilisation of needles did impact fungal community composition (p = 0.025), indicating potential for community differences in the endosphere versus leaf surface compartments. Needle age was only important in relation to bacterial communities, but was canopy height dependant (interaction p = 0.008). By building an understanding of the primary and secondary factors related to intra-canopy phyllosphere microbiome variation, we provide a sampling framework to either explicitly minimise or capture variation in needle collection to enable ongoing ecological studies targeted at inter-canopy or other experimental levels. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40793-023-00507-8. BioMed Central 2023-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10230745/ /pubmed/37254222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40793-023-00507-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Addison, Sarah
Armstrong, Charlotte
Wigley, Kathryn
Hartley, Robin
Wakelin, Steven
What matters most? Assessment of within-canopy factors influencing the needle microbiome of the model conifer, Pinus radiata
title What matters most? Assessment of within-canopy factors influencing the needle microbiome of the model conifer, Pinus radiata
title_full What matters most? Assessment of within-canopy factors influencing the needle microbiome of the model conifer, Pinus radiata
title_fullStr What matters most? Assessment of within-canopy factors influencing the needle microbiome of the model conifer, Pinus radiata
title_full_unstemmed What matters most? Assessment of within-canopy factors influencing the needle microbiome of the model conifer, Pinus radiata
title_short What matters most? Assessment of within-canopy factors influencing the needle microbiome of the model conifer, Pinus radiata
title_sort what matters most? assessment of within-canopy factors influencing the needle microbiome of the model conifer, pinus radiata
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10230745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37254222
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40793-023-00507-8
work_keys_str_mv AT addisonsarah whatmattersmostassessmentofwithincanopyfactorsinfluencingtheneedlemicrobiomeofthemodelconiferpinusradiata
AT armstrongcharlotte whatmattersmostassessmentofwithincanopyfactorsinfluencingtheneedlemicrobiomeofthemodelconiferpinusradiata
AT wigleykathryn whatmattersmostassessmentofwithincanopyfactorsinfluencingtheneedlemicrobiomeofthemodelconiferpinusradiata
AT hartleyrobin whatmattersmostassessmentofwithincanopyfactorsinfluencingtheneedlemicrobiomeofthemodelconiferpinusradiata
AT wakelinsteven whatmattersmostassessmentofwithincanopyfactorsinfluencingtheneedlemicrobiomeofthemodelconiferpinusradiata