Cargando…
EMT/MET plasticity in cancer and Go-or-Grow decisions in quiescence: the two sides of the same coin?
Epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) and mesenchymal epithelial transition (MET) are genetic determinants of cellular plasticity. These programs operate in physiological (embryonic development, wound healing) and pathological (organ fibrosis, cancer) conditions. In cancer, EMT and MET interfere w...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10230810/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37259089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12943-023-01793-z |
_version_ | 1785051616321208320 |
---|---|
author | Akhmetkaliyev, Azamat Alibrahim, Noura Shafiee, Darya Tulchinsky, Eugene |
author_facet | Akhmetkaliyev, Azamat Alibrahim, Noura Shafiee, Darya Tulchinsky, Eugene |
author_sort | Akhmetkaliyev, Azamat |
collection | PubMed |
description | Epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) and mesenchymal epithelial transition (MET) are genetic determinants of cellular plasticity. These programs operate in physiological (embryonic development, wound healing) and pathological (organ fibrosis, cancer) conditions. In cancer, EMT and MET interfere with various signalling pathways at different levels. This results in gross alterations in the gene expression programs, which affect most, if not all hallmarks of cancer, such as response to proliferative and death-inducing signals, tumorigenicity, and cell stemness. EMT in cancer cells involves large scale reorganisation of the cytoskeleton, loss of epithelial integrity, and gain of mesenchymal traits, such as mesenchymal type of cell migration. In this regard, EMT/MET plasticity is highly relevant to the Go-or-Grow concept, which postulates the dichotomous relationship between cell motility and proliferation. The Go-or-Grow decisions are critically important in the processes in which EMT/MET plasticity takes the central stage, mobilisation of stem cells during wound healing, cancer relapse, and metastasis. Here we outline the maintenance of quiescence in stem cell and metastatic niches, focusing on the implication of EMT/MET regulatory networks in Go-or-Grow switches. In particular, we discuss the analogy between cells residing in hybrid quasi-mesenchymal states and G(Alert), an intermediate phase allowing quiescent stem cells to enter the cell cycle rapidly. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10230810 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102308102023-06-01 EMT/MET plasticity in cancer and Go-or-Grow decisions in quiescence: the two sides of the same coin? Akhmetkaliyev, Azamat Alibrahim, Noura Shafiee, Darya Tulchinsky, Eugene Mol Cancer Review Epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) and mesenchymal epithelial transition (MET) are genetic determinants of cellular plasticity. These programs operate in physiological (embryonic development, wound healing) and pathological (organ fibrosis, cancer) conditions. In cancer, EMT and MET interfere with various signalling pathways at different levels. This results in gross alterations in the gene expression programs, which affect most, if not all hallmarks of cancer, such as response to proliferative and death-inducing signals, tumorigenicity, and cell stemness. EMT in cancer cells involves large scale reorganisation of the cytoskeleton, loss of epithelial integrity, and gain of mesenchymal traits, such as mesenchymal type of cell migration. In this regard, EMT/MET plasticity is highly relevant to the Go-or-Grow concept, which postulates the dichotomous relationship between cell motility and proliferation. The Go-or-Grow decisions are critically important in the processes in which EMT/MET plasticity takes the central stage, mobilisation of stem cells during wound healing, cancer relapse, and metastasis. Here we outline the maintenance of quiescence in stem cell and metastatic niches, focusing on the implication of EMT/MET regulatory networks in Go-or-Grow switches. In particular, we discuss the analogy between cells residing in hybrid quasi-mesenchymal states and G(Alert), an intermediate phase allowing quiescent stem cells to enter the cell cycle rapidly. BioMed Central 2023-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10230810/ /pubmed/37259089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12943-023-01793-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Akhmetkaliyev, Azamat Alibrahim, Noura Shafiee, Darya Tulchinsky, Eugene EMT/MET plasticity in cancer and Go-or-Grow decisions in quiescence: the two sides of the same coin? |
title | EMT/MET plasticity in cancer and Go-or-Grow decisions in quiescence: the two sides of the same coin? |
title_full | EMT/MET plasticity in cancer and Go-or-Grow decisions in quiescence: the two sides of the same coin? |
title_fullStr | EMT/MET plasticity in cancer and Go-or-Grow decisions in quiescence: the two sides of the same coin? |
title_full_unstemmed | EMT/MET plasticity in cancer and Go-or-Grow decisions in quiescence: the two sides of the same coin? |
title_short | EMT/MET plasticity in cancer and Go-or-Grow decisions in quiescence: the two sides of the same coin? |
title_sort | emt/met plasticity in cancer and go-or-grow decisions in quiescence: the two sides of the same coin? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10230810/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37259089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12943-023-01793-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT akhmetkaliyevazamat emtmetplasticityincancerandgoorgrowdecisionsinquiescencethetwosidesofthesamecoin AT alibrahimnoura emtmetplasticityincancerandgoorgrowdecisionsinquiescencethetwosidesofthesamecoin AT shafieedarya emtmetplasticityincancerandgoorgrowdecisionsinquiescencethetwosidesofthesamecoin AT tulchinskyeugene emtmetplasticityincancerandgoorgrowdecisionsinquiescencethetwosidesofthesamecoin |