Cargando…

EMT/MET plasticity in cancer and Go-or-Grow decisions in quiescence: the two sides of the same coin?

Epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) and mesenchymal epithelial transition (MET) are genetic determinants of cellular plasticity. These programs operate in physiological (embryonic development, wound healing) and pathological (organ fibrosis, cancer) conditions. In cancer, EMT and MET interfere w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akhmetkaliyev, Azamat, Alibrahim, Noura, Shafiee, Darya, Tulchinsky, Eugene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10230810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37259089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12943-023-01793-z
_version_ 1785051616321208320
author Akhmetkaliyev, Azamat
Alibrahim, Noura
Shafiee, Darya
Tulchinsky, Eugene
author_facet Akhmetkaliyev, Azamat
Alibrahim, Noura
Shafiee, Darya
Tulchinsky, Eugene
author_sort Akhmetkaliyev, Azamat
collection PubMed
description Epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) and mesenchymal epithelial transition (MET) are genetic determinants of cellular plasticity. These programs operate in physiological (embryonic development, wound healing) and pathological (organ fibrosis, cancer) conditions. In cancer, EMT and MET interfere with various signalling pathways at different levels. This results in gross alterations in the gene expression programs, which affect most, if not all hallmarks of cancer, such as response to proliferative and death-inducing signals, tumorigenicity, and cell stemness. EMT in cancer cells involves large scale reorganisation of the cytoskeleton, loss of epithelial integrity, and gain of mesenchymal traits, such as mesenchymal type of cell migration. In this regard, EMT/MET plasticity is highly relevant to the Go-or-Grow concept, which postulates the dichotomous relationship between cell motility and proliferation. The Go-or-Grow decisions are critically important in the processes in which EMT/MET plasticity takes the central stage, mobilisation of stem cells during wound healing, cancer relapse, and metastasis. Here we outline the maintenance of quiescence in stem cell and metastatic niches, focusing on the implication of EMT/MET regulatory networks in Go-or-Grow switches. In particular, we discuss the analogy between cells residing in hybrid quasi-mesenchymal states and G(Alert), an intermediate phase allowing quiescent stem cells to enter the cell cycle rapidly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10230810
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102308102023-06-01 EMT/MET plasticity in cancer and Go-or-Grow decisions in quiescence: the two sides of the same coin? Akhmetkaliyev, Azamat Alibrahim, Noura Shafiee, Darya Tulchinsky, Eugene Mol Cancer Review Epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) and mesenchymal epithelial transition (MET) are genetic determinants of cellular plasticity. These programs operate in physiological (embryonic development, wound healing) and pathological (organ fibrosis, cancer) conditions. In cancer, EMT and MET interfere with various signalling pathways at different levels. This results in gross alterations in the gene expression programs, which affect most, if not all hallmarks of cancer, such as response to proliferative and death-inducing signals, tumorigenicity, and cell stemness. EMT in cancer cells involves large scale reorganisation of the cytoskeleton, loss of epithelial integrity, and gain of mesenchymal traits, such as mesenchymal type of cell migration. In this regard, EMT/MET plasticity is highly relevant to the Go-or-Grow concept, which postulates the dichotomous relationship between cell motility and proliferation. The Go-or-Grow decisions are critically important in the processes in which EMT/MET plasticity takes the central stage, mobilisation of stem cells during wound healing, cancer relapse, and metastasis. Here we outline the maintenance of quiescence in stem cell and metastatic niches, focusing on the implication of EMT/MET regulatory networks in Go-or-Grow switches. In particular, we discuss the analogy between cells residing in hybrid quasi-mesenchymal states and G(Alert), an intermediate phase allowing quiescent stem cells to enter the cell cycle rapidly. BioMed Central 2023-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10230810/ /pubmed/37259089 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12943-023-01793-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Akhmetkaliyev, Azamat
Alibrahim, Noura
Shafiee, Darya
Tulchinsky, Eugene
EMT/MET plasticity in cancer and Go-or-Grow decisions in quiescence: the two sides of the same coin?
title EMT/MET plasticity in cancer and Go-or-Grow decisions in quiescence: the two sides of the same coin?
title_full EMT/MET plasticity in cancer and Go-or-Grow decisions in quiescence: the two sides of the same coin?
title_fullStr EMT/MET plasticity in cancer and Go-or-Grow decisions in quiescence: the two sides of the same coin?
title_full_unstemmed EMT/MET plasticity in cancer and Go-or-Grow decisions in quiescence: the two sides of the same coin?
title_short EMT/MET plasticity in cancer and Go-or-Grow decisions in quiescence: the two sides of the same coin?
title_sort emt/met plasticity in cancer and go-or-grow decisions in quiescence: the two sides of the same coin?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10230810/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37259089
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12943-023-01793-z
work_keys_str_mv AT akhmetkaliyevazamat emtmetplasticityincancerandgoorgrowdecisionsinquiescencethetwosidesofthesamecoin
AT alibrahimnoura emtmetplasticityincancerandgoorgrowdecisionsinquiescencethetwosidesofthesamecoin
AT shafieedarya emtmetplasticityincancerandgoorgrowdecisionsinquiescencethetwosidesofthesamecoin
AT tulchinskyeugene emtmetplasticityincancerandgoorgrowdecisionsinquiescencethetwosidesofthesamecoin