Cargando…

Socioeconomic inequalities in interval colorectal cancer are explained by differences in faecal haemoglobin concentration and age: a register-based cohort study

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the risk of interval colorectal cancer (CRC) in faecal immunochemical test (FIT) negative screening participants according to socioeconomic status. DESIGN: In this register-based study, first round FIT negative (<20 µg hb/g faeces) screening participants (biennial FIT, citi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deding, Ulrik, Kobaek-Larsen, Morten, Bøggild, Henrik, Kaalby, Lasse, Thygesen, Marianne Kirstine, Baatrup, Gunnar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10230874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37230536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001113
_version_ 1785051631175335936
author Deding, Ulrik
Kobaek-Larsen, Morten
Bøggild, Henrik
Kaalby, Lasse
Thygesen, Marianne Kirstine
Baatrup, Gunnar
author_facet Deding, Ulrik
Kobaek-Larsen, Morten
Bøggild, Henrik
Kaalby, Lasse
Thygesen, Marianne Kirstine
Baatrup, Gunnar
author_sort Deding, Ulrik
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To estimate the risk of interval colorectal cancer (CRC) in faecal immunochemical test (FIT) negative screening participants according to socioeconomic status. DESIGN: In this register-based study, first round FIT negative (<20 µg hb/g faeces) screening participants (biennial FIT, citizens aged 50–74) were followed to estimate interval CRC risk. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models estimated HRs based on socioeconomic status defined by educational level and income. Models were adjusted for age, sex and FIT concentration. RESULTS: We identified 829 (0.7‰) interval CRC in 1 160 902 individuals. Interval CRC was more common in lower socioeconomic strata with 0.7‰ for medium-long higher education compared with 1.0‰ for elementary school and 0.4‰ in the highest income quartile compared with 1.2‰ in the lowest. These differences did not translate into significant differences in HR in the multivariate analysis, as they were explained by FIT concentration and age. HR for interval CRC was 7.09 (95% CI) for FIT concentrations 11.9–19.8 µg hb/g faeces, and 3.37 (95% CI) for FIT between 7.2 and 11.8 compared with those <7.2. The HR rose with increasing age ranging from 2.06 (95% CI 1.45 to 2.93) to 7.60 (95% CI 5.63 to 10.25) compared with those under 55 years. CONCLUSION: Interval CRC risk increased with decreasing income, heavily influenced by lower income individuals more often being older and having increased FIT concentrations. Individualising screening interval based on age and FIT result, may decrease interval CRC rates, reduce the social gradient and thereby increase the screening efficiency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10230874
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102308742023-06-01 Socioeconomic inequalities in interval colorectal cancer are explained by differences in faecal haemoglobin concentration and age: a register-based cohort study Deding, Ulrik Kobaek-Larsen, Morten Bøggild, Henrik Kaalby, Lasse Thygesen, Marianne Kirstine Baatrup, Gunnar BMJ Open Gastroenterol Colorectal Cancer OBJECTIVE: To estimate the risk of interval colorectal cancer (CRC) in faecal immunochemical test (FIT) negative screening participants according to socioeconomic status. DESIGN: In this register-based study, first round FIT negative (<20 µg hb/g faeces) screening participants (biennial FIT, citizens aged 50–74) were followed to estimate interval CRC risk. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models estimated HRs based on socioeconomic status defined by educational level and income. Models were adjusted for age, sex and FIT concentration. RESULTS: We identified 829 (0.7‰) interval CRC in 1 160 902 individuals. Interval CRC was more common in lower socioeconomic strata with 0.7‰ for medium-long higher education compared with 1.0‰ for elementary school and 0.4‰ in the highest income quartile compared with 1.2‰ in the lowest. These differences did not translate into significant differences in HR in the multivariate analysis, as they were explained by FIT concentration and age. HR for interval CRC was 7.09 (95% CI) for FIT concentrations 11.9–19.8 µg hb/g faeces, and 3.37 (95% CI) for FIT between 7.2 and 11.8 compared with those <7.2. The HR rose with increasing age ranging from 2.06 (95% CI 1.45 to 2.93) to 7.60 (95% CI 5.63 to 10.25) compared with those under 55 years. CONCLUSION: Interval CRC risk increased with decreasing income, heavily influenced by lower income individuals more often being older and having increased FIT concentrations. Individualising screening interval based on age and FIT result, may decrease interval CRC rates, reduce the social gradient and thereby increase the screening efficiency. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10230874/ /pubmed/37230536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001113 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Colorectal Cancer
Deding, Ulrik
Kobaek-Larsen, Morten
Bøggild, Henrik
Kaalby, Lasse
Thygesen, Marianne Kirstine
Baatrup, Gunnar
Socioeconomic inequalities in interval colorectal cancer are explained by differences in faecal haemoglobin concentration and age: a register-based cohort study
title Socioeconomic inequalities in interval colorectal cancer are explained by differences in faecal haemoglobin concentration and age: a register-based cohort study
title_full Socioeconomic inequalities in interval colorectal cancer are explained by differences in faecal haemoglobin concentration and age: a register-based cohort study
title_fullStr Socioeconomic inequalities in interval colorectal cancer are explained by differences in faecal haemoglobin concentration and age: a register-based cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Socioeconomic inequalities in interval colorectal cancer are explained by differences in faecal haemoglobin concentration and age: a register-based cohort study
title_short Socioeconomic inequalities in interval colorectal cancer are explained by differences in faecal haemoglobin concentration and age: a register-based cohort study
title_sort socioeconomic inequalities in interval colorectal cancer are explained by differences in faecal haemoglobin concentration and age: a register-based cohort study
topic Colorectal Cancer
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10230874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37230536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001113
work_keys_str_mv AT dedingulrik socioeconomicinequalitiesinintervalcolorectalcancerareexplainedbydifferencesinfaecalhaemoglobinconcentrationandagearegisterbasedcohortstudy
AT kobaeklarsenmorten socioeconomicinequalitiesinintervalcolorectalcancerareexplainedbydifferencesinfaecalhaemoglobinconcentrationandagearegisterbasedcohortstudy
AT bøggildhenrik socioeconomicinequalitiesinintervalcolorectalcancerareexplainedbydifferencesinfaecalhaemoglobinconcentrationandagearegisterbasedcohortstudy
AT kaalbylasse socioeconomicinequalitiesinintervalcolorectalcancerareexplainedbydifferencesinfaecalhaemoglobinconcentrationandagearegisterbasedcohortstudy
AT thygesenmariannekirstine socioeconomicinequalitiesinintervalcolorectalcancerareexplainedbydifferencesinfaecalhaemoglobinconcentrationandagearegisterbasedcohortstudy
AT baatrupgunnar socioeconomicinequalitiesinintervalcolorectalcancerareexplainedbydifferencesinfaecalhaemoglobinconcentrationandagearegisterbasedcohortstudy