Cargando…

Mapping the evidence on assessment of fitness to work at heights: a scoping review protocol

INTRODUCTION: Falls from height are a leading cause of serious injury and fatality globally. In South Africa, work at heights is regulated by occupational health and safety legislation, which places responsibility on employers to ensure their workers are fit for high-risk work. There is however no f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Swart, Lyndsey, Claassen, Nicolaas, Buys, Tania
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10230904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37225273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067847
_version_ 1785051638038265856
author Swart, Lyndsey
Claassen, Nicolaas
Buys, Tania
author_facet Swart, Lyndsey
Claassen, Nicolaas
Buys, Tania
author_sort Swart, Lyndsey
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Falls from height are a leading cause of serious injury and fatality globally. In South Africa, work at heights is regulated by occupational health and safety legislation, which places responsibility on employers to ensure their workers are fit for high-risk work. There is however no formal procedure or consensus on how fitness to work at heights should be assessed. This paper presents an a priori protocol for a scoping review that seeks to identify and map the current evidence base around the assessment of fitness to work at heights. It forms the initial phase of a PhD study aimed at developing an interdisciplinary consensus statement for assessing fitness to work at heights in the South African construction industry. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) scoping review framework and will be guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. An iterative search will be conducted in a selection of multidisciplinary databases including, Proquest Central, PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, Web of Science, PsychINFO and Google Scholar. Thereafter, searches for grey literature will be performed in Google.com and websites of various national and international agencies, governing bodies and professional organisations with an interest in occupational health and work at heights. Where appropriate, targeted requests for clarification for further information will be undertaken with information sources. A descriptive qualitative content analysis of the results will be conducted and a level of evidence rating will be assigned to each study using the JBI approach. This will allow us to provide some commentary on the rigour of the existing evidence base. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval for the PhD study was granted by the Research Ethics Committee, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, ethics reference number, 486/2021. Results of the scoping review will be submitted to a scientific journal for publication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This protocol is registered on the Open Science Framework at osf.io/yd5gw.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10230904
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102309042023-06-01 Mapping the evidence on assessment of fitness to work at heights: a scoping review protocol Swart, Lyndsey Claassen, Nicolaas Buys, Tania BMJ Open Occupational and Environmental Medicine INTRODUCTION: Falls from height are a leading cause of serious injury and fatality globally. In South Africa, work at heights is regulated by occupational health and safety legislation, which places responsibility on employers to ensure their workers are fit for high-risk work. There is however no formal procedure or consensus on how fitness to work at heights should be assessed. This paper presents an a priori protocol for a scoping review that seeks to identify and map the current evidence base around the assessment of fitness to work at heights. It forms the initial phase of a PhD study aimed at developing an interdisciplinary consensus statement for assessing fitness to work at heights in the South African construction industry. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) scoping review framework and will be guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. An iterative search will be conducted in a selection of multidisciplinary databases including, Proquest Central, PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, Web of Science, PsychINFO and Google Scholar. Thereafter, searches for grey literature will be performed in Google.com and websites of various national and international agencies, governing bodies and professional organisations with an interest in occupational health and work at heights. Where appropriate, targeted requests for clarification for further information will be undertaken with information sources. A descriptive qualitative content analysis of the results will be conducted and a level of evidence rating will be assigned to each study using the JBI approach. This will allow us to provide some commentary on the rigour of the existing evidence base. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval for the PhD study was granted by the Research Ethics Committee, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, ethics reference number, 486/2021. Results of the scoping review will be submitted to a scientific journal for publication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This protocol is registered on the Open Science Framework at osf.io/yd5gw. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10230904/ /pubmed/37225273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067847 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Swart, Lyndsey
Claassen, Nicolaas
Buys, Tania
Mapping the evidence on assessment of fitness to work at heights: a scoping review protocol
title Mapping the evidence on assessment of fitness to work at heights: a scoping review protocol
title_full Mapping the evidence on assessment of fitness to work at heights: a scoping review protocol
title_fullStr Mapping the evidence on assessment of fitness to work at heights: a scoping review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Mapping the evidence on assessment of fitness to work at heights: a scoping review protocol
title_short Mapping the evidence on assessment of fitness to work at heights: a scoping review protocol
title_sort mapping the evidence on assessment of fitness to work at heights: a scoping review protocol
topic Occupational and Environmental Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10230904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37225273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067847
work_keys_str_mv AT swartlyndsey mappingtheevidenceonassessmentoffitnesstoworkatheightsascopingreviewprotocol
AT claassennicolaas mappingtheevidenceonassessmentoffitnesstoworkatheightsascopingreviewprotocol
AT buystania mappingtheevidenceonassessmentoffitnesstoworkatheightsascopingreviewprotocol