Cargando…

Does knowledge have a half-life? An observational study analyzing the use of older citations in medical and scientific publications

OBJECTIVES: In the process of scientific progress, prior evidence is both relied on and supplanted by new discoveries. We use the term ‘knowledge half-life’ to refer to the phenomenon in which older knowledge is discounted in favour of newer research. By quantifying the knowledge half-life, we sough...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chow, Natalie L.Y., Tateishi, Natalie, Goldhar, Alexa, Zaheer, Rabia, Redelmeier, Donald A., Cheung, Amy H., Schaffer, Ayal, Sinyor, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10231019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37217270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072374
_version_ 1785051665691312128
author Chow, Natalie L.Y.
Tateishi, Natalie
Goldhar, Alexa
Zaheer, Rabia
Redelmeier, Donald A.
Cheung, Amy H.
Schaffer, Ayal
Sinyor, Mark
author_facet Chow, Natalie L.Y.
Tateishi, Natalie
Goldhar, Alexa
Zaheer, Rabia
Redelmeier, Donald A.
Cheung, Amy H.
Schaffer, Ayal
Sinyor, Mark
author_sort Chow, Natalie L.Y.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: In the process of scientific progress, prior evidence is both relied on and supplanted by new discoveries. We use the term ‘knowledge half-life’ to refer to the phenomenon in which older knowledge is discounted in favour of newer research. By quantifying the knowledge half-life, we sought to determine whether research published in more recent years is preferentially cited over older research in medical and scientific articles. DESIGN: An observational study employing a directed, systematic search of current literature. DATA SOURCES: BMJ, PNAS, JAMA, NEJM, The Annals of Internal Medicine, The Lancet, Science and Nature were searched. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Eight high-impact medical and scientific journals were sampled examining original research articles from the first issue of every year over a 25-year span (1996–2020). The outcome of interest was the difference between the publication year of the article and references cited, termed ‘citation lag’. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Analysis of variance was used to identify significant differences in citation lag. RESULTS: A total of 726 articles and 17 895 references were included with a mean citation lag of 7.5±8.4 years. Across all journals, >70% of references had been published within 10 years of the citing article. Approximately 15%–20% of referenced articles were 10–19 years old, and articles more than 20 years old were cited infrequently. Medical journals articles had references with significantly shorter citation lags compared with general science journals (p≤0.01). Articles published before 2009 had references with significantly shorter citation lags compared with those published in 2010–2020 (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study found evidence of a small increase in the citation of older research in medical and scientific literature over the past decade. This phenomenon deserves further characterisation and scrutiny to ensure that ‘old knowledge’ is not being lost.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10231019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102310192023-06-01 Does knowledge have a half-life? An observational study analyzing the use of older citations in medical and scientific publications Chow, Natalie L.Y. Tateishi, Natalie Goldhar, Alexa Zaheer, Rabia Redelmeier, Donald A. Cheung, Amy H. Schaffer, Ayal Sinyor, Mark BMJ Open Medical Publishing and Peer Review OBJECTIVES: In the process of scientific progress, prior evidence is both relied on and supplanted by new discoveries. We use the term ‘knowledge half-life’ to refer to the phenomenon in which older knowledge is discounted in favour of newer research. By quantifying the knowledge half-life, we sought to determine whether research published in more recent years is preferentially cited over older research in medical and scientific articles. DESIGN: An observational study employing a directed, systematic search of current literature. DATA SOURCES: BMJ, PNAS, JAMA, NEJM, The Annals of Internal Medicine, The Lancet, Science and Nature were searched. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Eight high-impact medical and scientific journals were sampled examining original research articles from the first issue of every year over a 25-year span (1996–2020). The outcome of interest was the difference between the publication year of the article and references cited, termed ‘citation lag’. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Analysis of variance was used to identify significant differences in citation lag. RESULTS: A total of 726 articles and 17 895 references were included with a mean citation lag of 7.5±8.4 years. Across all journals, >70% of references had been published within 10 years of the citing article. Approximately 15%–20% of referenced articles were 10–19 years old, and articles more than 20 years old were cited infrequently. Medical journals articles had references with significantly shorter citation lags compared with general science journals (p≤0.01). Articles published before 2009 had references with significantly shorter citation lags compared with those published in 2010–2020 (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study found evidence of a small increase in the citation of older research in medical and scientific literature over the past decade. This phenomenon deserves further characterisation and scrutiny to ensure that ‘old knowledge’ is not being lost. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10231019/ /pubmed/37217270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072374 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Medical Publishing and Peer Review
Chow, Natalie L.Y.
Tateishi, Natalie
Goldhar, Alexa
Zaheer, Rabia
Redelmeier, Donald A.
Cheung, Amy H.
Schaffer, Ayal
Sinyor, Mark
Does knowledge have a half-life? An observational study analyzing the use of older citations in medical and scientific publications
title Does knowledge have a half-life? An observational study analyzing the use of older citations in medical and scientific publications
title_full Does knowledge have a half-life? An observational study analyzing the use of older citations in medical and scientific publications
title_fullStr Does knowledge have a half-life? An observational study analyzing the use of older citations in medical and scientific publications
title_full_unstemmed Does knowledge have a half-life? An observational study analyzing the use of older citations in medical and scientific publications
title_short Does knowledge have a half-life? An observational study analyzing the use of older citations in medical and scientific publications
title_sort does knowledge have a half-life? an observational study analyzing the use of older citations in medical and scientific publications
topic Medical Publishing and Peer Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10231019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37217270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072374
work_keys_str_mv AT chownataliely doesknowledgehaveahalflifeanobservationalstudyanalyzingtheuseofoldercitationsinmedicalandscientificpublications
AT tateishinatalie doesknowledgehaveahalflifeanobservationalstudyanalyzingtheuseofoldercitationsinmedicalandscientificpublications
AT goldharalexa doesknowledgehaveahalflifeanobservationalstudyanalyzingtheuseofoldercitationsinmedicalandscientificpublications
AT zaheerrabia doesknowledgehaveahalflifeanobservationalstudyanalyzingtheuseofoldercitationsinmedicalandscientificpublications
AT redelmeierdonalda doesknowledgehaveahalflifeanobservationalstudyanalyzingtheuseofoldercitationsinmedicalandscientificpublications
AT cheungamyh doesknowledgehaveahalflifeanobservationalstudyanalyzingtheuseofoldercitationsinmedicalandscientificpublications
AT schafferayal doesknowledgehaveahalflifeanobservationalstudyanalyzingtheuseofoldercitationsinmedicalandscientificpublications
AT sinyormark doesknowledgehaveahalflifeanobservationalstudyanalyzingtheuseofoldercitationsinmedicalandscientificpublications