Parasitism Features of a Fig Wasp of Genus Apocrypta (Pteromalidae: Pteromalinae) Associated with a Host Belonging to Ficus Subgenus Ficus

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Non-pollinating fig wasps (NPFWs) in the genus Apocrypta mostly interact with fig species belonging to the subgenus Sycomorus. However, an instance of the Apocrypta species associated with Ficus pedunculosa var. mearnsii in the subgenus Ficus was observed. To better understand its parasitism features, we inferred its life history with the fig growth and estimated the parasitism ability using a quantitative and qualitative approach that compared the ovipositor sheath-length ratio to the fig gall+wall thickness among the species in Apocrypta. Our results showed that this wasp exhibited a high parasitism ability, more advantageous than that of other congeneric species. In contrast, its parasitism rate was low, suggesting that other ecological factors like oviposition strategy and the severe habitat could affect its efficiency. These findings may provide a reference for the symbiosis between fig trees and fig wasps. ABSTRACT: Non-pollinating fig wasps (NPFWs), particularly long-ovipositored Sycoryctina wasps, exhibit a high species specificity and exert complex ecological effects on the obligate mutualism between the plant genus Ficus and pollinating fig wasps. Apocrypta is a genus of NPFWs that mostly interacts with the Ficus species under the subgenus Sycomorus, and the symbiosis case between Apocrypta and F. pedunculosa var. mearnsii, a Ficus species under subgenus Ficus, is unique. As fig’s internal environments and the wasp communities are distinct between the two subgenera, we addressed the following two questions: (1) Are the parasitism features of the Apocrypta wasp associated with F. pedunculosa var. mearnsii different from those of other congeneric species? (2) Is this Apocrypta species an efficient wasp that lives in its unique host? Our observation revealed that this wasp is an endoparasitic idiobiont parasitoid, as most congeneric species are, but developed a relatively long ovipositor. Furthermore, the relationships of the parasitism rate versus the pollinator number, the fig wall, and the sex ratio of the pollinator, respectively, showed that it possessed a higher parasitism ability than that of other congeners. However, its parasitism rate was low, and thus it was not an efficient wasp in its habitat. This difference between parasitism ability and parasitism rate might be a consequence of its oviposition strategy and the severe habitat conditions. These findings may also provide insights into the mechanism to maintain the interaction between the fig tree and the fig wasp community.