Cargando…
Tele-neuropsychological Assessment of Children and Young People: A Systematic Review
The coronavirus pandemic identified a clinical need for pediatric tele-neuropsychology (TeleNP) assessment. However, due to limited research, clinicians have had little information to develop, adapt, or select reliable pediatric assessments for TeleNP. This preliminary systematic review aimed to exa...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10231293/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37359106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40817-023-00144-6 |
_version_ | 1785051711853821952 |
---|---|
author | Walker, Elise J. Kirkham, Fenella J. Stotesbury, Hanne Dimitriou, Dagmara Hood, Anna M. |
author_facet | Walker, Elise J. Kirkham, Fenella J. Stotesbury, Hanne Dimitriou, Dagmara Hood, Anna M. |
author_sort | Walker, Elise J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The coronavirus pandemic identified a clinical need for pediatric tele-neuropsychology (TeleNP) assessment. However, due to limited research, clinicians have had little information to develop, adapt, or select reliable pediatric assessments for TeleNP. This preliminary systematic review aimed to examine the feasibility of pediatric TeleNP assessment alongside (1) patient/family acceptability, (2) reliability, and (3) the quality of the literature. Between May 2021 and November 2022, manual searches of PubMed, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar were conducted using terms related to “pediatric” and “tele-neuropsychology.” After extracting relevant papers with samples aged 0–22 years, predefined exclusion criteria were applied. Quality assessment was completed using the AXIS appraisal tool (91% rater-agreement). Twenty-one studies were included in the review, with reported qualitative and quantitative data on the feasibility, reliability, and acceptability extracted. Across included studies, TeleNP was completed via telephone/video conference with participants either at home, in a local setting accompanied by an assistant, or in a different room but in the same building as the assessor. Pediatric TeleNP was generally reported to be feasible (e.g., minimal behavioral differences) and acceptable (e.g., positive feedback). Nineteen studies conducted some statistical analyses to assess reliability. Most observed no significant difference between in-person and TeleNP for most cognitive domains (i.e., IQ), with a minority finding variable reliability for some tests (e.g., attention, speech, visuo-spatial). Limited reporting of sex-assigned birth, racialized identity, and ethnicity reduced the quality and generalizability of the literature. To aid clinical interpretations, studies should assess underexamined cognitive domains (e.g., processing speed) with larger, more inclusive samples. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40817-023-00144-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10231293 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102312932023-06-01 Tele-neuropsychological Assessment of Children and Young People: A Systematic Review Walker, Elise J. Kirkham, Fenella J. Stotesbury, Hanne Dimitriou, Dagmara Hood, Anna M. J Pediatr Neuropsychol Review The coronavirus pandemic identified a clinical need for pediatric tele-neuropsychology (TeleNP) assessment. However, due to limited research, clinicians have had little information to develop, adapt, or select reliable pediatric assessments for TeleNP. This preliminary systematic review aimed to examine the feasibility of pediatric TeleNP assessment alongside (1) patient/family acceptability, (2) reliability, and (3) the quality of the literature. Between May 2021 and November 2022, manual searches of PubMed, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar were conducted using terms related to “pediatric” and “tele-neuropsychology.” After extracting relevant papers with samples aged 0–22 years, predefined exclusion criteria were applied. Quality assessment was completed using the AXIS appraisal tool (91% rater-agreement). Twenty-one studies were included in the review, with reported qualitative and quantitative data on the feasibility, reliability, and acceptability extracted. Across included studies, TeleNP was completed via telephone/video conference with participants either at home, in a local setting accompanied by an assistant, or in a different room but in the same building as the assessor. Pediatric TeleNP was generally reported to be feasible (e.g., minimal behavioral differences) and acceptable (e.g., positive feedback). Nineteen studies conducted some statistical analyses to assess reliability. Most observed no significant difference between in-person and TeleNP for most cognitive domains (i.e., IQ), with a minority finding variable reliability for some tests (e.g., attention, speech, visuo-spatial). Limited reporting of sex-assigned birth, racialized identity, and ethnicity reduced the quality and generalizability of the literature. To aid clinical interpretations, studies should assess underexamined cognitive domains (e.g., processing speed) with larger, more inclusive samples. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40817-023-00144-6. Springer International Publishing 2023-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10231293/ /pubmed/37359106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40817-023-00144-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Walker, Elise J. Kirkham, Fenella J. Stotesbury, Hanne Dimitriou, Dagmara Hood, Anna M. Tele-neuropsychological Assessment of Children and Young People: A Systematic Review |
title | Tele-neuropsychological Assessment of Children and Young People: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Tele-neuropsychological Assessment of Children and Young People: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Tele-neuropsychological Assessment of Children and Young People: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Tele-neuropsychological Assessment of Children and Young People: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Tele-neuropsychological Assessment of Children and Young People: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | tele-neuropsychological assessment of children and young people: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10231293/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37359106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40817-023-00144-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT walkerelisej teleneuropsychologicalassessmentofchildrenandyoungpeopleasystematicreview AT kirkhamfenellaj teleneuropsychologicalassessmentofchildrenandyoungpeopleasystematicreview AT stotesburyhanne teleneuropsychologicalassessmentofchildrenandyoungpeopleasystematicreview AT dimitrioudagmara teleneuropsychologicalassessmentofchildrenandyoungpeopleasystematicreview AT hoodannam teleneuropsychologicalassessmentofchildrenandyoungpeopleasystematicreview |