Cargando…

Tele-neuropsychological Assessment of Children and Young People: A Systematic Review

The coronavirus pandemic identified a clinical need for pediatric tele-neuropsychology (TeleNP) assessment. However, due to limited research, clinicians have had little information to develop, adapt, or select reliable pediatric assessments for TeleNP. This preliminary systematic review aimed to exa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walker, Elise J., Kirkham, Fenella J., Stotesbury, Hanne, Dimitriou, Dagmara, Hood, Anna M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10231293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37359106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40817-023-00144-6
_version_ 1785051711853821952
author Walker, Elise J.
Kirkham, Fenella J.
Stotesbury, Hanne
Dimitriou, Dagmara
Hood, Anna M.
author_facet Walker, Elise J.
Kirkham, Fenella J.
Stotesbury, Hanne
Dimitriou, Dagmara
Hood, Anna M.
author_sort Walker, Elise J.
collection PubMed
description The coronavirus pandemic identified a clinical need for pediatric tele-neuropsychology (TeleNP) assessment. However, due to limited research, clinicians have had little information to develop, adapt, or select reliable pediatric assessments for TeleNP. This preliminary systematic review aimed to examine the feasibility of pediatric TeleNP assessment alongside (1) patient/family acceptability, (2) reliability, and (3) the quality of the literature. Between May 2021 and November 2022, manual searches of PubMed, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar were conducted using terms related to “pediatric” and “tele-neuropsychology.” After extracting relevant papers with samples aged 0–22 years, predefined exclusion criteria were applied. Quality assessment was completed using the AXIS appraisal tool (91% rater-agreement). Twenty-one studies were included in the review, with reported qualitative and quantitative data on the feasibility, reliability, and acceptability extracted. Across included studies, TeleNP was completed via telephone/video conference with participants either at home, in a local setting accompanied by an assistant, or in a different room but in the same building as the assessor. Pediatric TeleNP was generally reported to be feasible (e.g., minimal behavioral differences) and acceptable (e.g., positive feedback). Nineteen studies conducted some statistical analyses to assess reliability. Most observed no significant difference between in-person and TeleNP for most cognitive domains (i.e., IQ), with a minority finding variable reliability for some tests (e.g., attention, speech, visuo-spatial). Limited reporting of sex-assigned birth, racialized identity, and ethnicity reduced the quality and generalizability of the literature. To aid clinical interpretations, studies should assess underexamined cognitive domains (e.g., processing speed) with larger, more inclusive samples. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40817-023-00144-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10231293
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102312932023-06-01 Tele-neuropsychological Assessment of Children and Young People: A Systematic Review Walker, Elise J. Kirkham, Fenella J. Stotesbury, Hanne Dimitriou, Dagmara Hood, Anna M. J Pediatr Neuropsychol Review The coronavirus pandemic identified a clinical need for pediatric tele-neuropsychology (TeleNP) assessment. However, due to limited research, clinicians have had little information to develop, adapt, or select reliable pediatric assessments for TeleNP. This preliminary systematic review aimed to examine the feasibility of pediatric TeleNP assessment alongside (1) patient/family acceptability, (2) reliability, and (3) the quality of the literature. Between May 2021 and November 2022, manual searches of PubMed, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar were conducted using terms related to “pediatric” and “tele-neuropsychology.” After extracting relevant papers with samples aged 0–22 years, predefined exclusion criteria were applied. Quality assessment was completed using the AXIS appraisal tool (91% rater-agreement). Twenty-one studies were included in the review, with reported qualitative and quantitative data on the feasibility, reliability, and acceptability extracted. Across included studies, TeleNP was completed via telephone/video conference with participants either at home, in a local setting accompanied by an assistant, or in a different room but in the same building as the assessor. Pediatric TeleNP was generally reported to be feasible (e.g., minimal behavioral differences) and acceptable (e.g., positive feedback). Nineteen studies conducted some statistical analyses to assess reliability. Most observed no significant difference between in-person and TeleNP for most cognitive domains (i.e., IQ), with a minority finding variable reliability for some tests (e.g., attention, speech, visuo-spatial). Limited reporting of sex-assigned birth, racialized identity, and ethnicity reduced the quality and generalizability of the literature. To aid clinical interpretations, studies should assess underexamined cognitive domains (e.g., processing speed) with larger, more inclusive samples. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40817-023-00144-6. Springer International Publishing 2023-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10231293/ /pubmed/37359106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40817-023-00144-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Walker, Elise J.
Kirkham, Fenella J.
Stotesbury, Hanne
Dimitriou, Dagmara
Hood, Anna M.
Tele-neuropsychological Assessment of Children and Young People: A Systematic Review
title Tele-neuropsychological Assessment of Children and Young People: A Systematic Review
title_full Tele-neuropsychological Assessment of Children and Young People: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Tele-neuropsychological Assessment of Children and Young People: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Tele-neuropsychological Assessment of Children and Young People: A Systematic Review
title_short Tele-neuropsychological Assessment of Children and Young People: A Systematic Review
title_sort tele-neuropsychological assessment of children and young people: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10231293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37359106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40817-023-00144-6
work_keys_str_mv AT walkerelisej teleneuropsychologicalassessmentofchildrenandyoungpeopleasystematicreview
AT kirkhamfenellaj teleneuropsychologicalassessmentofchildrenandyoungpeopleasystematicreview
AT stotesburyhanne teleneuropsychologicalassessmentofchildrenandyoungpeopleasystematicreview
AT dimitrioudagmara teleneuropsychologicalassessmentofchildrenandyoungpeopleasystematicreview
AT hoodannam teleneuropsychologicalassessmentofchildrenandyoungpeopleasystematicreview