Cargando…

Face masks influence emotion judgments of facial expressions: a drift–diffusion model

Face masks slow the spread of SARS-CoV-2, but it has been unknown how masks might reshape social interaction. One important possibility is that masks may influence how individuals communicate emotion through facial expressions. Here, we clarify to what extent—and how—masks influence facial emotion c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Williams, W. Craig, Haque, Eisha, Mai, Becky, Venkatraman, Vinod
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10231301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37258558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35381-4
_version_ 1785051713987674112
author Williams, W. Craig
Haque, Eisha
Mai, Becky
Venkatraman, Vinod
author_facet Williams, W. Craig
Haque, Eisha
Mai, Becky
Venkatraman, Vinod
author_sort Williams, W. Craig
collection PubMed
description Face masks slow the spread of SARS-CoV-2, but it has been unknown how masks might reshape social interaction. One important possibility is that masks may influence how individuals communicate emotion through facial expressions. Here, we clarify to what extent—and how—masks influence facial emotion communication, through drift–diffusion modeling (DDM). Over two independent pre-registered studies, conducted three and 6 months into the COVID-19 pandemic, online participants judged expressions of 6 emotions (anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, surprise) with the lower or upper face “masked” or unmasked. Participants in Study 1 (N = 228) correctly identified expressions above chance with lower face masks. However, they were less likely—and slower—to correctly identify these expressions relative to without masks, and they accumulated evidence for emotion more slowly—via decreased drift rate in DDM. This pattern replicated and intensified 3 months later in Study 2 (N = 264). These findings highlight how effectively individuals still communicate with masks, but also explain why they can experience difficulties communicating when masked. By revealing evidence accumulation as the underlying mechanism, this work suggests that time-sensitive situations may risk miscommunication with masks. This research could inform critical interventions to promote continued mask wearing as needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10231301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102313012023-06-01 Face masks influence emotion judgments of facial expressions: a drift–diffusion model Williams, W. Craig Haque, Eisha Mai, Becky Venkatraman, Vinod Sci Rep Article Face masks slow the spread of SARS-CoV-2, but it has been unknown how masks might reshape social interaction. One important possibility is that masks may influence how individuals communicate emotion through facial expressions. Here, we clarify to what extent—and how—masks influence facial emotion communication, through drift–diffusion modeling (DDM). Over two independent pre-registered studies, conducted three and 6 months into the COVID-19 pandemic, online participants judged expressions of 6 emotions (anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, surprise) with the lower or upper face “masked” or unmasked. Participants in Study 1 (N = 228) correctly identified expressions above chance with lower face masks. However, they were less likely—and slower—to correctly identify these expressions relative to without masks, and they accumulated evidence for emotion more slowly—via decreased drift rate in DDM. This pattern replicated and intensified 3 months later in Study 2 (N = 264). These findings highlight how effectively individuals still communicate with masks, but also explain why they can experience difficulties communicating when masked. By revealing evidence accumulation as the underlying mechanism, this work suggests that time-sensitive situations may risk miscommunication with masks. This research could inform critical interventions to promote continued mask wearing as needed. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10231301/ /pubmed/37258558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35381-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Williams, W. Craig
Haque, Eisha
Mai, Becky
Venkatraman, Vinod
Face masks influence emotion judgments of facial expressions: a drift–diffusion model
title Face masks influence emotion judgments of facial expressions: a drift–diffusion model
title_full Face masks influence emotion judgments of facial expressions: a drift–diffusion model
title_fullStr Face masks influence emotion judgments of facial expressions: a drift–diffusion model
title_full_unstemmed Face masks influence emotion judgments of facial expressions: a drift–diffusion model
title_short Face masks influence emotion judgments of facial expressions: a drift–diffusion model
title_sort face masks influence emotion judgments of facial expressions: a drift–diffusion model
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10231301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37258558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35381-4
work_keys_str_mv AT williamswcraig facemasksinfluenceemotionjudgmentsoffacialexpressionsadriftdiffusionmodel
AT haqueeisha facemasksinfluenceemotionjudgmentsoffacialexpressionsadriftdiffusionmodel
AT maibecky facemasksinfluenceemotionjudgmentsoffacialexpressionsadriftdiffusionmodel
AT venkatramanvinod facemasksinfluenceemotionjudgmentsoffacialexpressionsadriftdiffusionmodel