Cargando…

Myopia progression risk assessment score (MPRAS): a promising new tool for risk stratification

Timely identification of individuals “at-risk” for myopia progression is the leading requisite for myopia practice as it aids in the decision of appropriate management. This study aimed to develop ‘myopia progression risk assessment score’ (MPRAS) based on multiple risk factors (10) to determine whe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manoharan, Manoj K., Thakur, Swapnil, Dhakal, Rohit, Gupta, Satish K., Priscilla, Jacinth J., Bhandary, Shashank K., Srivastava, Alok, Marmamula, Srinivas, Poigal, Nitish, Verkicharla, Pavan K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10231302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37258536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35696-2
_version_ 1785051714292809728
author Manoharan, Manoj K.
Thakur, Swapnil
Dhakal, Rohit
Gupta, Satish K.
Priscilla, Jacinth J.
Bhandary, Shashank K.
Srivastava, Alok
Marmamula, Srinivas
Poigal, Nitish
Verkicharla, Pavan K.
author_facet Manoharan, Manoj K.
Thakur, Swapnil
Dhakal, Rohit
Gupta, Satish K.
Priscilla, Jacinth J.
Bhandary, Shashank K.
Srivastava, Alok
Marmamula, Srinivas
Poigal, Nitish
Verkicharla, Pavan K.
author_sort Manoharan, Manoj K.
collection PubMed
description Timely identification of individuals “at-risk” for myopia progression is the leading requisite for myopia practice as it aids in the decision of appropriate management. This study aimed to develop ‘myopia progression risk assessment score’ (MPRAS) based on multiple risk factors (10) to determine whether a myope is “at-risk” or “low-risk” for myopia progression. Two risk-score models (model-1: non-weightage, model-2: weightage) were developed. Ability of MPRAS to diagnose individual “at-risk” for myopia progression was compared against decision of five clinicians in 149 myopes, aged 6–29 years. Using model-1 (no-weightage), further 7 sub-models were created with varying number of risk factors in decreasing step-wise manner (1a: 10 factors to 1g: 4 factors). In random eye analysis for model-1, the highest Youden’s J-index (0.63–0.65) led to the MPRAS cut-off score of 41.50–43.50 for 5 clinicians with a sensitivity ranging from 78 to 85% and specificity ranging from 79 to 87%. For this cut-off score, the mean area under the curve (AUC) between clinicians and the MPRAS model ranged from 0.89 to 0.90. Model-2 (weighted for few risk-factors) provided similar sensitivity, specificity, and AUC. Sub-model analysis revealed greater AUC with high sensitivity (89%) and specificity (94%) in model-1g that has 4 risk factors compared to other sub-models (1a–1f). All the MPRAS models showed good agreement with the clinician’s decision in identifying individuals “at-risk” for myopia progression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10231302
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102313022023-06-01 Myopia progression risk assessment score (MPRAS): a promising new tool for risk stratification Manoharan, Manoj K. Thakur, Swapnil Dhakal, Rohit Gupta, Satish K. Priscilla, Jacinth J. Bhandary, Shashank K. Srivastava, Alok Marmamula, Srinivas Poigal, Nitish Verkicharla, Pavan K. Sci Rep Article Timely identification of individuals “at-risk” for myopia progression is the leading requisite for myopia practice as it aids in the decision of appropriate management. This study aimed to develop ‘myopia progression risk assessment score’ (MPRAS) based on multiple risk factors (10) to determine whether a myope is “at-risk” or “low-risk” for myopia progression. Two risk-score models (model-1: non-weightage, model-2: weightage) were developed. Ability of MPRAS to diagnose individual “at-risk” for myopia progression was compared against decision of five clinicians in 149 myopes, aged 6–29 years. Using model-1 (no-weightage), further 7 sub-models were created with varying number of risk factors in decreasing step-wise manner (1a: 10 factors to 1g: 4 factors). In random eye analysis for model-1, the highest Youden’s J-index (0.63–0.65) led to the MPRAS cut-off score of 41.50–43.50 for 5 clinicians with a sensitivity ranging from 78 to 85% and specificity ranging from 79 to 87%. For this cut-off score, the mean area under the curve (AUC) between clinicians and the MPRAS model ranged from 0.89 to 0.90. Model-2 (weighted for few risk-factors) provided similar sensitivity, specificity, and AUC. Sub-model analysis revealed greater AUC with high sensitivity (89%) and specificity (94%) in model-1g that has 4 risk factors compared to other sub-models (1a–1f). All the MPRAS models showed good agreement with the clinician’s decision in identifying individuals “at-risk” for myopia progression. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10231302/ /pubmed/37258536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35696-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Manoharan, Manoj K.
Thakur, Swapnil
Dhakal, Rohit
Gupta, Satish K.
Priscilla, Jacinth J.
Bhandary, Shashank K.
Srivastava, Alok
Marmamula, Srinivas
Poigal, Nitish
Verkicharla, Pavan K.
Myopia progression risk assessment score (MPRAS): a promising new tool for risk stratification
title Myopia progression risk assessment score (MPRAS): a promising new tool for risk stratification
title_full Myopia progression risk assessment score (MPRAS): a promising new tool for risk stratification
title_fullStr Myopia progression risk assessment score (MPRAS): a promising new tool for risk stratification
title_full_unstemmed Myopia progression risk assessment score (MPRAS): a promising new tool for risk stratification
title_short Myopia progression risk assessment score (MPRAS): a promising new tool for risk stratification
title_sort myopia progression risk assessment score (mpras): a promising new tool for risk stratification
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10231302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37258536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35696-2
work_keys_str_mv AT manoharanmanojk myopiaprogressionriskassessmentscoremprasapromisingnewtoolforriskstratification
AT thakurswapnil myopiaprogressionriskassessmentscoremprasapromisingnewtoolforriskstratification
AT dhakalrohit myopiaprogressionriskassessmentscoremprasapromisingnewtoolforriskstratification
AT guptasatishk myopiaprogressionriskassessmentscoremprasapromisingnewtoolforriskstratification
AT priscillajacinthj myopiaprogressionriskassessmentscoremprasapromisingnewtoolforriskstratification
AT bhandaryshashankk myopiaprogressionriskassessmentscoremprasapromisingnewtoolforriskstratification
AT srivastavaalok myopiaprogressionriskassessmentscoremprasapromisingnewtoolforriskstratification
AT marmamulasrinivas myopiaprogressionriskassessmentscoremprasapromisingnewtoolforriskstratification
AT poigalnitish myopiaprogressionriskassessmentscoremprasapromisingnewtoolforriskstratification
AT verkicharlapavank myopiaprogressionriskassessmentscoremprasapromisingnewtoolforriskstratification