Cargando…

A Diagnostic Accuracy Study to Evaluate Standard Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) Alone to Safely Rule Out Imported Malaria in Children Presenting to UK Emergency Departments

BACKGROUND: Microscopy is the gold standard for malaria diagnosis but is dependent on trained personnel. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) form the mainstay of diagnosis in endemic areas without access to high-quality microscopy. We aimed to evaluate whether RDT alone could rule out imported malaria in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bird, Chris, Hayward, Gail N, Turner, Philip J, Merrick, Vanessa, Lyttle, Mark D, Mullen, Niall, Fanshawe, Thomas R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10231394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37070464
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jpids/piad024
_version_ 1785051733493284864
author Bird, Chris
Hayward, Gail N
Turner, Philip J
Merrick, Vanessa
Lyttle, Mark D
Mullen, Niall
Fanshawe, Thomas R
author_facet Bird, Chris
Hayward, Gail N
Turner, Philip J
Merrick, Vanessa
Lyttle, Mark D
Mullen, Niall
Fanshawe, Thomas R
author_sort Bird, Chris
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Microscopy is the gold standard for malaria diagnosis but is dependent on trained personnel. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) form the mainstay of diagnosis in endemic areas without access to high-quality microscopy. We aimed to evaluate whether RDT alone could rule out imported malaria in children presenting to UK emergency departments (EDs). METHODS: UK-based, multi-center, retrospective, diagnostic accuracy study. Included: any child <16 years presenting to ED with history of fever and travel to a malaria-endemic country, between 01/01/2016 and 31/12/2017. Diagnosis: microscopy for malarial parasites (clinical reference standard) and RDT (index test). UK Health Research Authority approval: 20/HRA/1341. RESULTS: There were 47 cases of malaria out of 1,414 eligible cases (prevalence 3.3%) in a cohort of children whose median age was 4 years (IQR 2–9), of whom 43% were female. Cases of Plasmodium falciparum totaled 36 (77%, prevalence 2.5%). The sensitivity of RDT alone to detect malaria infection due to any Plasmodium species was 93.6% (95% CI 82.5–98.7%), specificity 99.4% (95% CI 98.9–99.7%), positive predictive value 84.6% (95% CI 71.9–93.1%) and negative predictive value 99.8% (95% CI 99.4–100.0%). Sensitivity of RDT to detect P. falciparum infection was 100% (90.3–100%), specificity 98.8% (98.1–99.3%), positive predictive value 69.2% (54.9–81.2%, n = 46/52) and negative predictive value 100% (99.7–100%, n = 1,362/1,362). CONCLUSIONS: RDTs were 100% sensitive in detecting P. falciparum malaria. However, lower sensitivity for other malaria species and the rise of pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 (pfhrp2/3) gene deletions in the P. falciparum parasite mandate the continued use of microscopy for diagnosing malaria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10231394
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102313942023-06-01 A Diagnostic Accuracy Study to Evaluate Standard Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) Alone to Safely Rule Out Imported Malaria in Children Presenting to UK Emergency Departments Bird, Chris Hayward, Gail N Turner, Philip J Merrick, Vanessa Lyttle, Mark D Mullen, Niall Fanshawe, Thomas R J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc Original Articles BACKGROUND: Microscopy is the gold standard for malaria diagnosis but is dependent on trained personnel. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) form the mainstay of diagnosis in endemic areas without access to high-quality microscopy. We aimed to evaluate whether RDT alone could rule out imported malaria in children presenting to UK emergency departments (EDs). METHODS: UK-based, multi-center, retrospective, diagnostic accuracy study. Included: any child <16 years presenting to ED with history of fever and travel to a malaria-endemic country, between 01/01/2016 and 31/12/2017. Diagnosis: microscopy for malarial parasites (clinical reference standard) and RDT (index test). UK Health Research Authority approval: 20/HRA/1341. RESULTS: There were 47 cases of malaria out of 1,414 eligible cases (prevalence 3.3%) in a cohort of children whose median age was 4 years (IQR 2–9), of whom 43% were female. Cases of Plasmodium falciparum totaled 36 (77%, prevalence 2.5%). The sensitivity of RDT alone to detect malaria infection due to any Plasmodium species was 93.6% (95% CI 82.5–98.7%), specificity 99.4% (95% CI 98.9–99.7%), positive predictive value 84.6% (95% CI 71.9–93.1%) and negative predictive value 99.8% (95% CI 99.4–100.0%). Sensitivity of RDT to detect P. falciparum infection was 100% (90.3–100%), specificity 98.8% (98.1–99.3%), positive predictive value 69.2% (54.9–81.2%, n = 46/52) and negative predictive value 100% (99.7–100%, n = 1,362/1,362). CONCLUSIONS: RDTs were 100% sensitive in detecting P. falciparum malaria. However, lower sensitivity for other malaria species and the rise of pfhrp2 and pfhrp3 (pfhrp2/3) gene deletions in the P. falciparum parasite mandate the continued use of microscopy for diagnosing malaria. Oxford University Press 2023-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10231394/ /pubmed/37070464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jpids/piad024 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Articles
Bird, Chris
Hayward, Gail N
Turner, Philip J
Merrick, Vanessa
Lyttle, Mark D
Mullen, Niall
Fanshawe, Thomas R
A Diagnostic Accuracy Study to Evaluate Standard Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) Alone to Safely Rule Out Imported Malaria in Children Presenting to UK Emergency Departments
title A Diagnostic Accuracy Study to Evaluate Standard Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) Alone to Safely Rule Out Imported Malaria in Children Presenting to UK Emergency Departments
title_full A Diagnostic Accuracy Study to Evaluate Standard Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) Alone to Safely Rule Out Imported Malaria in Children Presenting to UK Emergency Departments
title_fullStr A Diagnostic Accuracy Study to Evaluate Standard Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) Alone to Safely Rule Out Imported Malaria in Children Presenting to UK Emergency Departments
title_full_unstemmed A Diagnostic Accuracy Study to Evaluate Standard Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) Alone to Safely Rule Out Imported Malaria in Children Presenting to UK Emergency Departments
title_short A Diagnostic Accuracy Study to Evaluate Standard Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) Alone to Safely Rule Out Imported Malaria in Children Presenting to UK Emergency Departments
title_sort diagnostic accuracy study to evaluate standard rapid diagnostic test (rdt) alone to safely rule out imported malaria in children presenting to uk emergency departments
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10231394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37070464
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jpids/piad024
work_keys_str_mv AT birdchris adiagnosticaccuracystudytoevaluatestandardrapiddiagnostictestrdtalonetosafelyruleoutimportedmalariainchildrenpresentingtoukemergencydepartments
AT haywardgailn adiagnosticaccuracystudytoevaluatestandardrapiddiagnostictestrdtalonetosafelyruleoutimportedmalariainchildrenpresentingtoukemergencydepartments
AT turnerphilipj adiagnosticaccuracystudytoevaluatestandardrapiddiagnostictestrdtalonetosafelyruleoutimportedmalariainchildrenpresentingtoukemergencydepartments
AT merrickvanessa adiagnosticaccuracystudytoevaluatestandardrapiddiagnostictestrdtalonetosafelyruleoutimportedmalariainchildrenpresentingtoukemergencydepartments
AT lyttlemarkd adiagnosticaccuracystudytoevaluatestandardrapiddiagnostictestrdtalonetosafelyruleoutimportedmalariainchildrenpresentingtoukemergencydepartments
AT mullenniall adiagnosticaccuracystudytoevaluatestandardrapiddiagnostictestrdtalonetosafelyruleoutimportedmalariainchildrenpresentingtoukemergencydepartments
AT fanshawethomasr adiagnosticaccuracystudytoevaluatestandardrapiddiagnostictestrdtalonetosafelyruleoutimportedmalariainchildrenpresentingtoukemergencydepartments
AT adiagnosticaccuracystudytoevaluatestandardrapiddiagnostictestrdtalonetosafelyruleoutimportedmalariainchildrenpresentingtoukemergencydepartments
AT birdchris diagnosticaccuracystudytoevaluatestandardrapiddiagnostictestrdtalonetosafelyruleoutimportedmalariainchildrenpresentingtoukemergencydepartments
AT haywardgailn diagnosticaccuracystudytoevaluatestandardrapiddiagnostictestrdtalonetosafelyruleoutimportedmalariainchildrenpresentingtoukemergencydepartments
AT turnerphilipj diagnosticaccuracystudytoevaluatestandardrapiddiagnostictestrdtalonetosafelyruleoutimportedmalariainchildrenpresentingtoukemergencydepartments
AT merrickvanessa diagnosticaccuracystudytoevaluatestandardrapiddiagnostictestrdtalonetosafelyruleoutimportedmalariainchildrenpresentingtoukemergencydepartments
AT lyttlemarkd diagnosticaccuracystudytoevaluatestandardrapiddiagnostictestrdtalonetosafelyruleoutimportedmalariainchildrenpresentingtoukemergencydepartments
AT mullenniall diagnosticaccuracystudytoevaluatestandardrapiddiagnostictestrdtalonetosafelyruleoutimportedmalariainchildrenpresentingtoukemergencydepartments
AT fanshawethomasr diagnosticaccuracystudytoevaluatestandardrapiddiagnostictestrdtalonetosafelyruleoutimportedmalariainchildrenpresentingtoukemergencydepartments
AT diagnosticaccuracystudytoevaluatestandardrapiddiagnostictestrdtalonetosafelyruleoutimportedmalariainchildrenpresentingtoukemergencydepartments