Cargando…
Mechanical bowel preparation and antibiotics in elective colorectal surgery: network meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: The use of intravenous antibiotics at anaesthetic induction in colorectal surgery is the standard of care. However, the role of mechanical bowel preparation, enemas, and oral antibiotics in surgical site infection, anastomotic leak, and other perioperative outcomes remains controversial....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10231808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37257059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrad040 |
_version_ | 1785051816803696640 |
---|---|
author | Tan, Jonavan Ryan, Éanna J Davey, Matthew G McHugh, Fiachra T Creavin, Ben Whelan, Maria C Kelly, Michael E Neary, Paul C Kavanagh, Dara O O’Riordan, James M |
author_facet | Tan, Jonavan Ryan, Éanna J Davey, Matthew G McHugh, Fiachra T Creavin, Ben Whelan, Maria C Kelly, Michael E Neary, Paul C Kavanagh, Dara O O’Riordan, James M |
author_sort | Tan, Jonavan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The use of intravenous antibiotics at anaesthetic induction in colorectal surgery is the standard of care. However, the role of mechanical bowel preparation, enemas, and oral antibiotics in surgical site infection, anastomotic leak, and other perioperative outcomes remains controversial. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal preoperative bowel preparation strategy in elective colorectal surgery. METHODS: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs was performed with searches from PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to December 2022. Primary outcomes included surgical site infection and anastomotic leak. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality rate, ileus, length of stay, return to theatre, other infections, and side effects of antibiotic therapy or bowel preparation. RESULTS: Sixty RCTs involving 16 314 patients were included in the final analysis: 3465 (21.2 per cent) had intravenous antibiotics alone, 5268 (32.3 per cent) had intravenous antibiotics + mechanical bowel preparation, 1710 (10.5 per cent) had intravenous antibiotics + oral antibiotics, 4183 (25.6 per cent) had intravenous antibiotics + oral antibiotics + mechanical bowel preparation, 262 (1.6 per cent) had intravenous antibiotics + enemas, and 1426 (8.7 per cent) had oral antibiotics + mechanical bowel preparation. With intravenous antibiotics as a baseline comparator, network meta-analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in total surgical site infection risk with intravenous antibiotics + oral antibiotics (OR 0.47 (95 per cent c.i. 0.32 to 0.68)) and intravenous antibiotics + oral antibiotics + mechanical bowel preparation (OR 0.55 (95 per cent c.i. 0.40 to 0.76)), whereas oral antibiotics + mechanical bowel preparation resulted in a higher surgical site infection rate compared with intravenous antibiotics alone (OR 1.84 (95 per cent c.i. 1.20 to 2.81)). Anastomotic leak rates were lower with intravenous antibiotics + oral antibiotics (OR 0.63 (95 per cent c.i. 0.44 to 0.90)) and intravenous antibiotics + oral antibiotics + mechanical bowel preparation (OR 0.62 (95 per cent c.i. 0.41 to 0.94)) compared with intravenous antibiotics alone. There was no significant difference in outcomes with mechanical bowel preparation in the absence of intravenous antibiotics and oral antibiotics in the main analysis. CONCLUSION: A bowel preparation strategy with intravenous antibiotics + oral antibiotics, with or without mechanical bowel preparation, should represent the standard of care for patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10231808 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102318082023-06-01 Mechanical bowel preparation and antibiotics in elective colorectal surgery: network meta-analysis Tan, Jonavan Ryan, Éanna J Davey, Matthew G McHugh, Fiachra T Creavin, Ben Whelan, Maria C Kelly, Michael E Neary, Paul C Kavanagh, Dara O O’Riordan, James M BJS Open Systematic Review BACKGROUND: The use of intravenous antibiotics at anaesthetic induction in colorectal surgery is the standard of care. However, the role of mechanical bowel preparation, enemas, and oral antibiotics in surgical site infection, anastomotic leak, and other perioperative outcomes remains controversial. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal preoperative bowel preparation strategy in elective colorectal surgery. METHODS: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs was performed with searches from PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to December 2022. Primary outcomes included surgical site infection and anastomotic leak. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality rate, ileus, length of stay, return to theatre, other infections, and side effects of antibiotic therapy or bowel preparation. RESULTS: Sixty RCTs involving 16 314 patients were included in the final analysis: 3465 (21.2 per cent) had intravenous antibiotics alone, 5268 (32.3 per cent) had intravenous antibiotics + mechanical bowel preparation, 1710 (10.5 per cent) had intravenous antibiotics + oral antibiotics, 4183 (25.6 per cent) had intravenous antibiotics + oral antibiotics + mechanical bowel preparation, 262 (1.6 per cent) had intravenous antibiotics + enemas, and 1426 (8.7 per cent) had oral antibiotics + mechanical bowel preparation. With intravenous antibiotics as a baseline comparator, network meta-analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in total surgical site infection risk with intravenous antibiotics + oral antibiotics (OR 0.47 (95 per cent c.i. 0.32 to 0.68)) and intravenous antibiotics + oral antibiotics + mechanical bowel preparation (OR 0.55 (95 per cent c.i. 0.40 to 0.76)), whereas oral antibiotics + mechanical bowel preparation resulted in a higher surgical site infection rate compared with intravenous antibiotics alone (OR 1.84 (95 per cent c.i. 1.20 to 2.81)). Anastomotic leak rates were lower with intravenous antibiotics + oral antibiotics (OR 0.63 (95 per cent c.i. 0.44 to 0.90)) and intravenous antibiotics + oral antibiotics + mechanical bowel preparation (OR 0.62 (95 per cent c.i. 0.41 to 0.94)) compared with intravenous antibiotics alone. There was no significant difference in outcomes with mechanical bowel preparation in the absence of intravenous antibiotics and oral antibiotics in the main analysis. CONCLUSION: A bowel preparation strategy with intravenous antibiotics + oral antibiotics, with or without mechanical bowel preparation, should represent the standard of care for patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. Oxford University Press 2023-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10231808/ /pubmed/37257059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrad040 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Tan, Jonavan Ryan, Éanna J Davey, Matthew G McHugh, Fiachra T Creavin, Ben Whelan, Maria C Kelly, Michael E Neary, Paul C Kavanagh, Dara O O’Riordan, James M Mechanical bowel preparation and antibiotics in elective colorectal surgery: network meta-analysis |
title | Mechanical bowel preparation and antibiotics in elective colorectal surgery: network meta-analysis |
title_full | Mechanical bowel preparation and antibiotics in elective colorectal surgery: network meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Mechanical bowel preparation and antibiotics in elective colorectal surgery: network meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Mechanical bowel preparation and antibiotics in elective colorectal surgery: network meta-analysis |
title_short | Mechanical bowel preparation and antibiotics in elective colorectal surgery: network meta-analysis |
title_sort | mechanical bowel preparation and antibiotics in elective colorectal surgery: network meta-analysis |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10231808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37257059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrad040 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tanjonavan mechanicalbowelpreparationandantibioticsinelectivecolorectalsurgerynetworkmetaanalysis AT ryaneannaj mechanicalbowelpreparationandantibioticsinelectivecolorectalsurgerynetworkmetaanalysis AT daveymatthewg mechanicalbowelpreparationandantibioticsinelectivecolorectalsurgerynetworkmetaanalysis AT mchughfiachrat mechanicalbowelpreparationandantibioticsinelectivecolorectalsurgerynetworkmetaanalysis AT creavinben mechanicalbowelpreparationandantibioticsinelectivecolorectalsurgerynetworkmetaanalysis AT whelanmariac mechanicalbowelpreparationandantibioticsinelectivecolorectalsurgerynetworkmetaanalysis AT kellymichaele mechanicalbowelpreparationandantibioticsinelectivecolorectalsurgerynetworkmetaanalysis AT nearypaulc mechanicalbowelpreparationandantibioticsinelectivecolorectalsurgerynetworkmetaanalysis AT kavanaghdarao mechanicalbowelpreparationandantibioticsinelectivecolorectalsurgerynetworkmetaanalysis AT oriordanjamesm mechanicalbowelpreparationandantibioticsinelectivecolorectalsurgerynetworkmetaanalysis |