Cargando…

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting and Confounder Missingness in Electronic Health Record-based Analyses: A Comparison of Approaches Using Plasmode Simulation

Electronic health record (EHR) data represent a critical resource for comparative effectiveness research, allowing investigators to study intervention effects in real-world settings with large patient samples. However, high levels of missingness in confounder variables is common, challenging the per...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vader, Daniel T., Mamtani, Ronac, Li, Yun, Griffith, Sandra D., Calip, Gregory S., Hubbard, Rebecca A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10231933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37155612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001618
_version_ 1785051845161385984
author Vader, Daniel T.
Mamtani, Ronac
Li, Yun
Griffith, Sandra D.
Calip, Gregory S.
Hubbard, Rebecca A.
author_facet Vader, Daniel T.
Mamtani, Ronac
Li, Yun
Griffith, Sandra D.
Calip, Gregory S.
Hubbard, Rebecca A.
author_sort Vader, Daniel T.
collection PubMed
description Electronic health record (EHR) data represent a critical resource for comparative effectiveness research, allowing investigators to study intervention effects in real-world settings with large patient samples. However, high levels of missingness in confounder variables is common, challenging the perceived validity of EHR-based investigations. METHODS: We investigated performance of multiple imputation and propensity score (PS) calibration when conducting inverse probability of treatment weights (IPTW)-based comparative effectiveness research using EHR data with missingness in confounder variables and outcome misclassification. Our motivating example compared effectiveness of immunotherapy versus chemotherapy treatment of advanced bladder cancer with missingness in a key prognostic variable. We captured complexity in EHR data structures using a plasmode simulation approach to spike investigator-defined effects into resamples of a cohort of 4361 patients from a nationwide deidentified EHR-derived database. We characterized statistical properties of IPTW hazard ratio estimates when using multiple imputation or PS calibration missingness approaches. RESULTS: Multiple imputation and PS calibration performed similarly, maintaining ≤0.05 absolute bias in the marginal hazard ratio even when ≥50% of subjects had missing at random or missing not at random confounder data. Multiple imputation required greater computational resources, taking nearly 40 times as long as PS calibration to complete. Outcome misclassification minimally increased bias of both methods. CONCLUSION: Our results support multiple imputation and PS calibration approaches to missingness in missing completely at random or missing at random confounder variables in EHR-based IPTW comparative effectiveness analyses, even with missingness ≥50%. PS calibration represents a computationally efficient alternative to multiple imputation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10231933
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102319332023-06-01 Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting and Confounder Missingness in Electronic Health Record-based Analyses: A Comparison of Approaches Using Plasmode Simulation Vader, Daniel T. Mamtani, Ronac Li, Yun Griffith, Sandra D. Calip, Gregory S. Hubbard, Rebecca A. Epidemiology Methods Electronic health record (EHR) data represent a critical resource for comparative effectiveness research, allowing investigators to study intervention effects in real-world settings with large patient samples. However, high levels of missingness in confounder variables is common, challenging the perceived validity of EHR-based investigations. METHODS: We investigated performance of multiple imputation and propensity score (PS) calibration when conducting inverse probability of treatment weights (IPTW)-based comparative effectiveness research using EHR data with missingness in confounder variables and outcome misclassification. Our motivating example compared effectiveness of immunotherapy versus chemotherapy treatment of advanced bladder cancer with missingness in a key prognostic variable. We captured complexity in EHR data structures using a plasmode simulation approach to spike investigator-defined effects into resamples of a cohort of 4361 patients from a nationwide deidentified EHR-derived database. We characterized statistical properties of IPTW hazard ratio estimates when using multiple imputation or PS calibration missingness approaches. RESULTS: Multiple imputation and PS calibration performed similarly, maintaining ≤0.05 absolute bias in the marginal hazard ratio even when ≥50% of subjects had missing at random or missing not at random confounder data. Multiple imputation required greater computational resources, taking nearly 40 times as long as PS calibration to complete. Outcome misclassification minimally increased bias of both methods. CONCLUSION: Our results support multiple imputation and PS calibration approaches to missingness in missing completely at random or missing at random confounder variables in EHR-based IPTW comparative effectiveness analyses, even with missingness ≥50%. PS calibration represents a computationally efficient alternative to multiple imputation. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-04-26 2023-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10231933/ /pubmed/37155612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001618 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Methods
Vader, Daniel T.
Mamtani, Ronac
Li, Yun
Griffith, Sandra D.
Calip, Gregory S.
Hubbard, Rebecca A.
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting and Confounder Missingness in Electronic Health Record-based Analyses: A Comparison of Approaches Using Plasmode Simulation
title Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting and Confounder Missingness in Electronic Health Record-based Analyses: A Comparison of Approaches Using Plasmode Simulation
title_full Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting and Confounder Missingness in Electronic Health Record-based Analyses: A Comparison of Approaches Using Plasmode Simulation
title_fullStr Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting and Confounder Missingness in Electronic Health Record-based Analyses: A Comparison of Approaches Using Plasmode Simulation
title_full_unstemmed Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting and Confounder Missingness in Electronic Health Record-based Analyses: A Comparison of Approaches Using Plasmode Simulation
title_short Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting and Confounder Missingness in Electronic Health Record-based Analyses: A Comparison of Approaches Using Plasmode Simulation
title_sort inverse probability of treatment weighting and confounder missingness in electronic health record-based analyses: a comparison of approaches using plasmode simulation
topic Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10231933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37155612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001618
work_keys_str_mv AT vaderdanielt inverseprobabilityoftreatmentweightingandconfoundermissingnessinelectronichealthrecordbasedanalysesacomparisonofapproachesusingplasmodesimulation
AT mamtanironac inverseprobabilityoftreatmentweightingandconfoundermissingnessinelectronichealthrecordbasedanalysesacomparisonofapproachesusingplasmodesimulation
AT liyun inverseprobabilityoftreatmentweightingandconfoundermissingnessinelectronichealthrecordbasedanalysesacomparisonofapproachesusingplasmodesimulation
AT griffithsandrad inverseprobabilityoftreatmentweightingandconfoundermissingnessinelectronichealthrecordbasedanalysesacomparisonofapproachesusingplasmodesimulation
AT calipgregorys inverseprobabilityoftreatmentweightingandconfoundermissingnessinelectronichealthrecordbasedanalysesacomparisonofapproachesusingplasmodesimulation
AT hubbardrebeccaa inverseprobabilityoftreatmentweightingandconfoundermissingnessinelectronichealthrecordbasedanalysesacomparisonofapproachesusingplasmodesimulation