Cargando…
Rigorous and rapid evidence assessment in digital health with the evidence DEFINED framework
Dozens of frameworks have been proposed to assess evidence for digital health interventions (DHIs), but existing frameworks may not facilitate DHI evidence reviews that meet the needs of stakeholder organizations including payers, health systems, trade organizations, and others. These organizations...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10232404/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37258851 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00836-5 |
_version_ | 1785051968618627072 |
---|---|
author | Silberman, Jordan Wicks, Paul Patel, Smit Sarlati, Siavash Park, Siyeon Korolev, Igor O. Carl, Jenna R. Owusu, Jocelynn T. Mishra, Vimal Kaur, Manpreet Willey, Vincent J. Sucala, Madalina L. Campellone, Tim R. Geoghegan, Cindy Rodriguez-Chavez, Isaac R. Vandendriessche, Benjamin Goldsack, Jennifer C. |
author_facet | Silberman, Jordan Wicks, Paul Patel, Smit Sarlati, Siavash Park, Siyeon Korolev, Igor O. Carl, Jenna R. Owusu, Jocelynn T. Mishra, Vimal Kaur, Manpreet Willey, Vincent J. Sucala, Madalina L. Campellone, Tim R. Geoghegan, Cindy Rodriguez-Chavez, Isaac R. Vandendriessche, Benjamin Goldsack, Jennifer C. |
author_sort | Silberman, Jordan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Dozens of frameworks have been proposed to assess evidence for digital health interventions (DHIs), but existing frameworks may not facilitate DHI evidence reviews that meet the needs of stakeholder organizations including payers, health systems, trade organizations, and others. These organizations may benefit from a DHI assessment framework that is both rigorous and rapid. Here we propose a framework to assess Evidence in Digital health for EFfectiveness of INterventions with Evaluative Depth (Evidence DEFINED). Designed for real-world use, the Evidence DEFINED Quick Start Guide may help streamline DHI assessment. A checklist is provided summarizing high-priority evidence considerations in digital health. Evidence-to-recommendation guidelines are proposed, specifying degrees of adoption that may be appropriate for a range of evidence quality levels. Evidence DEFINED differs from prior frameworks in its inclusion of unique elements designed for rigor and speed. Rigor is increased by addressing three gaps in prior frameworks. First, prior frameworks are not adapted adequately to address evidence considerations that are unique to digital health. Second, prior frameworks do not specify evidence quality criteria requiring increased vigilance for DHIs in the current regulatory context. Third, extant frameworks rarely leverage established, robust methodologies that were developed for non-digital interventions. Speed is achieved in the Evidence DEFINED Framework through screening optimization and deprioritization of steps that may have limited value. The primary goals of Evidence DEFINED are to a) facilitate standardized, rapid, rigorous DHI evidence assessment in organizations and b) guide digital health solutions providers who wish to generate evidence that drives DHI adoption. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10232404 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102324042023-06-02 Rigorous and rapid evidence assessment in digital health with the evidence DEFINED framework Silberman, Jordan Wicks, Paul Patel, Smit Sarlati, Siavash Park, Siyeon Korolev, Igor O. Carl, Jenna R. Owusu, Jocelynn T. Mishra, Vimal Kaur, Manpreet Willey, Vincent J. Sucala, Madalina L. Campellone, Tim R. Geoghegan, Cindy Rodriguez-Chavez, Isaac R. Vandendriessche, Benjamin Goldsack, Jennifer C. NPJ Digit Med Perspective Dozens of frameworks have been proposed to assess evidence for digital health interventions (DHIs), but existing frameworks may not facilitate DHI evidence reviews that meet the needs of stakeholder organizations including payers, health systems, trade organizations, and others. These organizations may benefit from a DHI assessment framework that is both rigorous and rapid. Here we propose a framework to assess Evidence in Digital health for EFfectiveness of INterventions with Evaluative Depth (Evidence DEFINED). Designed for real-world use, the Evidence DEFINED Quick Start Guide may help streamline DHI assessment. A checklist is provided summarizing high-priority evidence considerations in digital health. Evidence-to-recommendation guidelines are proposed, specifying degrees of adoption that may be appropriate for a range of evidence quality levels. Evidence DEFINED differs from prior frameworks in its inclusion of unique elements designed for rigor and speed. Rigor is increased by addressing three gaps in prior frameworks. First, prior frameworks are not adapted adequately to address evidence considerations that are unique to digital health. Second, prior frameworks do not specify evidence quality criteria requiring increased vigilance for DHIs in the current regulatory context. Third, extant frameworks rarely leverage established, robust methodologies that were developed for non-digital interventions. Speed is achieved in the Evidence DEFINED Framework through screening optimization and deprioritization of steps that may have limited value. The primary goals of Evidence DEFINED are to a) facilitate standardized, rapid, rigorous DHI evidence assessment in organizations and b) guide digital health solutions providers who wish to generate evidence that drives DHI adoption. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10232404/ /pubmed/37258851 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00836-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Perspective Silberman, Jordan Wicks, Paul Patel, Smit Sarlati, Siavash Park, Siyeon Korolev, Igor O. Carl, Jenna R. Owusu, Jocelynn T. Mishra, Vimal Kaur, Manpreet Willey, Vincent J. Sucala, Madalina L. Campellone, Tim R. Geoghegan, Cindy Rodriguez-Chavez, Isaac R. Vandendriessche, Benjamin Goldsack, Jennifer C. Rigorous and rapid evidence assessment in digital health with the evidence DEFINED framework |
title | Rigorous and rapid evidence assessment in digital health with the evidence DEFINED framework |
title_full | Rigorous and rapid evidence assessment in digital health with the evidence DEFINED framework |
title_fullStr | Rigorous and rapid evidence assessment in digital health with the evidence DEFINED framework |
title_full_unstemmed | Rigorous and rapid evidence assessment in digital health with the evidence DEFINED framework |
title_short | Rigorous and rapid evidence assessment in digital health with the evidence DEFINED framework |
title_sort | rigorous and rapid evidence assessment in digital health with the evidence defined framework |
topic | Perspective |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10232404/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37258851 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00836-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT silbermanjordan rigorousandrapidevidenceassessmentindigitalhealthwiththeevidencedefinedframework AT wickspaul rigorousandrapidevidenceassessmentindigitalhealthwiththeevidencedefinedframework AT patelsmit rigorousandrapidevidenceassessmentindigitalhealthwiththeevidencedefinedframework AT sarlatisiavash rigorousandrapidevidenceassessmentindigitalhealthwiththeevidencedefinedframework AT parksiyeon rigorousandrapidevidenceassessmentindigitalhealthwiththeevidencedefinedframework AT korolevigoro rigorousandrapidevidenceassessmentindigitalhealthwiththeevidencedefinedframework AT carljennar rigorousandrapidevidenceassessmentindigitalhealthwiththeevidencedefinedframework AT owusujocelynnt rigorousandrapidevidenceassessmentindigitalhealthwiththeevidencedefinedframework AT mishravimal rigorousandrapidevidenceassessmentindigitalhealthwiththeevidencedefinedframework AT kaurmanpreet rigorousandrapidevidenceassessmentindigitalhealthwiththeevidencedefinedframework AT willeyvincentj rigorousandrapidevidenceassessmentindigitalhealthwiththeevidencedefinedframework AT sucalamadalinal rigorousandrapidevidenceassessmentindigitalhealthwiththeevidencedefinedframework AT campellonetimr rigorousandrapidevidenceassessmentindigitalhealthwiththeevidencedefinedframework AT geoghegancindy rigorousandrapidevidenceassessmentindigitalhealthwiththeevidencedefinedframework AT rodriguezchavezisaacr rigorousandrapidevidenceassessmentindigitalhealthwiththeevidencedefinedframework AT vandendriesschebenjamin rigorousandrapidevidenceassessmentindigitalhealthwiththeevidencedefinedframework AT rigorousandrapidevidenceassessmentindigitalhealthwiththeevidencedefinedframework AT goldsackjenniferc rigorousandrapidevidenceassessmentindigitalhealthwiththeevidencedefinedframework |