Cargando…
Prevalence, risk factors and diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests for NAFLD in people with type 1 diabetes
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The epidemiology of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) is not yet elucidated. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests for NAFLD, to investigate the prevalence and severity of NAFLD, and to search for...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10232726/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37274774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100753 |
_version_ | 1785052048820011008 |
---|---|
author | Mertens, Jonathan Weyler, Jonas Dirinck, Eveline Vonghia, Luisa Kwanten, Wilhelmus J. Mortelmans, Laura Peleman, Cedric Chotkoe, Shivani Spinhoven, Maarten Vanhevel, Floris Van Gaal, Luc F. De Winter, Benedicte Y. De Block, Christophe E.M. Francque, Sven M. |
author_facet | Mertens, Jonathan Weyler, Jonas Dirinck, Eveline Vonghia, Luisa Kwanten, Wilhelmus J. Mortelmans, Laura Peleman, Cedric Chotkoe, Shivani Spinhoven, Maarten Vanhevel, Floris Van Gaal, Luc F. De Winter, Benedicte Y. De Block, Christophe E.M. Francque, Sven M. |
author_sort | Mertens, Jonathan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND & AIMS: The epidemiology of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) is not yet elucidated. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests for NAFLD, to investigate the prevalence and severity of NAFLD, and to search for factors contributing to NAFLD in people with T1D. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, we consecutively screened 530 adults with T1D from a tertiary care hospital, using ultrasound (US), vibration-controlled transient elastography equipped with liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and controlled attenuation parameter, and the fatty liver index. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) was performed in a representative subgroup of 132 individuals to validate the diagnostic accuracy of the non-invasive tests. RESULTS: Based on MRS as reference standard, US identified individuals with NAFLD with an AUROC of 0.98 (95% CI 0.95–1.00, sensitivity: 1.00, specificity: 0.96). The controlled attenuation parameter was also accurate with an AUROC of 0.85 (95% CI 0.77–0.93). Youden cut-off was ≥270 dB/m (sensitivity: 0.90, specificity: 0.74). The fatty liver index yielded a similar AUROC of 0.83 (95% CI 0.74–0.91), but the conventional cut-off used to rule in (≥60) had low sensitivity and specificity (0.62, 0.78). The prevalence of NAFLD in the overall cohort was 16.2% based on US. Metabolic syndrome was associated with NAFLD (OR: 2.35 [1.08–5.12], p = 0.031). The overall prevalence of LSM ≥8.0 kPa indicating significant fibrosis was 3.8%, but reached 13.2% in people with NAFLD. CONCLUSIONS: NAFLD prevalence in individuals with T1D is 16.2%, with approximately one in 10 featuring elevated LSM. US-based screening could be considered in people with T1D and metabolic syndrome. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: We aimed to report on the prevalence, disease severity, and risk factors of NAFLD in type 1 diabetes (T1D), while also tackling which non-invasive test for NAFLD is the most accurate. We found that ultrasound is the best test to diagnose NAFLD. NAFLD prevalence is 16.2%, and is associated with metabolic syndrome and BMI. Elevated liver stiffness indicating fibrosis is overall not prevalent in people with T1D (3.8%), but it reaches 13.2% in those with T1D and NAFLD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10232726 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102327262023-06-02 Prevalence, risk factors and diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests for NAFLD in people with type 1 diabetes Mertens, Jonathan Weyler, Jonas Dirinck, Eveline Vonghia, Luisa Kwanten, Wilhelmus J. Mortelmans, Laura Peleman, Cedric Chotkoe, Shivani Spinhoven, Maarten Vanhevel, Floris Van Gaal, Luc F. De Winter, Benedicte Y. De Block, Christophe E.M. Francque, Sven M. JHEP Rep Research Article BACKGROUND & AIMS: The epidemiology of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) is not yet elucidated. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests for NAFLD, to investigate the prevalence and severity of NAFLD, and to search for factors contributing to NAFLD in people with T1D. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, we consecutively screened 530 adults with T1D from a tertiary care hospital, using ultrasound (US), vibration-controlled transient elastography equipped with liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and controlled attenuation parameter, and the fatty liver index. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) was performed in a representative subgroup of 132 individuals to validate the diagnostic accuracy of the non-invasive tests. RESULTS: Based on MRS as reference standard, US identified individuals with NAFLD with an AUROC of 0.98 (95% CI 0.95–1.00, sensitivity: 1.00, specificity: 0.96). The controlled attenuation parameter was also accurate with an AUROC of 0.85 (95% CI 0.77–0.93). Youden cut-off was ≥270 dB/m (sensitivity: 0.90, specificity: 0.74). The fatty liver index yielded a similar AUROC of 0.83 (95% CI 0.74–0.91), but the conventional cut-off used to rule in (≥60) had low sensitivity and specificity (0.62, 0.78). The prevalence of NAFLD in the overall cohort was 16.2% based on US. Metabolic syndrome was associated with NAFLD (OR: 2.35 [1.08–5.12], p = 0.031). The overall prevalence of LSM ≥8.0 kPa indicating significant fibrosis was 3.8%, but reached 13.2% in people with NAFLD. CONCLUSIONS: NAFLD prevalence in individuals with T1D is 16.2%, with approximately one in 10 featuring elevated LSM. US-based screening could be considered in people with T1D and metabolic syndrome. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: We aimed to report on the prevalence, disease severity, and risk factors of NAFLD in type 1 diabetes (T1D), while also tackling which non-invasive test for NAFLD is the most accurate. We found that ultrasound is the best test to diagnose NAFLD. NAFLD prevalence is 16.2%, and is associated with metabolic syndrome and BMI. Elevated liver stiffness indicating fibrosis is overall not prevalent in people with T1D (3.8%), but it reaches 13.2% in those with T1D and NAFLD. Elsevier 2023-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10232726/ /pubmed/37274774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100753 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mertens, Jonathan Weyler, Jonas Dirinck, Eveline Vonghia, Luisa Kwanten, Wilhelmus J. Mortelmans, Laura Peleman, Cedric Chotkoe, Shivani Spinhoven, Maarten Vanhevel, Floris Van Gaal, Luc F. De Winter, Benedicte Y. De Block, Christophe E.M. Francque, Sven M. Prevalence, risk factors and diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests for NAFLD in people with type 1 diabetes |
title | Prevalence, risk factors and diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests for NAFLD in people with type 1 diabetes |
title_full | Prevalence, risk factors and diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests for NAFLD in people with type 1 diabetes |
title_fullStr | Prevalence, risk factors and diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests for NAFLD in people with type 1 diabetes |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevalence, risk factors and diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests for NAFLD in people with type 1 diabetes |
title_short | Prevalence, risk factors and diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests for NAFLD in people with type 1 diabetes |
title_sort | prevalence, risk factors and diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests for nafld in people with type 1 diabetes |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10232726/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37274774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100753 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mertensjonathan prevalenceriskfactorsanddiagnosticaccuracyofnoninvasivetestsfornafldinpeoplewithtype1diabetes AT weylerjonas prevalenceriskfactorsanddiagnosticaccuracyofnoninvasivetestsfornafldinpeoplewithtype1diabetes AT dirinckeveline prevalenceriskfactorsanddiagnosticaccuracyofnoninvasivetestsfornafldinpeoplewithtype1diabetes AT vonghialuisa prevalenceriskfactorsanddiagnosticaccuracyofnoninvasivetestsfornafldinpeoplewithtype1diabetes AT kwantenwilhelmusj prevalenceriskfactorsanddiagnosticaccuracyofnoninvasivetestsfornafldinpeoplewithtype1diabetes AT mortelmanslaura prevalenceriskfactorsanddiagnosticaccuracyofnoninvasivetestsfornafldinpeoplewithtype1diabetes AT pelemancedric prevalenceriskfactorsanddiagnosticaccuracyofnoninvasivetestsfornafldinpeoplewithtype1diabetes AT chotkoeshivani prevalenceriskfactorsanddiagnosticaccuracyofnoninvasivetestsfornafldinpeoplewithtype1diabetes AT spinhovenmaarten prevalenceriskfactorsanddiagnosticaccuracyofnoninvasivetestsfornafldinpeoplewithtype1diabetes AT vanhevelfloris prevalenceriskfactorsanddiagnosticaccuracyofnoninvasivetestsfornafldinpeoplewithtype1diabetes AT vangaallucf prevalenceriskfactorsanddiagnosticaccuracyofnoninvasivetestsfornafldinpeoplewithtype1diabetes AT dewinterbenedictey prevalenceriskfactorsanddiagnosticaccuracyofnoninvasivetestsfornafldinpeoplewithtype1diabetes AT deblockchristopheem prevalenceriskfactorsanddiagnosticaccuracyofnoninvasivetestsfornafldinpeoplewithtype1diabetes AT francquesvenm prevalenceriskfactorsanddiagnosticaccuracyofnoninvasivetestsfornafldinpeoplewithtype1diabetes |