Cargando…

Factors Influencing Admission Decisions in Skilled Nursing Facilities: Retrospective Quantitative Study

BACKGROUND: Occupancy rates within skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) in the United States have reached a record low. Understanding drivers of occupancy, including admission decisions, is critical for assessing the recovery of the long-term care sector as a whole. We provide the first comprehensive a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strickland, Caroline, Chi, Nancy, Ditz, Laura, Gomez, Luisa, Wagner, Brittin, Wang, Stanley, Lizotte, Daniel J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10233428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37195755
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/43518
_version_ 1785052230719635456
author Strickland, Caroline
Chi, Nancy
Ditz, Laura
Gomez, Luisa
Wagner, Brittin
Wang, Stanley
Lizotte, Daniel J
author_facet Strickland, Caroline
Chi, Nancy
Ditz, Laura
Gomez, Luisa
Wagner, Brittin
Wang, Stanley
Lizotte, Daniel J
author_sort Strickland, Caroline
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Occupancy rates within skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) in the United States have reached a record low. Understanding drivers of occupancy, including admission decisions, is critical for assessing the recovery of the long-term care sector as a whole. We provide the first comprehensive analysis of financial, clinical, and operational factors that impact whether a patient referral to an SNF is accepted or denied, using a large health informatics database. OBJECTIVE: Our key objectives were to describe the distribution of referrals sent to SNFs in terms of key referral- and facility-level features; analyze key financial, clinical, and operational variables and their relationship to admission decisions; and identify the key potential reasons behind referral decisions in the context of learning health systems. METHODS: We extracted and cleaned referral data from 627 SNFs from January 2020 to March 2022, including information on SNF daily operations (occupancy and nursing hours), referral-level factors (insurance type and primary diagnosis), and facility-level factors (overall 5-star rating and urban versus rural status). We computed descriptive statistics and applied regression modeling to identify and describe the relationships between these factors and referral decisions, considering them individually and controlling for other factors to understand their impact on the decision-making process. RESULTS: When analyzing daily operation values, no significant relationship between SNF occupancy or nursing hours and referral acceptance was observed (P>.05). By analyzing referral-level factors, we found that the primary diagnosis category and insurance type of the patient were significantly related to referral acceptance (P<.05). Referrals with primary diagnoses within the category “Diseases of the Musculoskeletal System” are least often denied whereas those with diagnoses within the “Mental Illness” category are most often denied (compared with other diagnosis categories). Furthermore, private insurance holders are least often denied whereas “medicaid” holders are most often denied (compared with other insurance types). When analyzing facility-level factors, we found that the overall 5-star rating and urban versus rural status of an SNF are significantly related to referral acceptance (P<.05). We found a positive but nonmonotonic relationship between the 5-star rating and referral acceptance rates, with the highest acceptance rates found among 5-star facilities. In addition, we found that SNFs in urban areas have lower acceptance rates than their rural counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: While many factors may influence a referral acceptance, care challenges associated with individual diagnoses and financial challenges associated with different remuneration types were found to be the strongest drivers. Understanding these drivers is essential in being more intentional in the process of accepting or denying referrals. We have interpreted our results using an adaptive leadership framework and suggested how SNFs can be more purposeful with their decisions while striving to achieve appropriate occupancy levels in ways that meet their goals and patients’ needs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10233428
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102334282023-06-02 Factors Influencing Admission Decisions in Skilled Nursing Facilities: Retrospective Quantitative Study Strickland, Caroline Chi, Nancy Ditz, Laura Gomez, Luisa Wagner, Brittin Wang, Stanley Lizotte, Daniel J J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Occupancy rates within skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) in the United States have reached a record low. Understanding drivers of occupancy, including admission decisions, is critical for assessing the recovery of the long-term care sector as a whole. We provide the first comprehensive analysis of financial, clinical, and operational factors that impact whether a patient referral to an SNF is accepted or denied, using a large health informatics database. OBJECTIVE: Our key objectives were to describe the distribution of referrals sent to SNFs in terms of key referral- and facility-level features; analyze key financial, clinical, and operational variables and their relationship to admission decisions; and identify the key potential reasons behind referral decisions in the context of learning health systems. METHODS: We extracted and cleaned referral data from 627 SNFs from January 2020 to March 2022, including information on SNF daily operations (occupancy and nursing hours), referral-level factors (insurance type and primary diagnosis), and facility-level factors (overall 5-star rating and urban versus rural status). We computed descriptive statistics and applied regression modeling to identify and describe the relationships between these factors and referral decisions, considering them individually and controlling for other factors to understand their impact on the decision-making process. RESULTS: When analyzing daily operation values, no significant relationship between SNF occupancy or nursing hours and referral acceptance was observed (P>.05). By analyzing referral-level factors, we found that the primary diagnosis category and insurance type of the patient were significantly related to referral acceptance (P<.05). Referrals with primary diagnoses within the category “Diseases of the Musculoskeletal System” are least often denied whereas those with diagnoses within the “Mental Illness” category are most often denied (compared with other diagnosis categories). Furthermore, private insurance holders are least often denied whereas “medicaid” holders are most often denied (compared with other insurance types). When analyzing facility-level factors, we found that the overall 5-star rating and urban versus rural status of an SNF are significantly related to referral acceptance (P<.05). We found a positive but nonmonotonic relationship between the 5-star rating and referral acceptance rates, with the highest acceptance rates found among 5-star facilities. In addition, we found that SNFs in urban areas have lower acceptance rates than their rural counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: While many factors may influence a referral acceptance, care challenges associated with individual diagnoses and financial challenges associated with different remuneration types were found to be the strongest drivers. Understanding these drivers is essential in being more intentional in the process of accepting or denying referrals. We have interpreted our results using an adaptive leadership framework and suggested how SNFs can be more purposeful with their decisions while striving to achieve appropriate occupancy levels in ways that meet their goals and patients’ needs. JMIR Publications 2023-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10233428/ /pubmed/37195755 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/43518 Text en ©Caroline Strickland, Nancy Chi, Laura Ditz, Luisa Gomez, Brittin Wagner, Stanley Wang, Daniel J Lizotte. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 17.05.2023. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Strickland, Caroline
Chi, Nancy
Ditz, Laura
Gomez, Luisa
Wagner, Brittin
Wang, Stanley
Lizotte, Daniel J
Factors Influencing Admission Decisions in Skilled Nursing Facilities: Retrospective Quantitative Study
title Factors Influencing Admission Decisions in Skilled Nursing Facilities: Retrospective Quantitative Study
title_full Factors Influencing Admission Decisions in Skilled Nursing Facilities: Retrospective Quantitative Study
title_fullStr Factors Influencing Admission Decisions in Skilled Nursing Facilities: Retrospective Quantitative Study
title_full_unstemmed Factors Influencing Admission Decisions in Skilled Nursing Facilities: Retrospective Quantitative Study
title_short Factors Influencing Admission Decisions in Skilled Nursing Facilities: Retrospective Quantitative Study
title_sort factors influencing admission decisions in skilled nursing facilities: retrospective quantitative study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10233428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37195755
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/43518
work_keys_str_mv AT stricklandcaroline factorsinfluencingadmissiondecisionsinskillednursingfacilitiesretrospectivequantitativestudy
AT chinancy factorsinfluencingadmissiondecisionsinskillednursingfacilitiesretrospectivequantitativestudy
AT ditzlaura factorsinfluencingadmissiondecisionsinskillednursingfacilitiesretrospectivequantitativestudy
AT gomezluisa factorsinfluencingadmissiondecisionsinskillednursingfacilitiesretrospectivequantitativestudy
AT wagnerbrittin factorsinfluencingadmissiondecisionsinskillednursingfacilitiesretrospectivequantitativestudy
AT wangstanley factorsinfluencingadmissiondecisionsinskillednursingfacilitiesretrospectivequantitativestudy
AT lizottedanielj factorsinfluencingadmissiondecisionsinskillednursingfacilitiesretrospectivequantitativestudy