Cargando…
Accuracy of Dengue, Chikungunya, and Zika diagnoses by primary healthcare physicians in Tegucigalpa, Honduras
BACKGROUND: Dengue, Chikungunya, and Zika are co-endemic in Honduras and are often misdiagnosed due to similar clinical and epidemiological behavior. Most arboviral infections reported in primary care are based on clinical diagnoses without laboratory confirmation. Therefore, the accuracy of physici...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10233517/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37264307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08346-1 |
_version_ | 1785052246664282112 |
---|---|
author | Mejía, María Fernanda Ávila Shu, Pei-Yun Ji, Dar-Der |
author_facet | Mejía, María Fernanda Ávila Shu, Pei-Yun Ji, Dar-Der |
author_sort | Mejía, María Fernanda Ávila |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Dengue, Chikungunya, and Zika are co-endemic in Honduras and are often misdiagnosed due to similar clinical and epidemiological behavior. Most arboviral infections reported in primary care are based on clinical diagnoses without laboratory confirmation. Therefore, the accuracy of physicians’ diagnoses and the factors that affect them needs to be evaluated. METHODS: A cross-sectional study with convenience sampling at primary healthcare centers was conducted from June to September 2016 and 2017. Clinical data and dried blood spots on Whatman 903 filter paper from 415 arboviral cases and 248 non-arboviral febrile cases were collected. Viral RNA was extracted from a 6-mm DBS paper disc and confirmed by RT-qPCR and sequencing. RESULTS: Only 30.84% of diagnostic accuracy was observed in physicians in primary care when comparing arboviral clinical diagnosis with RT-qPCR detection. Moreover, in Dengue and Zika clinical cases, only 8.23% and 27.08% were RT-qPCR confirmed, respectively. No Chikungunya cases were confirmed. In 2017, 20.96% of febrile cases were RT-qPCR confirmed arboviral infections. The symptoms of 45.5% of arboviral cases can fit more than one case definition for arboviruses. The “symptom compliance” and “patient with suspected close contact” were the criteria most utilized by physicians for arboviral diagnosis. The pattern of the epidemiological curves of the arboviral clinical cases didn’t match the one of the RT-qPCR confirmed cases. CONCLUSIONS: Low diagnostic accuracy for overall and individual arboviral infections was observed in physicians. Unspecific symptomatology, overlapping case definitions, and reported close contact to an arboviral patient might contribute to misdiagnosis. Without laboratory confirmation, surveillance data may not reflect the real behavior of these diseases and could impact health interventions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-023-08346-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10233517 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102335172023-06-01 Accuracy of Dengue, Chikungunya, and Zika diagnoses by primary healthcare physicians in Tegucigalpa, Honduras Mejía, María Fernanda Ávila Shu, Pei-Yun Ji, Dar-Der BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Dengue, Chikungunya, and Zika are co-endemic in Honduras and are often misdiagnosed due to similar clinical and epidemiological behavior. Most arboviral infections reported in primary care are based on clinical diagnoses without laboratory confirmation. Therefore, the accuracy of physicians’ diagnoses and the factors that affect them needs to be evaluated. METHODS: A cross-sectional study with convenience sampling at primary healthcare centers was conducted from June to September 2016 and 2017. Clinical data and dried blood spots on Whatman 903 filter paper from 415 arboviral cases and 248 non-arboviral febrile cases were collected. Viral RNA was extracted from a 6-mm DBS paper disc and confirmed by RT-qPCR and sequencing. RESULTS: Only 30.84% of diagnostic accuracy was observed in physicians in primary care when comparing arboviral clinical diagnosis with RT-qPCR detection. Moreover, in Dengue and Zika clinical cases, only 8.23% and 27.08% were RT-qPCR confirmed, respectively. No Chikungunya cases were confirmed. In 2017, 20.96% of febrile cases were RT-qPCR confirmed arboviral infections. The symptoms of 45.5% of arboviral cases can fit more than one case definition for arboviruses. The “symptom compliance” and “patient with suspected close contact” were the criteria most utilized by physicians for arboviral diagnosis. The pattern of the epidemiological curves of the arboviral clinical cases didn’t match the one of the RT-qPCR confirmed cases. CONCLUSIONS: Low diagnostic accuracy for overall and individual arboviral infections was observed in physicians. Unspecific symptomatology, overlapping case definitions, and reported close contact to an arboviral patient might contribute to misdiagnosis. Without laboratory confirmation, surveillance data may not reflect the real behavior of these diseases and could impact health interventions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-023-08346-1. BioMed Central 2023-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10233517/ /pubmed/37264307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08346-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mejía, María Fernanda Ávila Shu, Pei-Yun Ji, Dar-Der Accuracy of Dengue, Chikungunya, and Zika diagnoses by primary healthcare physicians in Tegucigalpa, Honduras |
title | Accuracy of Dengue, Chikungunya, and Zika diagnoses by primary healthcare physicians in Tegucigalpa, Honduras |
title_full | Accuracy of Dengue, Chikungunya, and Zika diagnoses by primary healthcare physicians in Tegucigalpa, Honduras |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of Dengue, Chikungunya, and Zika diagnoses by primary healthcare physicians in Tegucigalpa, Honduras |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of Dengue, Chikungunya, and Zika diagnoses by primary healthcare physicians in Tegucigalpa, Honduras |
title_short | Accuracy of Dengue, Chikungunya, and Zika diagnoses by primary healthcare physicians in Tegucigalpa, Honduras |
title_sort | accuracy of dengue, chikungunya, and zika diagnoses by primary healthcare physicians in tegucigalpa, honduras |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10233517/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37264307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08346-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mejiamariafernandaavila accuracyofdenguechikungunyaandzikadiagnosesbyprimaryhealthcarephysiciansintegucigalpahonduras AT shupeiyun accuracyofdenguechikungunyaandzikadiagnosesbyprimaryhealthcarephysiciansintegucigalpahonduras AT jidarder accuracyofdenguechikungunyaandzikadiagnosesbyprimaryhealthcarephysiciansintegucigalpahonduras |