Cargando…
Artificial intelligence in endoscopic ultrasonography: risk stratification of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have identified useful endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) features to predict the malignant potential of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, the results of the studies were not consistent. Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promising results in medicine....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10233610/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37274299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562848231177156 |
_version_ | 1785052295668432896 |
---|---|
author | Lu, Yi Chen, Lu Wu, Jiachuan Er, Limian Shi, Huihui Cheng, Weihui Chen, Ke Liu, Yuan Qiu, Bingfeng Xu, Qiancheng Feng, Yue Tang, Nan Wan, Fuchuan Sun, Jiachen Zhi, Min |
author_facet | Lu, Yi Chen, Lu Wu, Jiachuan Er, Limian Shi, Huihui Cheng, Weihui Chen, Ke Liu, Yuan Qiu, Bingfeng Xu, Qiancheng Feng, Yue Tang, Nan Wan, Fuchuan Sun, Jiachen Zhi, Min |
author_sort | Lu, Yi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Previous studies have identified useful endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) features to predict the malignant potential of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, the results of the studies were not consistent. Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promising results in medicine. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to build a risk stratification EUS-AI model to predict the malignancy potential of GISTs. DESIGN: This was a retrospective study with external validation. METHODS: We developed two models using EUS images from two hospitals to predict the GIST risk category. Model 1 was the four-category risk EUS-AI model, and Model 2 was the two-category risk EUS-AI model. The diagnostic performance of the models was validated with external cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 1320 images (880 were very low-risk, 269 were low-risk, 68 were intermediate-risk, and 103 were high-risk) were finally chosen for building the models and test sets, and a total of 656 images (211 were very low-risk, 266 were low-risk, 88 were intermediate-risk, and 91 were high-risk) were chosen for external validation. The overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for the four-category risk EUS-AI model in the external validation sets by tumor were 74.50%, 55.00%, 79.05%, 53.49%, and 81.63%, respectively. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for the two-category risk EUS-AI model for the prediction of very low-risk GISTs in the external validation sets by tumor were 86.25%, 94.44%, 79.55%, 79.07%, and 94.59%, respectively. CONCLUSION: We developed a EUS-AI model for the risk stratification of GISTs with promising results, which may complement current clinical practice in the management of GISTs. REGISTRATION: The study has been registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR2100051191). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10233610 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102336102023-06-02 Artificial intelligence in endoscopic ultrasonography: risk stratification of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors Lu, Yi Chen, Lu Wu, Jiachuan Er, Limian Shi, Huihui Cheng, Weihui Chen, Ke Liu, Yuan Qiu, Bingfeng Xu, Qiancheng Feng, Yue Tang, Nan Wan, Fuchuan Sun, Jiachen Zhi, Min Therap Adv Gastroenterol Original Research BACKGROUND: Previous studies have identified useful endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) features to predict the malignant potential of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, the results of the studies were not consistent. Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promising results in medicine. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to build a risk stratification EUS-AI model to predict the malignancy potential of GISTs. DESIGN: This was a retrospective study with external validation. METHODS: We developed two models using EUS images from two hospitals to predict the GIST risk category. Model 1 was the four-category risk EUS-AI model, and Model 2 was the two-category risk EUS-AI model. The diagnostic performance of the models was validated with external cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 1320 images (880 were very low-risk, 269 were low-risk, 68 were intermediate-risk, and 103 were high-risk) were finally chosen for building the models and test sets, and a total of 656 images (211 were very low-risk, 266 were low-risk, 88 were intermediate-risk, and 91 were high-risk) were chosen for external validation. The overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for the four-category risk EUS-AI model in the external validation sets by tumor were 74.50%, 55.00%, 79.05%, 53.49%, and 81.63%, respectively. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for the two-category risk EUS-AI model for the prediction of very low-risk GISTs in the external validation sets by tumor were 86.25%, 94.44%, 79.55%, 79.07%, and 94.59%, respectively. CONCLUSION: We developed a EUS-AI model for the risk stratification of GISTs with promising results, which may complement current clinical practice in the management of GISTs. REGISTRATION: The study has been registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR2100051191). SAGE Publications 2023-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10233610/ /pubmed/37274299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562848231177156 Text en © The Author(s), 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Lu, Yi Chen, Lu Wu, Jiachuan Er, Limian Shi, Huihui Cheng, Weihui Chen, Ke Liu, Yuan Qiu, Bingfeng Xu, Qiancheng Feng, Yue Tang, Nan Wan, Fuchuan Sun, Jiachen Zhi, Min Artificial intelligence in endoscopic ultrasonography: risk stratification of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors |
title | Artificial intelligence in endoscopic ultrasonography: risk
stratification of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors |
title_full | Artificial intelligence in endoscopic ultrasonography: risk
stratification of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors |
title_fullStr | Artificial intelligence in endoscopic ultrasonography: risk
stratification of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors |
title_full_unstemmed | Artificial intelligence in endoscopic ultrasonography: risk
stratification of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors |
title_short | Artificial intelligence in endoscopic ultrasonography: risk
stratification of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors |
title_sort | artificial intelligence in endoscopic ultrasonography: risk
stratification of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10233610/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37274299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562848231177156 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luyi artificialintelligenceinendoscopicultrasonographyriskstratificationofgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors AT chenlu artificialintelligenceinendoscopicultrasonographyriskstratificationofgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors AT wujiachuan artificialintelligenceinendoscopicultrasonographyriskstratificationofgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors AT erlimian artificialintelligenceinendoscopicultrasonographyriskstratificationofgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors AT shihuihui artificialintelligenceinendoscopicultrasonographyriskstratificationofgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors AT chengweihui artificialintelligenceinendoscopicultrasonographyriskstratificationofgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors AT chenke artificialintelligenceinendoscopicultrasonographyriskstratificationofgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors AT liuyuan artificialintelligenceinendoscopicultrasonographyriskstratificationofgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors AT qiubingfeng artificialintelligenceinendoscopicultrasonographyriskstratificationofgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors AT xuqiancheng artificialintelligenceinendoscopicultrasonographyriskstratificationofgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors AT fengyue artificialintelligenceinendoscopicultrasonographyriskstratificationofgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors AT tangnan artificialintelligenceinendoscopicultrasonographyriskstratificationofgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors AT wanfuchuan artificialintelligenceinendoscopicultrasonographyriskstratificationofgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors AT sunjiachen artificialintelligenceinendoscopicultrasonographyriskstratificationofgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors AT zhimin artificialintelligenceinendoscopicultrasonographyriskstratificationofgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors |