Cargando…

Artificial intelligence in endoscopic ultrasonography: risk stratification of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have identified useful endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) features to predict the malignant potential of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, the results of the studies were not consistent. Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promising results in medicine....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Yi, Chen, Lu, Wu, Jiachuan, Er, Limian, Shi, Huihui, Cheng, Weihui, Chen, Ke, Liu, Yuan, Qiu, Bingfeng, Xu, Qiancheng, Feng, Yue, Tang, Nan, Wan, Fuchuan, Sun, Jiachen, Zhi, Min
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10233610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37274299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562848231177156
_version_ 1785052295668432896
author Lu, Yi
Chen, Lu
Wu, Jiachuan
Er, Limian
Shi, Huihui
Cheng, Weihui
Chen, Ke
Liu, Yuan
Qiu, Bingfeng
Xu, Qiancheng
Feng, Yue
Tang, Nan
Wan, Fuchuan
Sun, Jiachen
Zhi, Min
author_facet Lu, Yi
Chen, Lu
Wu, Jiachuan
Er, Limian
Shi, Huihui
Cheng, Weihui
Chen, Ke
Liu, Yuan
Qiu, Bingfeng
Xu, Qiancheng
Feng, Yue
Tang, Nan
Wan, Fuchuan
Sun, Jiachen
Zhi, Min
author_sort Lu, Yi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous studies have identified useful endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) features to predict the malignant potential of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, the results of the studies were not consistent. Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promising results in medicine. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to build a risk stratification EUS-AI model to predict the malignancy potential of GISTs. DESIGN: This was a retrospective study with external validation. METHODS: We developed two models using EUS images from two hospitals to predict the GIST risk category. Model 1 was the four-category risk EUS-AI model, and Model 2 was the two-category risk EUS-AI model. The diagnostic performance of the models was validated with external cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 1320 images (880 were very low-risk, 269 were low-risk, 68 were intermediate-risk, and 103 were high-risk) were finally chosen for building the models and test sets, and a total of 656 images (211 were very low-risk, 266 were low-risk, 88 were intermediate-risk, and 91 were high-risk) were chosen for external validation. The overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for the four-category risk EUS-AI model in the external validation sets by tumor were 74.50%, 55.00%, 79.05%, 53.49%, and 81.63%, respectively. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for the two-category risk EUS-AI model for the prediction of very low-risk GISTs in the external validation sets by tumor were 86.25%, 94.44%, 79.55%, 79.07%, and 94.59%, respectively. CONCLUSION: We developed a EUS-AI model for the risk stratification of GISTs with promising results, which may complement current clinical practice in the management of GISTs. REGISTRATION: The study has been registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR2100051191).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10233610
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102336102023-06-02 Artificial intelligence in endoscopic ultrasonography: risk stratification of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors Lu, Yi Chen, Lu Wu, Jiachuan Er, Limian Shi, Huihui Cheng, Weihui Chen, Ke Liu, Yuan Qiu, Bingfeng Xu, Qiancheng Feng, Yue Tang, Nan Wan, Fuchuan Sun, Jiachen Zhi, Min Therap Adv Gastroenterol Original Research BACKGROUND: Previous studies have identified useful endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) features to predict the malignant potential of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, the results of the studies were not consistent. Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promising results in medicine. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to build a risk stratification EUS-AI model to predict the malignancy potential of GISTs. DESIGN: This was a retrospective study with external validation. METHODS: We developed two models using EUS images from two hospitals to predict the GIST risk category. Model 1 was the four-category risk EUS-AI model, and Model 2 was the two-category risk EUS-AI model. The diagnostic performance of the models was validated with external cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 1320 images (880 were very low-risk, 269 were low-risk, 68 were intermediate-risk, and 103 were high-risk) were finally chosen for building the models and test sets, and a total of 656 images (211 were very low-risk, 266 were low-risk, 88 were intermediate-risk, and 91 were high-risk) were chosen for external validation. The overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for the four-category risk EUS-AI model in the external validation sets by tumor were 74.50%, 55.00%, 79.05%, 53.49%, and 81.63%, respectively. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for the two-category risk EUS-AI model for the prediction of very low-risk GISTs in the external validation sets by tumor were 86.25%, 94.44%, 79.55%, 79.07%, and 94.59%, respectively. CONCLUSION: We developed a EUS-AI model for the risk stratification of GISTs with promising results, which may complement current clinical practice in the management of GISTs. REGISTRATION: The study has been registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR2100051191). SAGE Publications 2023-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10233610/ /pubmed/37274299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562848231177156 Text en © The Author(s), 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Lu, Yi
Chen, Lu
Wu, Jiachuan
Er, Limian
Shi, Huihui
Cheng, Weihui
Chen, Ke
Liu, Yuan
Qiu, Bingfeng
Xu, Qiancheng
Feng, Yue
Tang, Nan
Wan, Fuchuan
Sun, Jiachen
Zhi, Min
Artificial intelligence in endoscopic ultrasonography: risk stratification of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors
title Artificial intelligence in endoscopic ultrasonography: risk stratification of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors
title_full Artificial intelligence in endoscopic ultrasonography: risk stratification of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors
title_fullStr Artificial intelligence in endoscopic ultrasonography: risk stratification of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors
title_full_unstemmed Artificial intelligence in endoscopic ultrasonography: risk stratification of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors
title_short Artificial intelligence in endoscopic ultrasonography: risk stratification of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors
title_sort artificial intelligence in endoscopic ultrasonography: risk stratification of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10233610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37274299
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562848231177156
work_keys_str_mv AT luyi artificialintelligenceinendoscopicultrasonographyriskstratificationofgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors
AT chenlu artificialintelligenceinendoscopicultrasonographyriskstratificationofgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors
AT wujiachuan artificialintelligenceinendoscopicultrasonographyriskstratificationofgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors
AT erlimian artificialintelligenceinendoscopicultrasonographyriskstratificationofgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors
AT shihuihui artificialintelligenceinendoscopicultrasonographyriskstratificationofgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors
AT chengweihui artificialintelligenceinendoscopicultrasonographyriskstratificationofgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors
AT chenke artificialintelligenceinendoscopicultrasonographyriskstratificationofgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors
AT liuyuan artificialintelligenceinendoscopicultrasonographyriskstratificationofgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors
AT qiubingfeng artificialintelligenceinendoscopicultrasonographyriskstratificationofgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors
AT xuqiancheng artificialintelligenceinendoscopicultrasonographyriskstratificationofgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors
AT fengyue artificialintelligenceinendoscopicultrasonographyriskstratificationofgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors
AT tangnan artificialintelligenceinendoscopicultrasonographyriskstratificationofgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors
AT wanfuchuan artificialintelligenceinendoscopicultrasonographyriskstratificationofgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors
AT sunjiachen artificialintelligenceinendoscopicultrasonographyriskstratificationofgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors
AT zhimin artificialintelligenceinendoscopicultrasonographyriskstratificationofgastricgastrointestinalstromaltumors