Cargando…
Exploring Regional Fine Particulate Matter (PM(2.5)) Exposure Reduction Pathways Using an Optimal Power Flow Model: The Case of the Illinois Power Grid
[Image: see text] This work develops an exposure-based optimal power flow model (OPF) that accounts for fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) exposure from electricity generation unit (EGU) emissions. Advancing health-based dispatch models to an OPF with transmission constraints and reactive power flow...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10233793/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37191255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c08698 |
Sumario: | [Image: see text] This work develops an exposure-based optimal power flow model (OPF) that accounts for fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) exposure from electricity generation unit (EGU) emissions. Advancing health-based dispatch models to an OPF with transmission constraints and reactive power flow is an essential development given its utility for short- and long-term planning by system operators. The model enables the assessment of the exposure mitigation potential and the feasibility of intervention strategies while still prioritizing system costs and network stability. A representation of the Illinois power grid is developed to demonstrate how the model can inform decision making. Three scenarios minimizing dispatch costs and/or exposure damages are simulated. Other interventions assessed include adopting best-available EGU emission control technologies, having higher renewable generation, and relocating high-polluting EGUs. Neglecting transmission constraints fails to account for 4% of exposure damages ($60 M/y) and dispatch costs ($240 M/y). Accounting for exposure in the OPF reduces damages by 70%, a reduction on the order of that achieved by high renewable integration. About 80% of all exposure is attributed to EGUs fulfilling only 25% of electricity demand. Siting these EGUs in low-exposure zones avoids 43% of all exposure. Operation and cost advantages inherent to each strategy beyond exposure reduction suggest their collective adoption for maximum benefits. |
---|