Cargando…

Exploring Regional Fine Particulate Matter (PM(2.5)) Exposure Reduction Pathways Using an Optimal Power Flow Model: The Case of the Illinois Power Grid

[Image: see text] This work develops an exposure-based optimal power flow model (OPF) that accounts for fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) exposure from electricity generation unit (EGU) emissions. Advancing health-based dispatch models to an OPF with transmission constraints and reactive power flow...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bin Thaneya, Ahmad, Horvath, Arpad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10233793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37191255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c08698
_version_ 1785052336034414592
author Bin Thaneya, Ahmad
Horvath, Arpad
author_facet Bin Thaneya, Ahmad
Horvath, Arpad
author_sort Bin Thaneya, Ahmad
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] This work develops an exposure-based optimal power flow model (OPF) that accounts for fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) exposure from electricity generation unit (EGU) emissions. Advancing health-based dispatch models to an OPF with transmission constraints and reactive power flow is an essential development given its utility for short- and long-term planning by system operators. The model enables the assessment of the exposure mitigation potential and the feasibility of intervention strategies while still prioritizing system costs and network stability. A representation of the Illinois power grid is developed to demonstrate how the model can inform decision making. Three scenarios minimizing dispatch costs and/or exposure damages are simulated. Other interventions assessed include adopting best-available EGU emission control technologies, having higher renewable generation, and relocating high-polluting EGUs. Neglecting transmission constraints fails to account for 4% of exposure damages ($60 M/y) and dispatch costs ($240 M/y). Accounting for exposure in the OPF reduces damages by 70%, a reduction on the order of that achieved by high renewable integration. About 80% of all exposure is attributed to EGUs fulfilling only 25% of electricity demand. Siting these EGUs in low-exposure zones avoids 43% of all exposure. Operation and cost advantages inherent to each strategy beyond exposure reduction suggest their collective adoption for maximum benefits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10233793
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102337932023-06-02 Exploring Regional Fine Particulate Matter (PM(2.5)) Exposure Reduction Pathways Using an Optimal Power Flow Model: The Case of the Illinois Power Grid Bin Thaneya, Ahmad Horvath, Arpad Environ Sci Technol [Image: see text] This work develops an exposure-based optimal power flow model (OPF) that accounts for fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) exposure from electricity generation unit (EGU) emissions. Advancing health-based dispatch models to an OPF with transmission constraints and reactive power flow is an essential development given its utility for short- and long-term planning by system operators. The model enables the assessment of the exposure mitigation potential and the feasibility of intervention strategies while still prioritizing system costs and network stability. A representation of the Illinois power grid is developed to demonstrate how the model can inform decision making. Three scenarios minimizing dispatch costs and/or exposure damages are simulated. Other interventions assessed include adopting best-available EGU emission control technologies, having higher renewable generation, and relocating high-polluting EGUs. Neglecting transmission constraints fails to account for 4% of exposure damages ($60 M/y) and dispatch costs ($240 M/y). Accounting for exposure in the OPF reduces damages by 70%, a reduction on the order of that achieved by high renewable integration. About 80% of all exposure is attributed to EGUs fulfilling only 25% of electricity demand. Siting these EGUs in low-exposure zones avoids 43% of all exposure. Operation and cost advantages inherent to each strategy beyond exposure reduction suggest their collective adoption for maximum benefits. American Chemical Society 2023-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10233793/ /pubmed/37191255 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c08698 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Bin Thaneya, Ahmad
Horvath, Arpad
Exploring Regional Fine Particulate Matter (PM(2.5)) Exposure Reduction Pathways Using an Optimal Power Flow Model: The Case of the Illinois Power Grid
title Exploring Regional Fine Particulate Matter (PM(2.5)) Exposure Reduction Pathways Using an Optimal Power Flow Model: The Case of the Illinois Power Grid
title_full Exploring Regional Fine Particulate Matter (PM(2.5)) Exposure Reduction Pathways Using an Optimal Power Flow Model: The Case of the Illinois Power Grid
title_fullStr Exploring Regional Fine Particulate Matter (PM(2.5)) Exposure Reduction Pathways Using an Optimal Power Flow Model: The Case of the Illinois Power Grid
title_full_unstemmed Exploring Regional Fine Particulate Matter (PM(2.5)) Exposure Reduction Pathways Using an Optimal Power Flow Model: The Case of the Illinois Power Grid
title_short Exploring Regional Fine Particulate Matter (PM(2.5)) Exposure Reduction Pathways Using an Optimal Power Flow Model: The Case of the Illinois Power Grid
title_sort exploring regional fine particulate matter (pm(2.5)) exposure reduction pathways using an optimal power flow model: the case of the illinois power grid
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10233793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37191255
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c08698
work_keys_str_mv AT binthaneyaahmad exploringregionalfineparticulatematterpm25exposurereductionpathwaysusinganoptimalpowerflowmodelthecaseoftheillinoispowergrid
AT horvatharpad exploringregionalfineparticulatematterpm25exposurereductionpathwaysusinganoptimalpowerflowmodelthecaseoftheillinoispowergrid