Cargando…
Development and validation of an instrument to measure the Micro-Learning Environment of Students (MLEM)
BACKGROUND: There are multiple instruments to measure different learning environments but no valid and reliable instrument is present for measuring the micro-learning environment. This study aimed to develop and validate an instrument to measure the micro-learning environment of students. Measuring...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10233888/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37259136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04381-3 |
_version_ | 1785052360394932224 |
---|---|
author | Akbar, Zainab Khan, Rehan Ahmed Khan, Humaira Fayyaz Yasmeen, Rahila |
author_facet | Akbar, Zainab Khan, Rehan Ahmed Khan, Humaira Fayyaz Yasmeen, Rahila |
author_sort | Akbar, Zainab |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There are multiple instruments to measure different learning environments but no valid and reliable instrument is present for measuring the micro-learning environment. This study aimed to develop and validate an instrument to measure the micro-learning environment of students. Measuring the micro-learning environment can give insight into the real-life experiences of students and enlighten us about the disparity between taught, delivered, and learned curricula. METHODS: Multi-institutional Mixed methods study design with consecutive qualitative and, quantitative components was used based on information processing theory. Literature review, results of semi-structured interviews, and focus group discussion were combined to develop a questionnaire. Content and response process validity were established followed by pilot testing, reliability calculation, and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. RESULTS: A forty-nine-item preliminary draft instrument was reduced to a total of twenty-four items final instrument having five themes regarding teaching practices, learners support, competence in teaching, progressive faculty, and teaching environment. The values of SCVI/Ave and S-CVI/UA were calculated to be 0.92 and 0.62 respectively. Reliability was calculated to be 0.94. Fit indices values were within the normal range. CONCLUSION: The instrument for measuring the micro-learning environment has excellent content, construct, response process validity, and reliability. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-023-04381-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10233888 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102338882023-06-02 Development and validation of an instrument to measure the Micro-Learning Environment of Students (MLEM) Akbar, Zainab Khan, Rehan Ahmed Khan, Humaira Fayyaz Yasmeen, Rahila BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: There are multiple instruments to measure different learning environments but no valid and reliable instrument is present for measuring the micro-learning environment. This study aimed to develop and validate an instrument to measure the micro-learning environment of students. Measuring the micro-learning environment can give insight into the real-life experiences of students and enlighten us about the disparity between taught, delivered, and learned curricula. METHODS: Multi-institutional Mixed methods study design with consecutive qualitative and, quantitative components was used based on information processing theory. Literature review, results of semi-structured interviews, and focus group discussion were combined to develop a questionnaire. Content and response process validity were established followed by pilot testing, reliability calculation, and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. RESULTS: A forty-nine-item preliminary draft instrument was reduced to a total of twenty-four items final instrument having five themes regarding teaching practices, learners support, competence in teaching, progressive faculty, and teaching environment. The values of SCVI/Ave and S-CVI/UA were calculated to be 0.92 and 0.62 respectively. Reliability was calculated to be 0.94. Fit indices values were within the normal range. CONCLUSION: The instrument for measuring the micro-learning environment has excellent content, construct, response process validity, and reliability. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-023-04381-3. BioMed Central 2023-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10233888/ /pubmed/37259136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04381-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Akbar, Zainab Khan, Rehan Ahmed Khan, Humaira Fayyaz Yasmeen, Rahila Development and validation of an instrument to measure the Micro-Learning Environment of Students (MLEM) |
title | Development and validation of an instrument to measure the Micro-Learning Environment of Students (MLEM) |
title_full | Development and validation of an instrument to measure the Micro-Learning Environment of Students (MLEM) |
title_fullStr | Development and validation of an instrument to measure the Micro-Learning Environment of Students (MLEM) |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and validation of an instrument to measure the Micro-Learning Environment of Students (MLEM) |
title_short | Development and validation of an instrument to measure the Micro-Learning Environment of Students (MLEM) |
title_sort | development and validation of an instrument to measure the micro-learning environment of students (mlem) |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10233888/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37259136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04381-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT akbarzainab developmentandvalidationofaninstrumenttomeasurethemicrolearningenvironmentofstudentsmlem AT khanrehanahmed developmentandvalidationofaninstrumenttomeasurethemicrolearningenvironmentofstudentsmlem AT khanhumairafayyaz developmentandvalidationofaninstrumenttomeasurethemicrolearningenvironmentofstudentsmlem AT yasmeenrahila developmentandvalidationofaninstrumenttomeasurethemicrolearningenvironmentofstudentsmlem |