Cargando…
Comparison of epidemiologic factors and eye manifestations of twin children with controls
PURPOSE: The present study was aimed to compare the epidemiological and ocular findings of twin children in comparison with non- twin age matched individuals as their control. METHODS: In this cross sectional study, a total of 90 twins (180 cases) were compared with 182 non- twin matched children. A...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10233910/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37264366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-02983-5 |
_version_ | 1785052365897859072 |
---|---|
author | Rajavi, Zhale Sabbaghi, Hamideh Hasani, Reza Behradfar, Narges Abdi, Saeid Kheiri, Bahareh Haseli-Mofrad, Azadeh |
author_facet | Rajavi, Zhale Sabbaghi, Hamideh Hasani, Reza Behradfar, Narges Abdi, Saeid Kheiri, Bahareh Haseli-Mofrad, Azadeh |
author_sort | Rajavi, Zhale |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The present study was aimed to compare the epidemiological and ocular findings of twin children in comparison with non- twin age matched individuals as their control. METHODS: In this cross sectional study, a total of 90 twins (180 cases) were compared with 182 non- twin matched children. All the study participants were examined by a comprehensive ophthalmic examination including measurement of the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), cycloplegic refraction, ocular deviation, strabismus as well as the anterior and posterior ophthalmic examinations. Demographic information of children were collected by using an organized questionnaire. Monozygotic twins were considered if there were similarity of their phenotypic characteristics and gender, otherwise the twins were considered as dizygotic. RESULTS: The mirror- image twins (MIT) was defined according to the laterality of symmetrical ocular characteristics of twins. In this study, the mean age of the study participants was 7.08±4.42 and 7.58±3.99 years in twins and non-twins groups, respectively (P=0.253). Among the twins, 27 (30%) were monozygotic. Refractive form of MIT was seen in 5 twins (2.8%). The spherical refractive error was more hyperopic in twins compared to non- twins (P=0.041). BCVA in the twin group (0.07±0.16LogMAR) was significantly worse than non-twins (0.03±0.08LogMAR, P < 0.001) and higher percentage of them were amblyopic (37.2% versus 10.4%, P=0.005). Twin and controls had strabismus in 17.2% and 1.6%, respectively (P < 0.001). Regarding the comparison between mono- and dizygotic twins, more significant percentage of monozygotic twins had amblyopia (P=0.004) and strabismus (P=0.047). Multivariate analysis showed significant correlation among low gestational age and female gender, low birth weight and seizure. CONCLUSION: Female sex, less gestational age, low birth weight, amblyopia and strabismus were significantly higher in twins. Therefore, it is important to check their refractive error, amblyopia and strabismus to prevent their further complications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10233910 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102339102023-06-02 Comparison of epidemiologic factors and eye manifestations of twin children with controls Rajavi, Zhale Sabbaghi, Hamideh Hasani, Reza Behradfar, Narges Abdi, Saeid Kheiri, Bahareh Haseli-Mofrad, Azadeh BMC Ophthalmol Research PURPOSE: The present study was aimed to compare the epidemiological and ocular findings of twin children in comparison with non- twin age matched individuals as their control. METHODS: In this cross sectional study, a total of 90 twins (180 cases) were compared with 182 non- twin matched children. All the study participants were examined by a comprehensive ophthalmic examination including measurement of the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), cycloplegic refraction, ocular deviation, strabismus as well as the anterior and posterior ophthalmic examinations. Demographic information of children were collected by using an organized questionnaire. Monozygotic twins were considered if there were similarity of their phenotypic characteristics and gender, otherwise the twins were considered as dizygotic. RESULTS: The mirror- image twins (MIT) was defined according to the laterality of symmetrical ocular characteristics of twins. In this study, the mean age of the study participants was 7.08±4.42 and 7.58±3.99 years in twins and non-twins groups, respectively (P=0.253). Among the twins, 27 (30%) were monozygotic. Refractive form of MIT was seen in 5 twins (2.8%). The spherical refractive error was more hyperopic in twins compared to non- twins (P=0.041). BCVA in the twin group (0.07±0.16LogMAR) was significantly worse than non-twins (0.03±0.08LogMAR, P < 0.001) and higher percentage of them were amblyopic (37.2% versus 10.4%, P=0.005). Twin and controls had strabismus in 17.2% and 1.6%, respectively (P < 0.001). Regarding the comparison between mono- and dizygotic twins, more significant percentage of monozygotic twins had amblyopia (P=0.004) and strabismus (P=0.047). Multivariate analysis showed significant correlation among low gestational age and female gender, low birth weight and seizure. CONCLUSION: Female sex, less gestational age, low birth weight, amblyopia and strabismus were significantly higher in twins. Therefore, it is important to check their refractive error, amblyopia and strabismus to prevent their further complications. BioMed Central 2023-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10233910/ /pubmed/37264366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-02983-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Rajavi, Zhale Sabbaghi, Hamideh Hasani, Reza Behradfar, Narges Abdi, Saeid Kheiri, Bahareh Haseli-Mofrad, Azadeh Comparison of epidemiologic factors and eye manifestations of twin children with controls |
title | Comparison of epidemiologic factors and eye manifestations of twin children with controls |
title_full | Comparison of epidemiologic factors and eye manifestations of twin children with controls |
title_fullStr | Comparison of epidemiologic factors and eye manifestations of twin children with controls |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of epidemiologic factors and eye manifestations of twin children with controls |
title_short | Comparison of epidemiologic factors and eye manifestations of twin children with controls |
title_sort | comparison of epidemiologic factors and eye manifestations of twin children with controls |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10233910/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37264366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-023-02983-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rajavizhale comparisonofepidemiologicfactorsandeyemanifestationsoftwinchildrenwithcontrols AT sabbaghihamideh comparisonofepidemiologicfactorsandeyemanifestationsoftwinchildrenwithcontrols AT hasanireza comparisonofepidemiologicfactorsandeyemanifestationsoftwinchildrenwithcontrols AT behradfarnarges comparisonofepidemiologicfactorsandeyemanifestationsoftwinchildrenwithcontrols AT abdisaeid comparisonofepidemiologicfactorsandeyemanifestationsoftwinchildrenwithcontrols AT kheiribahareh comparisonofepidemiologicfactorsandeyemanifestationsoftwinchildrenwithcontrols AT haselimofradazadeh comparisonofepidemiologicfactorsandeyemanifestationsoftwinchildrenwithcontrols |