Cargando…
Breed identification using breed-informative SNPs and machine learning based on whole genome sequence data and SNP chip data
BACKGROUND: Breed identification is useful in a variety of biological contexts. Breed identification usually involves two stages, i.e., detection of breed-informative SNPs and breed assignment. For both stages, there are several methods proposed. However, what is the optimal combination of these met...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10234014/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37259083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40104-023-00880-x |
_version_ | 1785052386159493120 |
---|---|
author | Zhao, Changheng Wang, Dan Teng, Jun Yang, Cheng Zhang, Xinyi Wei, Xianming Zhang, Qin |
author_facet | Zhao, Changheng Wang, Dan Teng, Jun Yang, Cheng Zhang, Xinyi Wei, Xianming Zhang, Qin |
author_sort | Zhao, Changheng |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Breed identification is useful in a variety of biological contexts. Breed identification usually involves two stages, i.e., detection of breed-informative SNPs and breed assignment. For both stages, there are several methods proposed. However, what is the optimal combination of these methods remain unclear. In this study, using the whole genome sequence data available for 13 cattle breeds from Run 8 of the 1,000 Bull Genomes Project, we compared the combinations of three methods (Delta, F(ST), and I(n)) for breed-informative SNP detection and five machine learning methods (KNN, SVM, RF, NB, and ANN) for breed assignment with respect to different reference population sizes and difference numbers of most breed-informative SNPs. In addition, we evaluated the accuracy of breed identification using SNP chip data of different densities. RESULTS: We found that all combinations performed quite well with identification accuracies over 95% in all scenarios. However, there was no combination which performed the best and robust across all scenarios. We proposed to integrate the three breed-informative detection methods, named DFI, and integrate the three machine learning methods, KNN, SVM, and RF, named KSR. We found that the combination of these two integrated methods outperformed the other combinations with accuracies over 99% in most cases and was very robust in all scenarios. The accuracies from using SNP chip data were only slightly lower than that from using sequence data in most cases. CONCLUSIONS: The current study showed that the combination of DFI and KSR was the optimal strategy. Using sequence data resulted in higher accuracies than using chip data in most cases. However, the differences were generally small. In view of the cost of genotyping, using chip data is also a good option for breed identification. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40104-023-00880-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10234014 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102340142023-06-02 Breed identification using breed-informative SNPs and machine learning based on whole genome sequence data and SNP chip data Zhao, Changheng Wang, Dan Teng, Jun Yang, Cheng Zhang, Xinyi Wei, Xianming Zhang, Qin J Anim Sci Biotechnol Research BACKGROUND: Breed identification is useful in a variety of biological contexts. Breed identification usually involves two stages, i.e., detection of breed-informative SNPs and breed assignment. For both stages, there are several methods proposed. However, what is the optimal combination of these methods remain unclear. In this study, using the whole genome sequence data available for 13 cattle breeds from Run 8 of the 1,000 Bull Genomes Project, we compared the combinations of three methods (Delta, F(ST), and I(n)) for breed-informative SNP detection and five machine learning methods (KNN, SVM, RF, NB, and ANN) for breed assignment with respect to different reference population sizes and difference numbers of most breed-informative SNPs. In addition, we evaluated the accuracy of breed identification using SNP chip data of different densities. RESULTS: We found that all combinations performed quite well with identification accuracies over 95% in all scenarios. However, there was no combination which performed the best and robust across all scenarios. We proposed to integrate the three breed-informative detection methods, named DFI, and integrate the three machine learning methods, KNN, SVM, and RF, named KSR. We found that the combination of these two integrated methods outperformed the other combinations with accuracies over 99% in most cases and was very robust in all scenarios. The accuracies from using SNP chip data were only slightly lower than that from using sequence data in most cases. CONCLUSIONS: The current study showed that the combination of DFI and KSR was the optimal strategy. Using sequence data resulted in higher accuracies than using chip data in most cases. However, the differences were generally small. In view of the cost of genotyping, using chip data is also a good option for breed identification. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40104-023-00880-x. BioMed Central 2023-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10234014/ /pubmed/37259083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40104-023-00880-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Zhao, Changheng Wang, Dan Teng, Jun Yang, Cheng Zhang, Xinyi Wei, Xianming Zhang, Qin Breed identification using breed-informative SNPs and machine learning based on whole genome sequence data and SNP chip data |
title | Breed identification using breed-informative SNPs and machine learning based on whole genome sequence data and SNP chip data |
title_full | Breed identification using breed-informative SNPs and machine learning based on whole genome sequence data and SNP chip data |
title_fullStr | Breed identification using breed-informative SNPs and machine learning based on whole genome sequence data and SNP chip data |
title_full_unstemmed | Breed identification using breed-informative SNPs and machine learning based on whole genome sequence data and SNP chip data |
title_short | Breed identification using breed-informative SNPs and machine learning based on whole genome sequence data and SNP chip data |
title_sort | breed identification using breed-informative snps and machine learning based on whole genome sequence data and snp chip data |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10234014/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37259083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40104-023-00880-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhaochangheng breedidentificationusingbreedinformativesnpsandmachinelearningbasedonwholegenomesequencedataandsnpchipdata AT wangdan breedidentificationusingbreedinformativesnpsandmachinelearningbasedonwholegenomesequencedataandsnpchipdata AT tengjun breedidentificationusingbreedinformativesnpsandmachinelearningbasedonwholegenomesequencedataandsnpchipdata AT yangcheng breedidentificationusingbreedinformativesnpsandmachinelearningbasedonwholegenomesequencedataandsnpchipdata AT zhangxinyi breedidentificationusingbreedinformativesnpsandmachinelearningbasedonwholegenomesequencedataandsnpchipdata AT weixianming breedidentificationusingbreedinformativesnpsandmachinelearningbasedonwholegenomesequencedataandsnpchipdata AT zhangqin breedidentificationusingbreedinformativesnpsandmachinelearningbasedonwholegenomesequencedataandsnpchipdata |