Cargando…

Comparative short‐term efficacy of endoscopic sinus surgery and biological therapies in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: A network meta‐analysis

BACKGROUND: To compare the safety and efficacy between endoscopic sinus surgery and different biologics in treating chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in adults by reviewing the existing clinical trials. METHODS: Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were conducted by 2 independent revie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Jiani, Wang, Huan, Zhang, Chen, Shi, Le, Zhang, Qianqian, Song, Xiaole, Wang, Dehui, Hu, Li, Yu, Hongmeng, Sun, Xicai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10234113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37357547
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clt2.12269
_version_ 1785052410258915328
author Chen, Jiani
Wang, Huan
Zhang, Chen
Shi, Le
Zhang, Qianqian
Song, Xiaole
Wang, Dehui
Hu, Li
Yu, Hongmeng
Sun, Xicai
author_facet Chen, Jiani
Wang, Huan
Zhang, Chen
Shi, Le
Zhang, Qianqian
Song, Xiaole
Wang, Dehui
Hu, Li
Yu, Hongmeng
Sun, Xicai
author_sort Chen, Jiani
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To compare the safety and efficacy between endoscopic sinus surgery and different biologics in treating chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in adults by reviewing the existing clinical trials. METHODS: Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were conducted by 2 independent reviewers according to the PRISMA recommendations and any disagreement was resolved by a third investigator. Outcomes were measured through a random‐effects model. We searched Embase, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and other relevant sources from its inception to April 30, 2022. We included randomized controlled trials(RCTs) involving endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) or biologics in treating adult patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Studies involving other miscellaneous diseases, non‐RCT design, and insufficient participants or follow‐up were excluded. RESULTS: In this systematic review, five RCTs and 1748 patients were included. All the biologics, as well as ESS, could significantly improve key nasal outcomes in CRSwNP both at 6 months and 1 year. Dupilumab exhibited better efficacy than ESS in improving SNOT‐22 scores at one year. However, ESS showed superiority over three biologics in improving nasal congestion scores (NCS) at two various time points, except for better efficacy of Dupilumab at 1 year. For the loss of smell scores, a greater improvement was observed in the Dupilumab cohort compared with other biologics and even ESS counterparts. Safety analysis showed no significant difference between the ESS cohort and biologic treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, ESS showed comparable improvement in quality of life and symptoms to Omalizumab, Mepolizumab, and Benralizumab. Dupilumab seems to be more effective than ESS in selected items, whereas head‐to‐head trials and real‐world studies are urgent to compare their efficacy. Our findings also showed that biologics could be applied as alternative or adjuvant therapy for uncontrolled severe CRSwNP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10234113
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102341132023-06-02 Comparative short‐term efficacy of endoscopic sinus surgery and biological therapies in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: A network meta‐analysis Chen, Jiani Wang, Huan Zhang, Chen Shi, Le Zhang, Qianqian Song, Xiaole Wang, Dehui Hu, Li Yu, Hongmeng Sun, Xicai Clin Transl Allergy Original Article BACKGROUND: To compare the safety and efficacy between endoscopic sinus surgery and different biologics in treating chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in adults by reviewing the existing clinical trials. METHODS: Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were conducted by 2 independent reviewers according to the PRISMA recommendations and any disagreement was resolved by a third investigator. Outcomes were measured through a random‐effects model. We searched Embase, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and other relevant sources from its inception to April 30, 2022. We included randomized controlled trials(RCTs) involving endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) or biologics in treating adult patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Studies involving other miscellaneous diseases, non‐RCT design, and insufficient participants or follow‐up were excluded. RESULTS: In this systematic review, five RCTs and 1748 patients were included. All the biologics, as well as ESS, could significantly improve key nasal outcomes in CRSwNP both at 6 months and 1 year. Dupilumab exhibited better efficacy than ESS in improving SNOT‐22 scores at one year. However, ESS showed superiority over three biologics in improving nasal congestion scores (NCS) at two various time points, except for better efficacy of Dupilumab at 1 year. For the loss of smell scores, a greater improvement was observed in the Dupilumab cohort compared with other biologics and even ESS counterparts. Safety analysis showed no significant difference between the ESS cohort and biologic treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, ESS showed comparable improvement in quality of life and symptoms to Omalizumab, Mepolizumab, and Benralizumab. Dupilumab seems to be more effective than ESS in selected items, whereas head‐to‐head trials and real‐world studies are urgent to compare their efficacy. Our findings also showed that biologics could be applied as alternative or adjuvant therapy for uncontrolled severe CRSwNP. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10234113/ /pubmed/37357547 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clt2.12269 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Allergy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chen, Jiani
Wang, Huan
Zhang, Chen
Shi, Le
Zhang, Qianqian
Song, Xiaole
Wang, Dehui
Hu, Li
Yu, Hongmeng
Sun, Xicai
Comparative short‐term efficacy of endoscopic sinus surgery and biological therapies in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: A network meta‐analysis
title Comparative short‐term efficacy of endoscopic sinus surgery and biological therapies in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: A network meta‐analysis
title_full Comparative short‐term efficacy of endoscopic sinus surgery and biological therapies in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: A network meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Comparative short‐term efficacy of endoscopic sinus surgery and biological therapies in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: A network meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative short‐term efficacy of endoscopic sinus surgery and biological therapies in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: A network meta‐analysis
title_short Comparative short‐term efficacy of endoscopic sinus surgery and biological therapies in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: A network meta‐analysis
title_sort comparative short‐term efficacy of endoscopic sinus surgery and biological therapies in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a network meta‐analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10234113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37357547
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/clt2.12269
work_keys_str_mv AT chenjiani comparativeshorttermefficacyofendoscopicsinussurgeryandbiologicaltherapiesinchronicrhinosinusitiswithnasalpolypsanetworkmetaanalysis
AT wanghuan comparativeshorttermefficacyofendoscopicsinussurgeryandbiologicaltherapiesinchronicrhinosinusitiswithnasalpolypsanetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhangchen comparativeshorttermefficacyofendoscopicsinussurgeryandbiologicaltherapiesinchronicrhinosinusitiswithnasalpolypsanetworkmetaanalysis
AT shile comparativeshorttermefficacyofendoscopicsinussurgeryandbiologicaltherapiesinchronicrhinosinusitiswithnasalpolypsanetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhangqianqian comparativeshorttermefficacyofendoscopicsinussurgeryandbiologicaltherapiesinchronicrhinosinusitiswithnasalpolypsanetworkmetaanalysis
AT songxiaole comparativeshorttermefficacyofendoscopicsinussurgeryandbiologicaltherapiesinchronicrhinosinusitiswithnasalpolypsanetworkmetaanalysis
AT wangdehui comparativeshorttermefficacyofendoscopicsinussurgeryandbiologicaltherapiesinchronicrhinosinusitiswithnasalpolypsanetworkmetaanalysis
AT huli comparativeshorttermefficacyofendoscopicsinussurgeryandbiologicaltherapiesinchronicrhinosinusitiswithnasalpolypsanetworkmetaanalysis
AT yuhongmeng comparativeshorttermefficacyofendoscopicsinussurgeryandbiologicaltherapiesinchronicrhinosinusitiswithnasalpolypsanetworkmetaanalysis
AT sunxicai comparativeshorttermefficacyofendoscopicsinussurgeryandbiologicaltherapiesinchronicrhinosinusitiswithnasalpolypsanetworkmetaanalysis