Cargando…

Skin manifestations and submacroscopical features of acromegaly: A case‐control study using dermoscopy and high‐frequency ultrasound

BACKGROUND: Although the cutaneous involvement of acromegaly has been recognized, the submacroscopical skin changes and the extent of skin thickening of patients remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed at investigating the clinical cutaneous manifestations, dermoscopic features, and skin thickn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yukun, Guo, Xiaopeng, Liu, Jie, Xing, Bing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10234156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37113099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.13319
_version_ 1785052421765988352
author Wang, Yukun
Guo, Xiaopeng
Liu, Jie
Xing, Bing
author_facet Wang, Yukun
Guo, Xiaopeng
Liu, Jie
Xing, Bing
author_sort Wang, Yukun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although the cutaneous involvement of acromegaly has been recognized, the submacroscopical skin changes and the extent of skin thickening of patients remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed at investigating the clinical cutaneous manifestations, dermoscopic features, and skin thickness revealed by high‐frequency ultrasound (HFUS) of acromegalic patients. METHODS: A case‐control observational study was conducted. Patients with acromegaly and controls were prospectively included and received thorough cutaneous examinations to compare the macroscopical and dermoscopic features. The skin thickness measured by HFUS and its correlation with clinical data were also assessed. RESULTS: Thirty‐seven and 26 patients from acromegalic and control group were included, respectively. Clinical skin manifestations were recorded in detail. Under dermoscopy, red structureless area (91.9% vs. 65.4%, p = 0.021), perifollicular orange halo (78.4% vs. 26.9%, p = 0.005), and follicular plug (70.3% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.001) in the facial area, and perifollicular pigmentation (91.9% vs. 23.1%), broom‐head hairs (83.8% vs. 3.9%), honeycomb‐like pigmentation (97.3% vs. 38.46%), widened dermatoglyphics (81.1% vs. 3.9%) at the extremities (p < 0.001) were more prevalent in acromegaly. The mean skin thickness was 4.10 ± 0.48 mm for acromegaly, and 3.55 ± 0.52 mm for controls (p < 0.001) but no correlation with disease duration, adenoma size, and hormone level was found in acromegaly. CONCLUSIONS: Submacroscopical skin changes under dermoscopy and skin thickness increase assessed by HFUS can provide clinicians with subtle evidences for early detection of acromegaly and objective parameters for accurate assessment of its skin involvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10234156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102341562023-08-11 Skin manifestations and submacroscopical features of acromegaly: A case‐control study using dermoscopy and high‐frequency ultrasound Wang, Yukun Guo, Xiaopeng Liu, Jie Xing, Bing Skin Res Technol Original Articles BACKGROUND: Although the cutaneous involvement of acromegaly has been recognized, the submacroscopical skin changes and the extent of skin thickening of patients remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed at investigating the clinical cutaneous manifestations, dermoscopic features, and skin thickness revealed by high‐frequency ultrasound (HFUS) of acromegalic patients. METHODS: A case‐control observational study was conducted. Patients with acromegaly and controls were prospectively included and received thorough cutaneous examinations to compare the macroscopical and dermoscopic features. The skin thickness measured by HFUS and its correlation with clinical data were also assessed. RESULTS: Thirty‐seven and 26 patients from acromegalic and control group were included, respectively. Clinical skin manifestations were recorded in detail. Under dermoscopy, red structureless area (91.9% vs. 65.4%, p = 0.021), perifollicular orange halo (78.4% vs. 26.9%, p = 0.005), and follicular plug (70.3% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.001) in the facial area, and perifollicular pigmentation (91.9% vs. 23.1%), broom‐head hairs (83.8% vs. 3.9%), honeycomb‐like pigmentation (97.3% vs. 38.46%), widened dermatoglyphics (81.1% vs. 3.9%) at the extremities (p < 0.001) were more prevalent in acromegaly. The mean skin thickness was 4.10 ± 0.48 mm for acromegaly, and 3.55 ± 0.52 mm for controls (p < 0.001) but no correlation with disease duration, adenoma size, and hormone level was found in acromegaly. CONCLUSIONS: Submacroscopical skin changes under dermoscopy and skin thickness increase assessed by HFUS can provide clinicians with subtle evidences for early detection of acromegaly and objective parameters for accurate assessment of its skin involvement. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10234156/ /pubmed/37113099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.13319 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Skin Research and Technology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Wang, Yukun
Guo, Xiaopeng
Liu, Jie
Xing, Bing
Skin manifestations and submacroscopical features of acromegaly: A case‐control study using dermoscopy and high‐frequency ultrasound
title Skin manifestations and submacroscopical features of acromegaly: A case‐control study using dermoscopy and high‐frequency ultrasound
title_full Skin manifestations and submacroscopical features of acromegaly: A case‐control study using dermoscopy and high‐frequency ultrasound
title_fullStr Skin manifestations and submacroscopical features of acromegaly: A case‐control study using dermoscopy and high‐frequency ultrasound
title_full_unstemmed Skin manifestations and submacroscopical features of acromegaly: A case‐control study using dermoscopy and high‐frequency ultrasound
title_short Skin manifestations and submacroscopical features of acromegaly: A case‐control study using dermoscopy and high‐frequency ultrasound
title_sort skin manifestations and submacroscopical features of acromegaly: a case‐control study using dermoscopy and high‐frequency ultrasound
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10234156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37113099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.13319
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyukun skinmanifestationsandsubmacroscopicalfeaturesofacromegalyacasecontrolstudyusingdermoscopyandhighfrequencyultrasound
AT guoxiaopeng skinmanifestationsandsubmacroscopicalfeaturesofacromegalyacasecontrolstudyusingdermoscopyandhighfrequencyultrasound
AT liujie skinmanifestationsandsubmacroscopicalfeaturesofacromegalyacasecontrolstudyusingdermoscopyandhighfrequencyultrasound
AT xingbing skinmanifestationsandsubmacroscopicalfeaturesofacromegalyacasecontrolstudyusingdermoscopyandhighfrequencyultrasound