Cargando…

The impact of the COVID‐19 surge on phototherapy in Taiwan: Focusing on the patient profile, adherence, and attitude before and after the surge

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic has caused changes in the medical practice. However, it is unclear whether the patients receiving phototherapy for their dermatoses have been affected. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify the impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on phototherap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chu, Kuan‐Yu, Lan, Cheng‐Che E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10234173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37113097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.13314
_version_ 1785052427018305536
author Chu, Kuan‐Yu
Lan, Cheng‐Che E.
author_facet Chu, Kuan‐Yu
Lan, Cheng‐Che E.
author_sort Chu, Kuan‐Yu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic has caused changes in the medical practice. However, it is unclear whether the patients receiving phototherapy for their dermatoses have been affected. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify the impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on phototherapy, focusing on the patient profile, adherence, and attitude before and after the surge. METHODS: The study encompassed the time 5 months prior to and after the surge of the COVID‐19 pandemic (from May to July, 2021), resulting in the temporary closure of our phototherapeutic unit. RESULTS: Nine hundred eighty‐one patients received phototherapy during this period. Vitiligo, psoriasis (Ps), and atopic dermatitis (AD) represented the groups with the highest patient numbers. For vitiligo, Ps and AD, 39.6%, 41.9%, and 28.4% of the patients resumed phototherapy after the pandemic‐related shutdown (PRS). No significant difference was noted in age, gender, and number of weekly sessions between those who resumed or stopped phototherapy after PRS among three groups. Patients who resumed phototherapy after PRS tended to receive more weekly sessions of phototherapy than those who initiated after PRS. Additionally, patients who resumed phototherapy showed no significant difference in the number of weekly sessions before and after PRS. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals a significant impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on patients undergoing phototherapy. Although the patient number remained similar before and after PRS, a significant portion of patients discontinued phototherapy after PRS. New strategies and continued education are needed to improve patient management in times of pandemic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10234173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102341732023-08-11 The impact of the COVID‐19 surge on phototherapy in Taiwan: Focusing on the patient profile, adherence, and attitude before and after the surge Chu, Kuan‐Yu Lan, Cheng‐Che E. Skin Res Technol Original Articles BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic has caused changes in the medical practice. However, it is unclear whether the patients receiving phototherapy for their dermatoses have been affected. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify the impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on phototherapy, focusing on the patient profile, adherence, and attitude before and after the surge. METHODS: The study encompassed the time 5 months prior to and after the surge of the COVID‐19 pandemic (from May to July, 2021), resulting in the temporary closure of our phototherapeutic unit. RESULTS: Nine hundred eighty‐one patients received phototherapy during this period. Vitiligo, psoriasis (Ps), and atopic dermatitis (AD) represented the groups with the highest patient numbers. For vitiligo, Ps and AD, 39.6%, 41.9%, and 28.4% of the patients resumed phototherapy after the pandemic‐related shutdown (PRS). No significant difference was noted in age, gender, and number of weekly sessions between those who resumed or stopped phototherapy after PRS among three groups. Patients who resumed phototherapy after PRS tended to receive more weekly sessions of phototherapy than those who initiated after PRS. Additionally, patients who resumed phototherapy showed no significant difference in the number of weekly sessions before and after PRS. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals a significant impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on patients undergoing phototherapy. Although the patient number remained similar before and after PRS, a significant portion of patients discontinued phototherapy after PRS. New strategies and continued education are needed to improve patient management in times of pandemic. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10234173/ /pubmed/37113097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.13314 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Skin Research and Technology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Chu, Kuan‐Yu
Lan, Cheng‐Che E.
The impact of the COVID‐19 surge on phototherapy in Taiwan: Focusing on the patient profile, adherence, and attitude before and after the surge
title The impact of the COVID‐19 surge on phototherapy in Taiwan: Focusing on the patient profile, adherence, and attitude before and after the surge
title_full The impact of the COVID‐19 surge on phototherapy in Taiwan: Focusing on the patient profile, adherence, and attitude before and after the surge
title_fullStr The impact of the COVID‐19 surge on phototherapy in Taiwan: Focusing on the patient profile, adherence, and attitude before and after the surge
title_full_unstemmed The impact of the COVID‐19 surge on phototherapy in Taiwan: Focusing on the patient profile, adherence, and attitude before and after the surge
title_short The impact of the COVID‐19 surge on phototherapy in Taiwan: Focusing on the patient profile, adherence, and attitude before and after the surge
title_sort impact of the covid‐19 surge on phototherapy in taiwan: focusing on the patient profile, adherence, and attitude before and after the surge
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10234173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37113097
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/srt.13314
work_keys_str_mv AT chukuanyu theimpactofthecovid19surgeonphototherapyintaiwanfocusingonthepatientprofileadherenceandattitudebeforeandafterthesurge
AT lanchengchee theimpactofthecovid19surgeonphototherapyintaiwanfocusingonthepatientprofileadherenceandattitudebeforeandafterthesurge
AT chukuanyu impactofthecovid19surgeonphototherapyintaiwanfocusingonthepatientprofileadherenceandattitudebeforeandafterthesurge
AT lanchengchee impactofthecovid19surgeonphototherapyintaiwanfocusingonthepatientprofileadherenceandattitudebeforeandafterthesurge