Cargando…

Guaranteed Income and Financial Treatment (G.I.F.T.): a 12-month, randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of monthly unconditional cash transfers to treatment as usual in reducing financial toxicity in people with cancer who have low incomes

Cancer-related financial hardship (i.e., financial toxicity) has been associated with anxiety and depression, greater pain and symptom burden, treatment nonadherence, and mortality. Out-of-pocket healthcare costs and lost income are primary drivers of financial toxicity, however, income loss is a pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doherty, Meredith, Heintz, Jonathan, Leader, Amy, Wittenburg, David, Ben-Shalom, Yonatan, Jacoby, Jessica, Castro, Amy, West, Stacia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10234289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37275728
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1179320
_version_ 1785052455468269568
author Doherty, Meredith
Heintz, Jonathan
Leader, Amy
Wittenburg, David
Ben-Shalom, Yonatan
Jacoby, Jessica
Castro, Amy
West, Stacia
author_facet Doherty, Meredith
Heintz, Jonathan
Leader, Amy
Wittenburg, David
Ben-Shalom, Yonatan
Jacoby, Jessica
Castro, Amy
West, Stacia
author_sort Doherty, Meredith
collection PubMed
description Cancer-related financial hardship (i.e., financial toxicity) has been associated with anxiety and depression, greater pain and symptom burden, treatment nonadherence, and mortality. Out-of-pocket healthcare costs and lost income are primary drivers of financial toxicity, however, income loss is a pronounced risk factor for cancer patients with low incomes. There has been little progress in developing an income intervention to alleviate financial toxicity cancer patients with low incomes. Unconditional cash transfers (UCT), or guaranteed income, have produced positive health effects in experiments with general low-income populations, but have not yet been evaluated in people with cancer. The Guaranteed Income and Financial Treatment (GIFT) Trial will use a two-arm randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of a 12-month UCT intervention providing $1000/month to treatment as usual on financial toxicity, health-related quality of life and treatment adherence in people with cancer who have low-incomes. The study will recruit 250 Medicaid beneficiaries with advanced cancer from two comprehensive cancer centers in Philadelphia, obtain informed consent, and randomize patients to one of two conditions: (1) $1,000/month UCT or (2) treatment as usual. Both arms will receive information on financial toxicity and the contact information for their hospital social worker or financial advocate upon enrollment. Participants will complete online surveys at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from enrollment to collect patient-reported data on primary (i.e., financial toxicity, health-related quality of life, and treatment adherence) and secondary outcomes (i.e., anxiety, depression, food insecurity, housing stability). Social security records will be used to explore the effect on mortality at 2, 3, and 5 years post-enrollment. Linear mixed-models will be used to analyze all primary and secondary continuous outcomes over time and general estimating equations with a logit link and binary distribution for all binary outcomes over time. Differences between treatment and control groups and treatment effects will be determined using models that control for age, gender, race, baseline food security, baseline housing stability, and baseline ECOG. Findings from this study will have significant implications for the development and implementation of programs and policies that address the financial burden of cancer and other serious illnesses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10234289
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102342892023-06-02 Guaranteed Income and Financial Treatment (G.I.F.T.): a 12-month, randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of monthly unconditional cash transfers to treatment as usual in reducing financial toxicity in people with cancer who have low incomes Doherty, Meredith Heintz, Jonathan Leader, Amy Wittenburg, David Ben-Shalom, Yonatan Jacoby, Jessica Castro, Amy West, Stacia Front Psychol Psychology Cancer-related financial hardship (i.e., financial toxicity) has been associated with anxiety and depression, greater pain and symptom burden, treatment nonadherence, and mortality. Out-of-pocket healthcare costs and lost income are primary drivers of financial toxicity, however, income loss is a pronounced risk factor for cancer patients with low incomes. There has been little progress in developing an income intervention to alleviate financial toxicity cancer patients with low incomes. Unconditional cash transfers (UCT), or guaranteed income, have produced positive health effects in experiments with general low-income populations, but have not yet been evaluated in people with cancer. The Guaranteed Income and Financial Treatment (GIFT) Trial will use a two-arm randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of a 12-month UCT intervention providing $1000/month to treatment as usual on financial toxicity, health-related quality of life and treatment adherence in people with cancer who have low-incomes. The study will recruit 250 Medicaid beneficiaries with advanced cancer from two comprehensive cancer centers in Philadelphia, obtain informed consent, and randomize patients to one of two conditions: (1) $1,000/month UCT or (2) treatment as usual. Both arms will receive information on financial toxicity and the contact information for their hospital social worker or financial advocate upon enrollment. Participants will complete online surveys at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from enrollment to collect patient-reported data on primary (i.e., financial toxicity, health-related quality of life, and treatment adherence) and secondary outcomes (i.e., anxiety, depression, food insecurity, housing stability). Social security records will be used to explore the effect on mortality at 2, 3, and 5 years post-enrollment. Linear mixed-models will be used to analyze all primary and secondary continuous outcomes over time and general estimating equations with a logit link and binary distribution for all binary outcomes over time. Differences between treatment and control groups and treatment effects will be determined using models that control for age, gender, race, baseline food security, baseline housing stability, and baseline ECOG. Findings from this study will have significant implications for the development and implementation of programs and policies that address the financial burden of cancer and other serious illnesses. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10234289/ /pubmed/37275728 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1179320 Text en Copyright © 2023 Doherty, Heintz, Leader, Wittenburg, Ben-Shalom, Jacoby, Castro and West. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Doherty, Meredith
Heintz, Jonathan
Leader, Amy
Wittenburg, David
Ben-Shalom, Yonatan
Jacoby, Jessica
Castro, Amy
West, Stacia
Guaranteed Income and Financial Treatment (G.I.F.T.): a 12-month, randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of monthly unconditional cash transfers to treatment as usual in reducing financial toxicity in people with cancer who have low incomes
title Guaranteed Income and Financial Treatment (G.I.F.T.): a 12-month, randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of monthly unconditional cash transfers to treatment as usual in reducing financial toxicity in people with cancer who have low incomes
title_full Guaranteed Income and Financial Treatment (G.I.F.T.): a 12-month, randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of monthly unconditional cash transfers to treatment as usual in reducing financial toxicity in people with cancer who have low incomes
title_fullStr Guaranteed Income and Financial Treatment (G.I.F.T.): a 12-month, randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of monthly unconditional cash transfers to treatment as usual in reducing financial toxicity in people with cancer who have low incomes
title_full_unstemmed Guaranteed Income and Financial Treatment (G.I.F.T.): a 12-month, randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of monthly unconditional cash transfers to treatment as usual in reducing financial toxicity in people with cancer who have low incomes
title_short Guaranteed Income and Financial Treatment (G.I.F.T.): a 12-month, randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of monthly unconditional cash transfers to treatment as usual in reducing financial toxicity in people with cancer who have low incomes
title_sort guaranteed income and financial treatment (g.i.f.t.): a 12-month, randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of monthly unconditional cash transfers to treatment as usual in reducing financial toxicity in people with cancer who have low incomes
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10234289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37275728
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1179320
work_keys_str_mv AT dohertymeredith guaranteedincomeandfinancialtreatmentgifta12monthrandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofmonthlyunconditionalcashtransferstotreatmentasusualinreducingfinancialtoxicityinpeoplewithcancerwhohavelowincomes
AT heintzjonathan guaranteedincomeandfinancialtreatmentgifta12monthrandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofmonthlyunconditionalcashtransferstotreatmentasusualinreducingfinancialtoxicityinpeoplewithcancerwhohavelowincomes
AT leaderamy guaranteedincomeandfinancialtreatmentgifta12monthrandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofmonthlyunconditionalcashtransferstotreatmentasusualinreducingfinancialtoxicityinpeoplewithcancerwhohavelowincomes
AT wittenburgdavid guaranteedincomeandfinancialtreatmentgifta12monthrandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofmonthlyunconditionalcashtransferstotreatmentasusualinreducingfinancialtoxicityinpeoplewithcancerwhohavelowincomes
AT benshalomyonatan guaranteedincomeandfinancialtreatmentgifta12monthrandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofmonthlyunconditionalcashtransferstotreatmentasusualinreducingfinancialtoxicityinpeoplewithcancerwhohavelowincomes
AT jacobyjessica guaranteedincomeandfinancialtreatmentgifta12monthrandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofmonthlyunconditionalcashtransferstotreatmentasusualinreducingfinancialtoxicityinpeoplewithcancerwhohavelowincomes
AT castroamy guaranteedincomeandfinancialtreatmentgifta12monthrandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofmonthlyunconditionalcashtransferstotreatmentasusualinreducingfinancialtoxicityinpeoplewithcancerwhohavelowincomes
AT weststacia guaranteedincomeandfinancialtreatmentgifta12monthrandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparetheeffectivenessofmonthlyunconditionalcashtransferstotreatmentasusualinreducingfinancialtoxicityinpeoplewithcancerwhohavelowincomes