Cargando…

Validation of a genome-wide polygenic score in improving fracture risk assessment beyond the FRAX tool in the Women’s Health Initiative study

BACKGROUND: Previous study has established two polygenic scores (PGSs) related to femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) (PGS_FNBMD(ldpred)) and total body BMD (PGS_TBBMD(ldpred)) that are associated with fracture risk. However, these findings have not yet been externally validated in an independen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiao, Xiangxue, Wu, Qing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10234531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37262069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286689
_version_ 1785052510453497856
author Xiao, Xiangxue
Wu, Qing
author_facet Xiao, Xiangxue
Wu, Qing
author_sort Xiao, Xiangxue
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous study has established two polygenic scores (PGSs) related to femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) (PGS_FNBMD(ldpred)) and total body BMD (PGS_TBBMD(ldpred)) that are associated with fracture risk. However, these findings have not yet been externally validated in an independent cohort. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to validate the predictive performance of the two established PGSs and to investigate whether adding PGSs to the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) improves the predictive ability of FRAX in identifying women at high risk of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fractures (HF). METHODS: The study used the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) cohort of 9,000 postmenopausal women of European ancestry. Cox Proportional Hazard Models were used to assess the association between each PGS and MOF/HF risk. Four models were formulated to investigate the effect of adding PGSs to the FRAX risk factors: (1) Base model: FRAX risk factors; (2) Base model + PGS_FNBMD(ldpred); (3) Base model + PGS_TBBMD(ldpred); (4) Base model + metaPGS. The reclassification ability of models with PGS was further assessed using the Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI) and the Integrated discrimination improvement (IDI). RESULTS: The study found that the PGSs were not significantly associated with MOF or HF after adjusting for FRAX risk factors. The FRAX base model showed moderate discrimination of MOF and HF, with a C-index of 0.623 (95% CI, 0.609 to 0.641) and 0.702 (95% CI, 0.609 to 0.718), respectively. Adding PGSs to the base FRAX model did not improve the ability to discriminate MOF or HF. Reclassification analysis showed that compared to the model without PGS, the model with PGS_TBBMD(ldpred) (1.2%, p = 0.04) and metaPGS (1.7%, p = 0.05) improve the reclassification of HF, but not MOF. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggested that incorporating genetic information into the FRAX tool has minimal improvement in predicting HF risk for elderly Caucasian women. These results highlight the need for further research to identify other factors that may contribute to fracture risk in elderly Caucasian women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10234531
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102345312023-06-02 Validation of a genome-wide polygenic score in improving fracture risk assessment beyond the FRAX tool in the Women’s Health Initiative study Xiao, Xiangxue Wu, Qing PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Previous study has established two polygenic scores (PGSs) related to femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) (PGS_FNBMD(ldpred)) and total body BMD (PGS_TBBMD(ldpred)) that are associated with fracture risk. However, these findings have not yet been externally validated in an independent cohort. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to validate the predictive performance of the two established PGSs and to investigate whether adding PGSs to the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) improves the predictive ability of FRAX in identifying women at high risk of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fractures (HF). METHODS: The study used the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) cohort of 9,000 postmenopausal women of European ancestry. Cox Proportional Hazard Models were used to assess the association between each PGS and MOF/HF risk. Four models were formulated to investigate the effect of adding PGSs to the FRAX risk factors: (1) Base model: FRAX risk factors; (2) Base model + PGS_FNBMD(ldpred); (3) Base model + PGS_TBBMD(ldpred); (4) Base model + metaPGS. The reclassification ability of models with PGS was further assessed using the Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI) and the Integrated discrimination improvement (IDI). RESULTS: The study found that the PGSs were not significantly associated with MOF or HF after adjusting for FRAX risk factors. The FRAX base model showed moderate discrimination of MOF and HF, with a C-index of 0.623 (95% CI, 0.609 to 0.641) and 0.702 (95% CI, 0.609 to 0.718), respectively. Adding PGSs to the base FRAX model did not improve the ability to discriminate MOF or HF. Reclassification analysis showed that compared to the model without PGS, the model with PGS_TBBMD(ldpred) (1.2%, p = 0.04) and metaPGS (1.7%, p = 0.05) improve the reclassification of HF, but not MOF. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggested that incorporating genetic information into the FRAX tool has minimal improvement in predicting HF risk for elderly Caucasian women. These results highlight the need for further research to identify other factors that may contribute to fracture risk in elderly Caucasian women. Public Library of Science 2023-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10234531/ /pubmed/37262069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286689 Text en © 2023 Xiao, Wu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Xiao, Xiangxue
Wu, Qing
Validation of a genome-wide polygenic score in improving fracture risk assessment beyond the FRAX tool in the Women’s Health Initiative study
title Validation of a genome-wide polygenic score in improving fracture risk assessment beyond the FRAX tool in the Women’s Health Initiative study
title_full Validation of a genome-wide polygenic score in improving fracture risk assessment beyond the FRAX tool in the Women’s Health Initiative study
title_fullStr Validation of a genome-wide polygenic score in improving fracture risk assessment beyond the FRAX tool in the Women’s Health Initiative study
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a genome-wide polygenic score in improving fracture risk assessment beyond the FRAX tool in the Women’s Health Initiative study
title_short Validation of a genome-wide polygenic score in improving fracture risk assessment beyond the FRAX tool in the Women’s Health Initiative study
title_sort validation of a genome-wide polygenic score in improving fracture risk assessment beyond the frax tool in the women’s health initiative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10234531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37262069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286689
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaoxiangxue validationofagenomewidepolygenicscoreinimprovingfractureriskassessmentbeyondthefraxtoolinthewomenshealthinitiativestudy
AT wuqing validationofagenomewidepolygenicscoreinimprovingfractureriskassessmentbeyondthefraxtoolinthewomenshealthinitiativestudy