Cargando…

Telehealth services for global emergencies: implications for COVID-19: a scoping review based on current evidence

INTRODUCTION: The availability of low-cost computing and digital telecommunication in the 1980s made telehealth practicable. Telehealth has the capacity to improve healthcare access and outcomes for patients while reducing healthcare costs across a wide range of health conditions and situations. OBJ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kissi, Jonathan, Annobil, Caleb, Mensah, Nathan Kumasenu, Owusu-Marfo, Joseph, Osei, Ernest, Asmah, Zenobia Wooduwa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10234579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37264401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09584-4
_version_ 1785052524464570368
author Kissi, Jonathan
Annobil, Caleb
Mensah, Nathan Kumasenu
Owusu-Marfo, Joseph
Osei, Ernest
Asmah, Zenobia Wooduwa
author_facet Kissi, Jonathan
Annobil, Caleb
Mensah, Nathan Kumasenu
Owusu-Marfo, Joseph
Osei, Ernest
Asmah, Zenobia Wooduwa
author_sort Kissi, Jonathan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The availability of low-cost computing and digital telecommunication in the 1980s made telehealth practicable. Telehealth has the capacity to improve healthcare access and outcomes for patients while reducing healthcare costs across a wide range of health conditions and situations. OBJECTIVE: This study compares the adoption, advantages, and challenges of telehealth services between high-income (HICs) and low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. The key search terms were: “Telehealth”, “Telehealth in HICs”, “Telehealth in LMICs”, “Telehealth before COVID-19”, “Telehealth during COVID-19”. We searched exhaustively ProQuest, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, CINAHL, and EMBASE databases from 2012. Booleans OR/AND were combined with key search terms to increase relevant search results. The literature search and selection process followed the Sample, Phenomena of Interest, Design, Evaluation, and Research (SPIDER) question format. RESULTS: The adoption of telehealth before COVID-19 was generally low in both HICs and LMICs. The impact of COVID-19 accelerated the adoption of telehealth at the facility level but not nationwide in both high-income countries and LMICs. The rapid adoption of telehealth at the facility level in both high-income and LMICs introduced several challenges that are unique to each country and need to be addressed. CONCLUSION: The lack of national policies and regulations is making the adoption of telehealth at the national level challenging in both high and low-middle-income countries. Governments and Stakeholders of healthcare must consider telehealth as a healthcare procedure that should be deployed in clinical working procedures. Primary quantitative and qualitative studies must be conducted to address challenges encountered during the pilot implementation of telehealth services in both high-income countries and LMICs before and during pandemics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10234579
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102345792023-06-01 Telehealth services for global emergencies: implications for COVID-19: a scoping review based on current evidence Kissi, Jonathan Annobil, Caleb Mensah, Nathan Kumasenu Owusu-Marfo, Joseph Osei, Ernest Asmah, Zenobia Wooduwa BMC Health Serv Res Research INTRODUCTION: The availability of low-cost computing and digital telecommunication in the 1980s made telehealth practicable. Telehealth has the capacity to improve healthcare access and outcomes for patients while reducing healthcare costs across a wide range of health conditions and situations. OBJECTIVE: This study compares the adoption, advantages, and challenges of telehealth services between high-income (HICs) and low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. The key search terms were: “Telehealth”, “Telehealth in HICs”, “Telehealth in LMICs”, “Telehealth before COVID-19”, “Telehealth during COVID-19”. We searched exhaustively ProQuest, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, CINAHL, and EMBASE databases from 2012. Booleans OR/AND were combined with key search terms to increase relevant search results. The literature search and selection process followed the Sample, Phenomena of Interest, Design, Evaluation, and Research (SPIDER) question format. RESULTS: The adoption of telehealth before COVID-19 was generally low in both HICs and LMICs. The impact of COVID-19 accelerated the adoption of telehealth at the facility level but not nationwide in both high-income countries and LMICs. The rapid adoption of telehealth at the facility level in both high-income and LMICs introduced several challenges that are unique to each country and need to be addressed. CONCLUSION: The lack of national policies and regulations is making the adoption of telehealth at the national level challenging in both high and low-middle-income countries. Governments and Stakeholders of healthcare must consider telehealth as a healthcare procedure that should be deployed in clinical working procedures. Primary quantitative and qualitative studies must be conducted to address challenges encountered during the pilot implementation of telehealth services in both high-income countries and LMICs before and during pandemics. BioMed Central 2023-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10234579/ /pubmed/37264401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09584-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Kissi, Jonathan
Annobil, Caleb
Mensah, Nathan Kumasenu
Owusu-Marfo, Joseph
Osei, Ernest
Asmah, Zenobia Wooduwa
Telehealth services for global emergencies: implications for COVID-19: a scoping review based on current evidence
title Telehealth services for global emergencies: implications for COVID-19: a scoping review based on current evidence
title_full Telehealth services for global emergencies: implications for COVID-19: a scoping review based on current evidence
title_fullStr Telehealth services for global emergencies: implications for COVID-19: a scoping review based on current evidence
title_full_unstemmed Telehealth services for global emergencies: implications for COVID-19: a scoping review based on current evidence
title_short Telehealth services for global emergencies: implications for COVID-19: a scoping review based on current evidence
title_sort telehealth services for global emergencies: implications for covid-19: a scoping review based on current evidence
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10234579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37264401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09584-4
work_keys_str_mv AT kissijonathan telehealthservicesforglobalemergenciesimplicationsforcovid19ascopingreviewbasedoncurrentevidence
AT annobilcaleb telehealthservicesforglobalemergenciesimplicationsforcovid19ascopingreviewbasedoncurrentevidence
AT mensahnathankumasenu telehealthservicesforglobalemergenciesimplicationsforcovid19ascopingreviewbasedoncurrentevidence
AT owusumarfojoseph telehealthservicesforglobalemergenciesimplicationsforcovid19ascopingreviewbasedoncurrentevidence
AT oseiernest telehealthservicesforglobalemergenciesimplicationsforcovid19ascopingreviewbasedoncurrentevidence
AT asmahzenobiawooduwa telehealthservicesforglobalemergenciesimplicationsforcovid19ascopingreviewbasedoncurrentevidence