Cargando…

Unit cost repositories for health program planning and evaluation: a report on research in practice with lessons learned

BACKGROUND: Most low- and middle-income countries have limited access to cost data that meets the needs of health policy-makers and researchers in health intervention areas including HIV, tuberculosis, and immunization. Unit cost repositories (UCRs)—searchable databases that systematically codify ev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bollinger, Lori A., Corlis, Joseph, Ombam, Regina, Forsythe, Steven, Resch, Stephen C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10234678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37264335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15964-6
_version_ 1785052551514685440
author Bollinger, Lori A.
Corlis, Joseph
Ombam, Regina
Forsythe, Steven
Resch, Stephen C.
author_facet Bollinger, Lori A.
Corlis, Joseph
Ombam, Regina
Forsythe, Steven
Resch, Stephen C.
author_sort Bollinger, Lori A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most low- and middle-income countries have limited access to cost data that meets the needs of health policy-makers and researchers in health intervention areas including HIV, tuberculosis, and immunization. Unit cost repositories (UCRs)—searchable databases that systematically codify evidence from costing studies—have been developed to reduce the effort required to access and use existing costing information. These repositories serve as public resources and standard references, which can improve the consistency and quality of resource needs projections used for strategic planning and resource mobilization. UCRs also enable analysis of cost determinants and more informed imputation of missing cost data. This report examines our experiences developing and using seven UCRs (two global, five country-level) for cost projection and research purposes. DISCUSSION: We identify advances, challenges, enablers, and lessons learned that might inform future work related to UCRs. Our lessons learned include: (1) UCRs do not replace the need for costing expertise; (2) tradeoffs are required between the degree of data complexity and the useability of the UCR; (3) streamlining data extraction makes populating the UCR with new data easier; (4) immediate reporting and planning needs often drive stakeholder interest in cost data; (5) developing and maintaining UCRs requires dedicated staff time; (6) matching decision-maker needs with appropriate cost data can be challenging; (7) UCRs must have data quality control systems; (8) data in UCRs can become obsolete; and (9) there is often a time lag between the identification of a cost and its inclusion in UCRs. CONCLUSIONS: UCRs have the potential to be a valuable public good if kept up-to-date with active quality control and adequate support available to end-users. Global UCR collaboration networks and greater control by local stakeholders over global UCRs may increase active, sustained use of global repositories and yield higher quality results for strategic planning and resource mobilization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10234678
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102346782023-06-03 Unit cost repositories for health program planning and evaluation: a report on research in practice with lessons learned Bollinger, Lori A. Corlis, Joseph Ombam, Regina Forsythe, Steven Resch, Stephen C. BMC Public Health Research in Practice BACKGROUND: Most low- and middle-income countries have limited access to cost data that meets the needs of health policy-makers and researchers in health intervention areas including HIV, tuberculosis, and immunization. Unit cost repositories (UCRs)—searchable databases that systematically codify evidence from costing studies—have been developed to reduce the effort required to access and use existing costing information. These repositories serve as public resources and standard references, which can improve the consistency and quality of resource needs projections used for strategic planning and resource mobilization. UCRs also enable analysis of cost determinants and more informed imputation of missing cost data. This report examines our experiences developing and using seven UCRs (two global, five country-level) for cost projection and research purposes. DISCUSSION: We identify advances, challenges, enablers, and lessons learned that might inform future work related to UCRs. Our lessons learned include: (1) UCRs do not replace the need for costing expertise; (2) tradeoffs are required between the degree of data complexity and the useability of the UCR; (3) streamlining data extraction makes populating the UCR with new data easier; (4) immediate reporting and planning needs often drive stakeholder interest in cost data; (5) developing and maintaining UCRs requires dedicated staff time; (6) matching decision-maker needs with appropriate cost data can be challenging; (7) UCRs must have data quality control systems; (8) data in UCRs can become obsolete; and (9) there is often a time lag between the identification of a cost and its inclusion in UCRs. CONCLUSIONS: UCRs have the potential to be a valuable public good if kept up-to-date with active quality control and adequate support available to end-users. Global UCR collaboration networks and greater control by local stakeholders over global UCRs may increase active, sustained use of global repositories and yield higher quality results for strategic planning and resource mobilization. BioMed Central 2023-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10234678/ /pubmed/37264335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15964-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research in Practice
Bollinger, Lori A.
Corlis, Joseph
Ombam, Regina
Forsythe, Steven
Resch, Stephen C.
Unit cost repositories for health program planning and evaluation: a report on research in practice with lessons learned
title Unit cost repositories for health program planning and evaluation: a report on research in practice with lessons learned
title_full Unit cost repositories for health program planning and evaluation: a report on research in practice with lessons learned
title_fullStr Unit cost repositories for health program planning and evaluation: a report on research in practice with lessons learned
title_full_unstemmed Unit cost repositories for health program planning and evaluation: a report on research in practice with lessons learned
title_short Unit cost repositories for health program planning and evaluation: a report on research in practice with lessons learned
title_sort unit cost repositories for health program planning and evaluation: a report on research in practice with lessons learned
topic Research in Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10234678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37264335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15964-6
work_keys_str_mv AT bollingerloria unitcostrepositoriesforhealthprogramplanningandevaluationareportonresearchinpracticewithlessonslearned
AT corlisjoseph unitcostrepositoriesforhealthprogramplanningandevaluationareportonresearchinpracticewithlessonslearned
AT ombamregina unitcostrepositoriesforhealthprogramplanningandevaluationareportonresearchinpracticewithlessonslearned
AT forsythesteven unitcostrepositoriesforhealthprogramplanningandevaluationareportonresearchinpracticewithlessonslearned
AT reschstephenc unitcostrepositoriesforhealthprogramplanningandevaluationareportonresearchinpracticewithlessonslearned