Cargando…
The Performance of Opioid-Free Anesthesia for Bariatric Surgery in Clinical Practice
PURPOSE: Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) is an alternative to conventional opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Several small studies and a meta-analysis have suggested advantages of OFA for bariatric surgery, but current evidence is still contradictory, and a univers...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10234923/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37106268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06584-5 |
_version_ | 1785052606708580352 |
---|---|
author | Ulbing, Stefan Infanger, Lukas Fleischmann, Edith Prager, Gerhard Hamp, Thomas |
author_facet | Ulbing, Stefan Infanger, Lukas Fleischmann, Edith Prager, Gerhard Hamp, Thomas |
author_sort | Ulbing, Stefan |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) is an alternative to conventional opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Several small studies and a meta-analysis have suggested advantages of OFA for bariatric surgery, but current evidence is still contradictory, and a universally accepted concept has not yet been established. The purpose of this study was to determine whether patients undergoing bariatric surgery experience less postoperative pain and better postoperative recovery when anesthetized with an OFA regimen than with an OBA regimen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective observational cohort study, conducted between October 2020 and July 2021, compared patients receiving OFA with patients receiving OBA. Patients were visited 24 and 48 h after the surgical procedure and asked about their postoperative pain using the visual analogue scale (VAS). Additionally, the quality of recovery-40 questionnaire (QoR-40) and the postoperative opioid requirements were recorded. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients were included and analyzed in this study (OFA: N = 50; OBA: N = 49). The OFA cohort exhibited less postoperative pain than the OBA cohort within 24 h (VAS median [interquartile range (IQR)]: 2.2 [1–4.4] vs. 4.1 [2–6.5]; P ≤ 0.001) and 48 h (VAS median [IQR]: 1.9 [0.4–4.1] vs. 3.1 [1.4–5.8]; P ≤ 0.001) postoperatively. Additionally, the OFA cohort had higher QoR-40 scores and required less opioid therapy postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Based on our results the use of OFA for bariatric surgery results in less pain, reduced opioid requirements, and improved postoperative recovery—adding additional evidence regarding the use of OFA in everyday clinical practice. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11695-023-06584-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10234923 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102349232023-06-03 The Performance of Opioid-Free Anesthesia for Bariatric Surgery in Clinical Practice Ulbing, Stefan Infanger, Lukas Fleischmann, Edith Prager, Gerhard Hamp, Thomas Obes Surg Original Contributions PURPOSE: Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) is an alternative to conventional opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Several small studies and a meta-analysis have suggested advantages of OFA for bariatric surgery, but current evidence is still contradictory, and a universally accepted concept has not yet been established. The purpose of this study was to determine whether patients undergoing bariatric surgery experience less postoperative pain and better postoperative recovery when anesthetized with an OFA regimen than with an OBA regimen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective observational cohort study, conducted between October 2020 and July 2021, compared patients receiving OFA with patients receiving OBA. Patients were visited 24 and 48 h after the surgical procedure and asked about their postoperative pain using the visual analogue scale (VAS). Additionally, the quality of recovery-40 questionnaire (QoR-40) and the postoperative opioid requirements were recorded. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients were included and analyzed in this study (OFA: N = 50; OBA: N = 49). The OFA cohort exhibited less postoperative pain than the OBA cohort within 24 h (VAS median [interquartile range (IQR)]: 2.2 [1–4.4] vs. 4.1 [2–6.5]; P ≤ 0.001) and 48 h (VAS median [IQR]: 1.9 [0.4–4.1] vs. 3.1 [1.4–5.8]; P ≤ 0.001) postoperatively. Additionally, the OFA cohort had higher QoR-40 scores and required less opioid therapy postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Based on our results the use of OFA for bariatric surgery results in less pain, reduced opioid requirements, and improved postoperative recovery—adding additional evidence regarding the use of OFA in everyday clinical practice. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11695-023-06584-5. Springer US 2023-04-27 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10234923/ /pubmed/37106268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06584-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Contributions Ulbing, Stefan Infanger, Lukas Fleischmann, Edith Prager, Gerhard Hamp, Thomas The Performance of Opioid-Free Anesthesia for Bariatric Surgery in Clinical Practice |
title | The Performance of Opioid-Free Anesthesia for Bariatric Surgery in Clinical Practice |
title_full | The Performance of Opioid-Free Anesthesia for Bariatric Surgery in Clinical Practice |
title_fullStr | The Performance of Opioid-Free Anesthesia for Bariatric Surgery in Clinical Practice |
title_full_unstemmed | The Performance of Opioid-Free Anesthesia for Bariatric Surgery in Clinical Practice |
title_short | The Performance of Opioid-Free Anesthesia for Bariatric Surgery in Clinical Practice |
title_sort | performance of opioid-free anesthesia for bariatric surgery in clinical practice |
topic | Original Contributions |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10234923/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37106268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06584-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ulbingstefan theperformanceofopioidfreeanesthesiaforbariatricsurgeryinclinicalpractice AT infangerlukas theperformanceofopioidfreeanesthesiaforbariatricsurgeryinclinicalpractice AT fleischmannedith theperformanceofopioidfreeanesthesiaforbariatricsurgeryinclinicalpractice AT pragergerhard theperformanceofopioidfreeanesthesiaforbariatricsurgeryinclinicalpractice AT hampthomas theperformanceofopioidfreeanesthesiaforbariatricsurgeryinclinicalpractice AT ulbingstefan performanceofopioidfreeanesthesiaforbariatricsurgeryinclinicalpractice AT infangerlukas performanceofopioidfreeanesthesiaforbariatricsurgeryinclinicalpractice AT fleischmannedith performanceofopioidfreeanesthesiaforbariatricsurgeryinclinicalpractice AT pragergerhard performanceofopioidfreeanesthesiaforbariatricsurgeryinclinicalpractice AT hampthomas performanceofopioidfreeanesthesiaforbariatricsurgeryinclinicalpractice |