Cargando…

The Performance of Opioid-Free Anesthesia for Bariatric Surgery in Clinical Practice

PURPOSE: Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) is an alternative to conventional opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Several small studies and a meta-analysis have suggested advantages of OFA for bariatric surgery, but current evidence is still contradictory, and a univers...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ulbing, Stefan, Infanger, Lukas, Fleischmann, Edith, Prager, Gerhard, Hamp, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10234923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37106268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06584-5
_version_ 1785052606708580352
author Ulbing, Stefan
Infanger, Lukas
Fleischmann, Edith
Prager, Gerhard
Hamp, Thomas
author_facet Ulbing, Stefan
Infanger, Lukas
Fleischmann, Edith
Prager, Gerhard
Hamp, Thomas
author_sort Ulbing, Stefan
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) is an alternative to conventional opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Several small studies and a meta-analysis have suggested advantages of OFA for bariatric surgery, but current evidence is still contradictory, and a universally accepted concept has not yet been established. The purpose of this study was to determine whether patients undergoing bariatric surgery experience less postoperative pain and better postoperative recovery when anesthetized with an OFA regimen than with an OBA regimen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective observational cohort study, conducted between October 2020 and July 2021, compared patients receiving OFA with patients receiving OBA. Patients were visited 24 and 48 h after the surgical procedure and asked about their postoperative pain using the visual analogue scale (VAS). Additionally, the quality of recovery-40 questionnaire (QoR-40) and the postoperative opioid requirements were recorded. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients were included and analyzed in this study (OFA: N = 50; OBA: N = 49). The OFA cohort exhibited less postoperative pain than the OBA cohort within 24 h (VAS median [interquartile range (IQR)]: 2.2 [1–4.4] vs. 4.1 [2–6.5]; P ≤ 0.001) and 48 h (VAS median [IQR]: 1.9 [0.4–4.1] vs. 3.1 [1.4–5.8]; P ≤ 0.001) postoperatively. Additionally, the OFA cohort had higher QoR-40 scores and required less opioid therapy postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Based on our results the use of OFA for bariatric surgery results in less pain, reduced opioid requirements, and improved postoperative recovery—adding additional evidence regarding the use of OFA in everyday clinical practice. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11695-023-06584-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10234923
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102349232023-06-03 The Performance of Opioid-Free Anesthesia for Bariatric Surgery in Clinical Practice Ulbing, Stefan Infanger, Lukas Fleischmann, Edith Prager, Gerhard Hamp, Thomas Obes Surg Original Contributions PURPOSE: Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) is an alternative to conventional opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Several small studies and a meta-analysis have suggested advantages of OFA for bariatric surgery, but current evidence is still contradictory, and a universally accepted concept has not yet been established. The purpose of this study was to determine whether patients undergoing bariatric surgery experience less postoperative pain and better postoperative recovery when anesthetized with an OFA regimen than with an OBA regimen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective observational cohort study, conducted between October 2020 and July 2021, compared patients receiving OFA with patients receiving OBA. Patients were visited 24 and 48 h after the surgical procedure and asked about their postoperative pain using the visual analogue scale (VAS). Additionally, the quality of recovery-40 questionnaire (QoR-40) and the postoperative opioid requirements were recorded. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients were included and analyzed in this study (OFA: N = 50; OBA: N = 49). The OFA cohort exhibited less postoperative pain than the OBA cohort within 24 h (VAS median [interquartile range (IQR)]: 2.2 [1–4.4] vs. 4.1 [2–6.5]; P ≤ 0.001) and 48 h (VAS median [IQR]: 1.9 [0.4–4.1] vs. 3.1 [1.4–5.8]; P ≤ 0.001) postoperatively. Additionally, the OFA cohort had higher QoR-40 scores and required less opioid therapy postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Based on our results the use of OFA for bariatric surgery results in less pain, reduced opioid requirements, and improved postoperative recovery—adding additional evidence regarding the use of OFA in everyday clinical practice. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11695-023-06584-5. Springer US 2023-04-27 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10234923/ /pubmed/37106268 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06584-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Contributions
Ulbing, Stefan
Infanger, Lukas
Fleischmann, Edith
Prager, Gerhard
Hamp, Thomas
The Performance of Opioid-Free Anesthesia for Bariatric Surgery in Clinical Practice
title The Performance of Opioid-Free Anesthesia for Bariatric Surgery in Clinical Practice
title_full The Performance of Opioid-Free Anesthesia for Bariatric Surgery in Clinical Practice
title_fullStr The Performance of Opioid-Free Anesthesia for Bariatric Surgery in Clinical Practice
title_full_unstemmed The Performance of Opioid-Free Anesthesia for Bariatric Surgery in Clinical Practice
title_short The Performance of Opioid-Free Anesthesia for Bariatric Surgery in Clinical Practice
title_sort performance of opioid-free anesthesia for bariatric surgery in clinical practice
topic Original Contributions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10234923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37106268
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06584-5
work_keys_str_mv AT ulbingstefan theperformanceofopioidfreeanesthesiaforbariatricsurgeryinclinicalpractice
AT infangerlukas theperformanceofopioidfreeanesthesiaforbariatricsurgeryinclinicalpractice
AT fleischmannedith theperformanceofopioidfreeanesthesiaforbariatricsurgeryinclinicalpractice
AT pragergerhard theperformanceofopioidfreeanesthesiaforbariatricsurgeryinclinicalpractice
AT hampthomas theperformanceofopioidfreeanesthesiaforbariatricsurgeryinclinicalpractice
AT ulbingstefan performanceofopioidfreeanesthesiaforbariatricsurgeryinclinicalpractice
AT infangerlukas performanceofopioidfreeanesthesiaforbariatricsurgeryinclinicalpractice
AT fleischmannedith performanceofopioidfreeanesthesiaforbariatricsurgeryinclinicalpractice
AT pragergerhard performanceofopioidfreeanesthesiaforbariatricsurgeryinclinicalpractice
AT hampthomas performanceofopioidfreeanesthesiaforbariatricsurgeryinclinicalpractice