Cargando…
The physiology of intraoperative error: using electrokardiograms to understand operator performance during robot-assisted surgery simulations
BACKGROUND: No platform for objective, synchronous and on-line evaluation of both intraoperative error and surgeon physiology yet exists. Electrokardiogram (EKG) metrics have been associated with cognitive and affective features that are known to impact surgical performance but have not yet been ana...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10234932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36862171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-09957-0 |
_version_ | 1785052607933317120 |
---|---|
author | D’Ambrosia, Christopher Aronoff-Spencer, Eliah Huang, Estella Y. Goldhaber, Nicole H. Jacobsen, Garth R. Sandler, Bryan Horgan, Santiago Appelbaum, Lawrence G. Christensen, Henrik Broderick, Ryan C. |
author_facet | D’Ambrosia, Christopher Aronoff-Spencer, Eliah Huang, Estella Y. Goldhaber, Nicole H. Jacobsen, Garth R. Sandler, Bryan Horgan, Santiago Appelbaum, Lawrence G. Christensen, Henrik Broderick, Ryan C. |
author_sort | D’Ambrosia, Christopher |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: No platform for objective, synchronous and on-line evaluation of both intraoperative error and surgeon physiology yet exists. Electrokardiogram (EKG) metrics have been associated with cognitive and affective features that are known to impact surgical performance but have not yet been analyzed in conjunction with real-time error signals using objective, real-time methods. METHODS: EKGs and operating console point-of-views (POVs) for fifteen general surgery residents and five non-medically trained participants were captured during three simulated robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) procedures. Time and frequency-domain EKG statistics were extracted from recorded EKGs. Intraoperative errors were detected from operating console POV videos. EKG statistics were synchronized with intraoperative error signals. RESULTS: Relative to personalized baselines, IBI, SDNN and RMSSD decreased 0.15% (S.E. 3.603e−04; P = 3.25e−05), 3.08% (S.E. 1.603e−03; P < 2e−16) and 1.19% (S.E. 2.631e−03; P = 5.66e−06), respectively, during error. Relative LF RMS power decreased 1.44% (S.E. 2.337e−03; P = 8.38e−10), and relative HF RMS power increased 5.51% (S.E. 1.945e−03; P < 2e−16). CONCLUSIONS: Use of a novel, on-line biometric and operating room data capture and analysis platform enabled detection of distinct operator physiological changes during intraoperative errors. Monitoring operator EKG metrics during surgery may help improve patient outcomes through real-time assessments of intraoperative surgical proficiency and perceived difficulty as well as inform personalized surgical skills development. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-023-09957-0. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10234932 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102349322023-06-03 The physiology of intraoperative error: using electrokardiograms to understand operator performance during robot-assisted surgery simulations D’Ambrosia, Christopher Aronoff-Spencer, Eliah Huang, Estella Y. Goldhaber, Nicole H. Jacobsen, Garth R. Sandler, Bryan Horgan, Santiago Appelbaum, Lawrence G. Christensen, Henrik Broderick, Ryan C. Surg Endosc Original Article BACKGROUND: No platform for objective, synchronous and on-line evaluation of both intraoperative error and surgeon physiology yet exists. Electrokardiogram (EKG) metrics have been associated with cognitive and affective features that are known to impact surgical performance but have not yet been analyzed in conjunction with real-time error signals using objective, real-time methods. METHODS: EKGs and operating console point-of-views (POVs) for fifteen general surgery residents and five non-medically trained participants were captured during three simulated robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) procedures. Time and frequency-domain EKG statistics were extracted from recorded EKGs. Intraoperative errors were detected from operating console POV videos. EKG statistics were synchronized with intraoperative error signals. RESULTS: Relative to personalized baselines, IBI, SDNN and RMSSD decreased 0.15% (S.E. 3.603e−04; P = 3.25e−05), 3.08% (S.E. 1.603e−03; P < 2e−16) and 1.19% (S.E. 2.631e−03; P = 5.66e−06), respectively, during error. Relative LF RMS power decreased 1.44% (S.E. 2.337e−03; P = 8.38e−10), and relative HF RMS power increased 5.51% (S.E. 1.945e−03; P < 2e−16). CONCLUSIONS: Use of a novel, on-line biometric and operating room data capture and analysis platform enabled detection of distinct operator physiological changes during intraoperative errors. Monitoring operator EKG metrics during surgery may help improve patient outcomes through real-time assessments of intraoperative surgical proficiency and perceived difficulty as well as inform personalized surgical skills development. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-023-09957-0. Springer US 2023-03-02 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10234932/ /pubmed/36862171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-09957-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article D’Ambrosia, Christopher Aronoff-Spencer, Eliah Huang, Estella Y. Goldhaber, Nicole H. Jacobsen, Garth R. Sandler, Bryan Horgan, Santiago Appelbaum, Lawrence G. Christensen, Henrik Broderick, Ryan C. The physiology of intraoperative error: using electrokardiograms to understand operator performance during robot-assisted surgery simulations |
title | The physiology of intraoperative error: using electrokardiograms to understand operator performance during robot-assisted surgery simulations |
title_full | The physiology of intraoperative error: using electrokardiograms to understand operator performance during robot-assisted surgery simulations |
title_fullStr | The physiology of intraoperative error: using electrokardiograms to understand operator performance during robot-assisted surgery simulations |
title_full_unstemmed | The physiology of intraoperative error: using electrokardiograms to understand operator performance during robot-assisted surgery simulations |
title_short | The physiology of intraoperative error: using electrokardiograms to understand operator performance during robot-assisted surgery simulations |
title_sort | physiology of intraoperative error: using electrokardiograms to understand operator performance during robot-assisted surgery simulations |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10234932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36862171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-09957-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dambrosiachristopher thephysiologyofintraoperativeerrorusingelectrokardiogramstounderstandoperatorperformanceduringrobotassistedsurgerysimulations AT aronoffspencereliah thephysiologyofintraoperativeerrorusingelectrokardiogramstounderstandoperatorperformanceduringrobotassistedsurgerysimulations AT huangestellay thephysiologyofintraoperativeerrorusingelectrokardiogramstounderstandoperatorperformanceduringrobotassistedsurgerysimulations AT goldhabernicoleh thephysiologyofintraoperativeerrorusingelectrokardiogramstounderstandoperatorperformanceduringrobotassistedsurgerysimulations AT jacobsengarthr thephysiologyofintraoperativeerrorusingelectrokardiogramstounderstandoperatorperformanceduringrobotassistedsurgerysimulations AT sandlerbryan thephysiologyofintraoperativeerrorusingelectrokardiogramstounderstandoperatorperformanceduringrobotassistedsurgerysimulations AT horgansantiago thephysiologyofintraoperativeerrorusingelectrokardiogramstounderstandoperatorperformanceduringrobotassistedsurgerysimulations AT appelbaumlawrenceg thephysiologyofintraoperativeerrorusingelectrokardiogramstounderstandoperatorperformanceduringrobotassistedsurgerysimulations AT christensenhenrik thephysiologyofintraoperativeerrorusingelectrokardiogramstounderstandoperatorperformanceduringrobotassistedsurgerysimulations AT broderickryanc thephysiologyofintraoperativeerrorusingelectrokardiogramstounderstandoperatorperformanceduringrobotassistedsurgerysimulations AT dambrosiachristopher physiologyofintraoperativeerrorusingelectrokardiogramstounderstandoperatorperformanceduringrobotassistedsurgerysimulations AT aronoffspencereliah physiologyofintraoperativeerrorusingelectrokardiogramstounderstandoperatorperformanceduringrobotassistedsurgerysimulations AT huangestellay physiologyofintraoperativeerrorusingelectrokardiogramstounderstandoperatorperformanceduringrobotassistedsurgerysimulations AT goldhabernicoleh physiologyofintraoperativeerrorusingelectrokardiogramstounderstandoperatorperformanceduringrobotassistedsurgerysimulations AT jacobsengarthr physiologyofintraoperativeerrorusingelectrokardiogramstounderstandoperatorperformanceduringrobotassistedsurgerysimulations AT sandlerbryan physiologyofintraoperativeerrorusingelectrokardiogramstounderstandoperatorperformanceduringrobotassistedsurgerysimulations AT horgansantiago physiologyofintraoperativeerrorusingelectrokardiogramstounderstandoperatorperformanceduringrobotassistedsurgerysimulations AT appelbaumlawrenceg physiologyofintraoperativeerrorusingelectrokardiogramstounderstandoperatorperformanceduringrobotassistedsurgerysimulations AT christensenhenrik physiologyofintraoperativeerrorusingelectrokardiogramstounderstandoperatorperformanceduringrobotassistedsurgerysimulations AT broderickryanc physiologyofintraoperativeerrorusingelectrokardiogramstounderstandoperatorperformanceduringrobotassistedsurgerysimulations |