Cargando…

The physiology of intraoperative error: using electrokardiograms to understand operator performance during robot-assisted surgery simulations

BACKGROUND: No platform for objective, synchronous and on-line evaluation of both intraoperative error and surgeon physiology yet exists. Electrokardiogram (EKG) metrics have been associated with cognitive and affective features that are known to impact surgical performance but have not yet been ana...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: D’Ambrosia, Christopher, Aronoff-Spencer, Eliah, Huang, Estella Y., Goldhaber, Nicole H., Jacobsen, Garth R., Sandler, Bryan, Horgan, Santiago, Appelbaum, Lawrence G., Christensen, Henrik, Broderick, Ryan C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10234932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36862171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-09957-0
_version_ 1785052607933317120
author D’Ambrosia, Christopher
Aronoff-Spencer, Eliah
Huang, Estella Y.
Goldhaber, Nicole H.
Jacobsen, Garth R.
Sandler, Bryan
Horgan, Santiago
Appelbaum, Lawrence G.
Christensen, Henrik
Broderick, Ryan C.
author_facet D’Ambrosia, Christopher
Aronoff-Spencer, Eliah
Huang, Estella Y.
Goldhaber, Nicole H.
Jacobsen, Garth R.
Sandler, Bryan
Horgan, Santiago
Appelbaum, Lawrence G.
Christensen, Henrik
Broderick, Ryan C.
author_sort D’Ambrosia, Christopher
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: No platform for objective, synchronous and on-line evaluation of both intraoperative error and surgeon physiology yet exists. Electrokardiogram (EKG) metrics have been associated with cognitive and affective features that are known to impact surgical performance but have not yet been analyzed in conjunction with real-time error signals using objective, real-time methods. METHODS: EKGs and operating console point-of-views (POVs) for fifteen general surgery residents and five non-medically trained participants were captured during three simulated robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) procedures. Time and frequency-domain EKG statistics were extracted from recorded EKGs. Intraoperative errors were detected from operating console POV videos. EKG statistics were synchronized with intraoperative error signals. RESULTS: Relative to personalized baselines, IBI, SDNN and RMSSD decreased 0.15% (S.E. 3.603e−04; P = 3.25e−05), 3.08% (S.E. 1.603e−03; P < 2e−16) and 1.19% (S.E. 2.631e−03; P = 5.66e−06), respectively, during error. Relative LF RMS power decreased 1.44% (S.E. 2.337e−03; P = 8.38e−10), and relative HF RMS power increased 5.51% (S.E. 1.945e−03; P < 2e−16). CONCLUSIONS: Use of a novel, on-line biometric and operating room data capture and analysis platform enabled detection of distinct operator physiological changes during intraoperative errors. Monitoring operator EKG metrics during surgery may help improve patient outcomes through real-time assessments of intraoperative surgical proficiency and perceived difficulty as well as inform personalized surgical skills development. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-023-09957-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10234932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102349322023-06-03 The physiology of intraoperative error: using electrokardiograms to understand operator performance during robot-assisted surgery simulations D’Ambrosia, Christopher Aronoff-Spencer, Eliah Huang, Estella Y. Goldhaber, Nicole H. Jacobsen, Garth R. Sandler, Bryan Horgan, Santiago Appelbaum, Lawrence G. Christensen, Henrik Broderick, Ryan C. Surg Endosc Original Article BACKGROUND: No platform for objective, synchronous and on-line evaluation of both intraoperative error and surgeon physiology yet exists. Electrokardiogram (EKG) metrics have been associated with cognitive and affective features that are known to impact surgical performance but have not yet been analyzed in conjunction with real-time error signals using objective, real-time methods. METHODS: EKGs and operating console point-of-views (POVs) for fifteen general surgery residents and five non-medically trained participants were captured during three simulated robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) procedures. Time and frequency-domain EKG statistics were extracted from recorded EKGs. Intraoperative errors were detected from operating console POV videos. EKG statistics were synchronized with intraoperative error signals. RESULTS: Relative to personalized baselines, IBI, SDNN and RMSSD decreased 0.15% (S.E. 3.603e−04; P = 3.25e−05), 3.08% (S.E. 1.603e−03; P < 2e−16) and 1.19% (S.E. 2.631e−03; P = 5.66e−06), respectively, during error. Relative LF RMS power decreased 1.44% (S.E. 2.337e−03; P = 8.38e−10), and relative HF RMS power increased 5.51% (S.E. 1.945e−03; P < 2e−16). CONCLUSIONS: Use of a novel, on-line biometric and operating room data capture and analysis platform enabled detection of distinct operator physiological changes during intraoperative errors. Monitoring operator EKG metrics during surgery may help improve patient outcomes through real-time assessments of intraoperative surgical proficiency and perceived difficulty as well as inform personalized surgical skills development. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-023-09957-0. Springer US 2023-03-02 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10234932/ /pubmed/36862171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-09957-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
D’Ambrosia, Christopher
Aronoff-Spencer, Eliah
Huang, Estella Y.
Goldhaber, Nicole H.
Jacobsen, Garth R.
Sandler, Bryan
Horgan, Santiago
Appelbaum, Lawrence G.
Christensen, Henrik
Broderick, Ryan C.
The physiology of intraoperative error: using electrokardiograms to understand operator performance during robot-assisted surgery simulations
title The physiology of intraoperative error: using electrokardiograms to understand operator performance during robot-assisted surgery simulations
title_full The physiology of intraoperative error: using electrokardiograms to understand operator performance during robot-assisted surgery simulations
title_fullStr The physiology of intraoperative error: using electrokardiograms to understand operator performance during robot-assisted surgery simulations
title_full_unstemmed The physiology of intraoperative error: using electrokardiograms to understand operator performance during robot-assisted surgery simulations
title_short The physiology of intraoperative error: using electrokardiograms to understand operator performance during robot-assisted surgery simulations
title_sort physiology of intraoperative error: using electrokardiograms to understand operator performance during robot-assisted surgery simulations
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10234932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36862171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-09957-0
work_keys_str_mv AT dambrosiachristopher thephysiologyofintraoperativeerrorusingelectrokardiogramstounderstandoperatorperformanceduringrobotassistedsurgerysimulations
AT aronoffspencereliah thephysiologyofintraoperativeerrorusingelectrokardiogramstounderstandoperatorperformanceduringrobotassistedsurgerysimulations
AT huangestellay thephysiologyofintraoperativeerrorusingelectrokardiogramstounderstandoperatorperformanceduringrobotassistedsurgerysimulations
AT goldhabernicoleh thephysiologyofintraoperativeerrorusingelectrokardiogramstounderstandoperatorperformanceduringrobotassistedsurgerysimulations
AT jacobsengarthr thephysiologyofintraoperativeerrorusingelectrokardiogramstounderstandoperatorperformanceduringrobotassistedsurgerysimulations
AT sandlerbryan thephysiologyofintraoperativeerrorusingelectrokardiogramstounderstandoperatorperformanceduringrobotassistedsurgerysimulations
AT horgansantiago thephysiologyofintraoperativeerrorusingelectrokardiogramstounderstandoperatorperformanceduringrobotassistedsurgerysimulations
AT appelbaumlawrenceg thephysiologyofintraoperativeerrorusingelectrokardiogramstounderstandoperatorperformanceduringrobotassistedsurgerysimulations
AT christensenhenrik thephysiologyofintraoperativeerrorusingelectrokardiogramstounderstandoperatorperformanceduringrobotassistedsurgerysimulations
AT broderickryanc thephysiologyofintraoperativeerrorusingelectrokardiogramstounderstandoperatorperformanceduringrobotassistedsurgerysimulations
AT dambrosiachristopher physiologyofintraoperativeerrorusingelectrokardiogramstounderstandoperatorperformanceduringrobotassistedsurgerysimulations
AT aronoffspencereliah physiologyofintraoperativeerrorusingelectrokardiogramstounderstandoperatorperformanceduringrobotassistedsurgerysimulations
AT huangestellay physiologyofintraoperativeerrorusingelectrokardiogramstounderstandoperatorperformanceduringrobotassistedsurgerysimulations
AT goldhabernicoleh physiologyofintraoperativeerrorusingelectrokardiogramstounderstandoperatorperformanceduringrobotassistedsurgerysimulations
AT jacobsengarthr physiologyofintraoperativeerrorusingelectrokardiogramstounderstandoperatorperformanceduringrobotassistedsurgerysimulations
AT sandlerbryan physiologyofintraoperativeerrorusingelectrokardiogramstounderstandoperatorperformanceduringrobotassistedsurgerysimulations
AT horgansantiago physiologyofintraoperativeerrorusingelectrokardiogramstounderstandoperatorperformanceduringrobotassistedsurgerysimulations
AT appelbaumlawrenceg physiologyofintraoperativeerrorusingelectrokardiogramstounderstandoperatorperformanceduringrobotassistedsurgerysimulations
AT christensenhenrik physiologyofintraoperativeerrorusingelectrokardiogramstounderstandoperatorperformanceduringrobotassistedsurgerysimulations
AT broderickryanc physiologyofintraoperativeerrorusingelectrokardiogramstounderstandoperatorperformanceduringrobotassistedsurgerysimulations