Cargando…
Prospective comparison of [(18)F]AlF-NOTA-octreotide PET/MRI to [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in neuroendocrine tumor patients
BACKGROUND: Fluorine-18-labeled SSAs have the potential to become the next-generation tracer in SSTR-imaging in neuroendocrine tumor (NET) patients given their logistical advantages over the current gold standard gallium-68-labeled SSAs. In particular, [(18)F]AlF-OC has already shown excellent clini...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10235004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37261615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-023-01003-3 |
_version_ | 1785052612138106880 |
---|---|
author | Boeckxstaens, Lennert Pauwels, Elin Vandecaveye, Vincent Deckers, Wies Cleeren, Frederik Dekervel, Jeroen Vandamme, Timon Serdons, Kim Koole, Michel Bormans, Guy Laenen, Annouschka Clement, Paul M. Geboes, Karen Van Cutsem, Eric Nackaerts, Kristiaan Stroobants, Sigrid Verslype, Chris Van Laere, Koen Deroose, Christophe M. |
author_facet | Boeckxstaens, Lennert Pauwels, Elin Vandecaveye, Vincent Deckers, Wies Cleeren, Frederik Dekervel, Jeroen Vandamme, Timon Serdons, Kim Koole, Michel Bormans, Guy Laenen, Annouschka Clement, Paul M. Geboes, Karen Van Cutsem, Eric Nackaerts, Kristiaan Stroobants, Sigrid Verslype, Chris Van Laere, Koen Deroose, Christophe M. |
author_sort | Boeckxstaens, Lennert |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Fluorine-18-labeled SSAs have the potential to become the next-generation tracer in SSTR-imaging in neuroendocrine tumor (NET) patients given their logistical advantages over the current gold standard gallium-68-labeled SSAs. In particular, [(18)F]AlF-OC has already shown excellent clinical performance. We demonstrated in our previous report from our prospective multicenter trial that [(18)F]AlF-OC PET/CT outperforms [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSA, but histological confirmation was lacking due to ethical and practical reasons. In this second arm, we therefore aimed to provide evidence that the vast majority of [(18)F]AlF-OC PET lesions are in fact true NET lesions by analyzing their MR characteristics on simultaneously acquired MRI. We had a special interest in lesions solely detected by [(18)F]AlF-OC (“incremental lesions”). METHODS: Ten patients with a histologically confirmed neuroendocrine tumor (NET) and a standard-of-care [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT, performed within 3 months, were prospectively included. Patients underwent a whole-body PET/MRI (TOF, 3 T, GE Signa), 2 hours after IV injection of 4 MBq/kg [(18)F]AlF-OC. Positive PET lesions were evaluated for a corresponding lesion on MRI. The diagnostic performance of both PET tracers was evaluated by determining the detection ratio (DR) for each scan and the differential detection ratio (DDR) per patient. RESULTS: In total, 195 unique lesions were detected: 167 with [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTATATE and 193 with [(18)F]AlF-OC. The DR for [(18)F]AlF-OC was 99.1% versus 91.4% for [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTATATE, significant for non-inferiority testing (p = 0.0001). Out of these 193 [(18)F]AlF-OC lesions, 96.2% were confirmed by MRI to be NET lesions. Thirty-three incremental lesions were identified by [(18)F]AlF-OC, of which 91% were confirmed by MRI and considered true positives. CONCLUSION: The DR of [(18)F]AlF-OC was numerically higher and non-inferior to the DR of [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTATATE. [(18)F]AlF-OC lesions and especially incremental lesions were confirmed as true positives by MRI in more than 90% of lesions. Taken together, these data further validate [(18)F]AlF-OC as a new alternative for SSTR PET in clinical practice. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04552847. Registered 17 September 2020, https://beta.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04552847 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10235004 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102350042023-06-03 Prospective comparison of [(18)F]AlF-NOTA-octreotide PET/MRI to [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in neuroendocrine tumor patients Boeckxstaens, Lennert Pauwels, Elin Vandecaveye, Vincent Deckers, Wies Cleeren, Frederik Dekervel, Jeroen Vandamme, Timon Serdons, Kim Koole, Michel Bormans, Guy Laenen, Annouschka Clement, Paul M. Geboes, Karen Van Cutsem, Eric Nackaerts, Kristiaan Stroobants, Sigrid Verslype, Chris Van Laere, Koen Deroose, Christophe M. EJNMMI Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Fluorine-18-labeled SSAs have the potential to become the next-generation tracer in SSTR-imaging in neuroendocrine tumor (NET) patients given their logistical advantages over the current gold standard gallium-68-labeled SSAs. In particular, [(18)F]AlF-OC has already shown excellent clinical performance. We demonstrated in our previous report from our prospective multicenter trial that [(18)F]AlF-OC PET/CT outperforms [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSA, but histological confirmation was lacking due to ethical and practical reasons. In this second arm, we therefore aimed to provide evidence that the vast majority of [(18)F]AlF-OC PET lesions are in fact true NET lesions by analyzing their MR characteristics on simultaneously acquired MRI. We had a special interest in lesions solely detected by [(18)F]AlF-OC (“incremental lesions”). METHODS: Ten patients with a histologically confirmed neuroendocrine tumor (NET) and a standard-of-care [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT, performed within 3 months, were prospectively included. Patients underwent a whole-body PET/MRI (TOF, 3 T, GE Signa), 2 hours after IV injection of 4 MBq/kg [(18)F]AlF-OC. Positive PET lesions were evaluated for a corresponding lesion on MRI. The diagnostic performance of both PET tracers was evaluated by determining the detection ratio (DR) for each scan and the differential detection ratio (DDR) per patient. RESULTS: In total, 195 unique lesions were detected: 167 with [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTATATE and 193 with [(18)F]AlF-OC. The DR for [(18)F]AlF-OC was 99.1% versus 91.4% for [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTATATE, significant for non-inferiority testing (p = 0.0001). Out of these 193 [(18)F]AlF-OC lesions, 96.2% were confirmed by MRI to be NET lesions. Thirty-three incremental lesions were identified by [(18)F]AlF-OC, of which 91% were confirmed by MRI and considered true positives. CONCLUSION: The DR of [(18)F]AlF-OC was numerically higher and non-inferior to the DR of [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTATATE. [(18)F]AlF-OC lesions and especially incremental lesions were confirmed as true positives by MRI in more than 90% of lesions. Taken together, these data further validate [(18)F]AlF-OC as a new alternative for SSTR PET in clinical practice. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04552847. Registered 17 September 2020, https://beta.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04552847 Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10235004/ /pubmed/37261615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-023-01003-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Boeckxstaens, Lennert Pauwels, Elin Vandecaveye, Vincent Deckers, Wies Cleeren, Frederik Dekervel, Jeroen Vandamme, Timon Serdons, Kim Koole, Michel Bormans, Guy Laenen, Annouschka Clement, Paul M. Geboes, Karen Van Cutsem, Eric Nackaerts, Kristiaan Stroobants, Sigrid Verslype, Chris Van Laere, Koen Deroose, Christophe M. Prospective comparison of [(18)F]AlF-NOTA-octreotide PET/MRI to [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in neuroendocrine tumor patients |
title | Prospective comparison of [(18)F]AlF-NOTA-octreotide PET/MRI to [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in neuroendocrine tumor patients |
title_full | Prospective comparison of [(18)F]AlF-NOTA-octreotide PET/MRI to [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in neuroendocrine tumor patients |
title_fullStr | Prospective comparison of [(18)F]AlF-NOTA-octreotide PET/MRI to [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in neuroendocrine tumor patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Prospective comparison of [(18)F]AlF-NOTA-octreotide PET/MRI to [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in neuroendocrine tumor patients |
title_short | Prospective comparison of [(18)F]AlF-NOTA-octreotide PET/MRI to [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in neuroendocrine tumor patients |
title_sort | prospective comparison of [(18)f]alf-nota-octreotide pet/mri to [(68)ga]ga-dotatate pet/ct in neuroendocrine tumor patients |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10235004/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37261615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-023-01003-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boeckxstaenslennert prospectivecomparisonof18falfnotaoctreotidepetmrito68gagadotatatepetctinneuroendocrinetumorpatients AT pauwelselin prospectivecomparisonof18falfnotaoctreotidepetmrito68gagadotatatepetctinneuroendocrinetumorpatients AT vandecaveyevincent prospectivecomparisonof18falfnotaoctreotidepetmrito68gagadotatatepetctinneuroendocrinetumorpatients AT deckerswies prospectivecomparisonof18falfnotaoctreotidepetmrito68gagadotatatepetctinneuroendocrinetumorpatients AT cleerenfrederik prospectivecomparisonof18falfnotaoctreotidepetmrito68gagadotatatepetctinneuroendocrinetumorpatients AT dekerveljeroen prospectivecomparisonof18falfnotaoctreotidepetmrito68gagadotatatepetctinneuroendocrinetumorpatients AT vandammetimon prospectivecomparisonof18falfnotaoctreotidepetmrito68gagadotatatepetctinneuroendocrinetumorpatients AT serdonskim prospectivecomparisonof18falfnotaoctreotidepetmrito68gagadotatatepetctinneuroendocrinetumorpatients AT koolemichel prospectivecomparisonof18falfnotaoctreotidepetmrito68gagadotatatepetctinneuroendocrinetumorpatients AT bormansguy prospectivecomparisonof18falfnotaoctreotidepetmrito68gagadotatatepetctinneuroendocrinetumorpatients AT laenenannouschka prospectivecomparisonof18falfnotaoctreotidepetmrito68gagadotatatepetctinneuroendocrinetumorpatients AT clementpaulm prospectivecomparisonof18falfnotaoctreotidepetmrito68gagadotatatepetctinneuroendocrinetumorpatients AT geboeskaren prospectivecomparisonof18falfnotaoctreotidepetmrito68gagadotatatepetctinneuroendocrinetumorpatients AT vancutsemeric prospectivecomparisonof18falfnotaoctreotidepetmrito68gagadotatatepetctinneuroendocrinetumorpatients AT nackaertskristiaan prospectivecomparisonof18falfnotaoctreotidepetmrito68gagadotatatepetctinneuroendocrinetumorpatients AT stroobantssigrid prospectivecomparisonof18falfnotaoctreotidepetmrito68gagadotatatepetctinneuroendocrinetumorpatients AT verslypechris prospectivecomparisonof18falfnotaoctreotidepetmrito68gagadotatatepetctinneuroendocrinetumorpatients AT vanlaerekoen prospectivecomparisonof18falfnotaoctreotidepetmrito68gagadotatatepetctinneuroendocrinetumorpatients AT deroosechristophem prospectivecomparisonof18falfnotaoctreotidepetmrito68gagadotatatepetctinneuroendocrinetumorpatients |