Cargando…
Transanal drainage tube for the prevention of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: a meta−analysis of randomized controlled trials
BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a serious complication of anterior resection for rectal cancer. The use of transanal drainage tubes (TDT) during surgery to prevent AL remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10235681/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37274258 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1198549 |
_version_ | 1785052742366003200 |
---|---|
author | Xia, Shijun Wu, Wenjiang Ma, Lijuan Luo, Lidan Yu, Linchong Li, Yue |
author_facet | Xia, Shijun Wu, Wenjiang Ma, Lijuan Luo, Lidan Yu, Linchong Li, Yue |
author_sort | Xia, Shijun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a serious complication of anterior resection for rectal cancer. The use of transanal drainage tubes (TDT) during surgery to prevent AL remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine the efficacy of TDT in reducing AL. METHODS: Relevant data and studies published from inception until November 1, 2022, were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to compare the incidence of AL after anterior resection for rectal cancer with and without TDT. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included 5 RCTs comprising 1385 patients. The results showed that the intraoperative use of TDT could not reduce the incidence of AL after rectal cancer surgery (risk ratio [RR], 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52–1.59; p = 0.75). A subgroup analysis of different degrees of AL revealed that TDT did not reduce the incidence of postoperative grade B AL (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.67–2.09; p = 0.56) but decreased the incidence of grade C AL (RR, 0.28; 95% CI: 0.12–0.64; p = 0.003). Further, TDT did not reduce the incidence of AL in patients with rectal cancer and a stoma (RR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.01–5.71; p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: TDT were ineffective in reducing the overall incidence of AL, but they might be beneficial in reducing the incidence of grade C AL in patients who underwent anterior resection. However, additional multicenter RCTs with larger sample sizes based on unified control standards and TDT indications are warranted to validate these findings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10235681 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102356812023-06-03 Transanal drainage tube for the prevention of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: a meta−analysis of randomized controlled trials Xia, Shijun Wu, Wenjiang Ma, Lijuan Luo, Lidan Yu, Linchong Li, Yue Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a serious complication of anterior resection for rectal cancer. The use of transanal drainage tubes (TDT) during surgery to prevent AL remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine the efficacy of TDT in reducing AL. METHODS: Relevant data and studies published from inception until November 1, 2022, were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to compare the incidence of AL after anterior resection for rectal cancer with and without TDT. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included 5 RCTs comprising 1385 patients. The results showed that the intraoperative use of TDT could not reduce the incidence of AL after rectal cancer surgery (risk ratio [RR], 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52–1.59; p = 0.75). A subgroup analysis of different degrees of AL revealed that TDT did not reduce the incidence of postoperative grade B AL (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.67–2.09; p = 0.56) but decreased the incidence of grade C AL (RR, 0.28; 95% CI: 0.12–0.64; p = 0.003). Further, TDT did not reduce the incidence of AL in patients with rectal cancer and a stoma (RR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.01–5.71; p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: TDT were ineffective in reducing the overall incidence of AL, but they might be beneficial in reducing the incidence of grade C AL in patients who underwent anterior resection. However, additional multicenter RCTs with larger sample sizes based on unified control standards and TDT indications are warranted to validate these findings. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10235681/ /pubmed/37274258 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1198549 Text en Copyright © 2023 Xia, Wu, Ma, Luo, Yu and Li https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Xia, Shijun Wu, Wenjiang Ma, Lijuan Luo, Lidan Yu, Linchong Li, Yue Transanal drainage tube for the prevention of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: a meta−analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title | Transanal drainage tube for the prevention of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: a meta−analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full | Transanal drainage tube for the prevention of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: a meta−analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_fullStr | Transanal drainage tube for the prevention of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: a meta−analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Transanal drainage tube for the prevention of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: a meta−analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_short | Transanal drainage tube for the prevention of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: a meta−analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_sort | transanal drainage tube for the prevention of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: a meta−analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10235681/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37274258 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1198549 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiashijun transanaldrainagetubeforthepreventionofanastomoticleakageafterrectalcancersurgeryametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT wuwenjiang transanaldrainagetubeforthepreventionofanastomoticleakageafterrectalcancersurgeryametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT malijuan transanaldrainagetubeforthepreventionofanastomoticleakageafterrectalcancersurgeryametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT luolidan transanaldrainagetubeforthepreventionofanastomoticleakageafterrectalcancersurgeryametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT yulinchong transanaldrainagetubeforthepreventionofanastomoticleakageafterrectalcancersurgeryametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT liyue transanaldrainagetubeforthepreventionofanastomoticleakageafterrectalcancersurgeryametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |