Cargando…

Remote online open book examinations: through the lenses of faculty and students in health professions programmes

BACKGROUND: Open book examinations have been used to assess students’ higher order cognitive skills. These examinations can be conducted online remotely with the advancement of technology. However, there are concerns regarding its validity and reliability particularly if the examinations are not pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Er, Hui Meng, Wong, Pei Se, Nadarajah, Vishna Devi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10235823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37268906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04368-0
_version_ 1785052777721888768
author Er, Hui Meng
Wong, Pei Se
Nadarajah, Vishna Devi
author_facet Er, Hui Meng
Wong, Pei Se
Nadarajah, Vishna Devi
author_sort Er, Hui Meng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Open book examinations have been used to assess students’ higher order cognitive skills. These examinations can be conducted online remotely with the advancement of technology. However, there are concerns regarding its validity and reliability particularly if the examinations are not proctored. The objective of this study was to explore the perceptions of faculty and students in health professions programmes about remote online open book examinations (ROOBE). METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted among 22 faculty staff who were involved in ROOBE in health professions programmes. All interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using a thematic analysis approach. The perceptions of 249 medical students were obtained using an online questionnaire after they completed ROOBE. RESULTS: The faculty agreed that open book examinations could promote students’ higher order cognitive skills and reduce students’ stress. However, they were concerned about students’ academic integrity during non-invigilated ROOBE which could affect recognition by accreditation and professional bodies. The shift from traditional practice of closed-book examinations to ROOBE required change management with the support of guidelines and faculty training.  Majority of the students claimed that the examinations were challenging as they assessed their ability to apply knowledge in real world problems. Nevertheless, they preferred ROOBE due to less anxiety and memorisation, and more emphasis on problem solving skills. The shortcomings were insufficient time for information searching during examinations and uncertainty in preparedness for future practice as they focused less on memorisation of factual knowledge during examination preparation. Cheating among peers and internet instability during non-invigilated ROOBE were the concerns highlighted by some students. CONCLUSIONS: Faculty and students expressed favourable views about ROOBE in promoting higher order cognitive skills. Adequate technological support was essential during ROOBE. While there was a need to address issues related to academic integrity, ROOBE could be included as an authentic assessment within the systems of assessment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10235823
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102358232023-06-03 Remote online open book examinations: through the lenses of faculty and students in health professions programmes Er, Hui Meng Wong, Pei Se Nadarajah, Vishna Devi BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: Open book examinations have been used to assess students’ higher order cognitive skills. These examinations can be conducted online remotely with the advancement of technology. However, there are concerns regarding its validity and reliability particularly if the examinations are not proctored. The objective of this study was to explore the perceptions of faculty and students in health professions programmes about remote online open book examinations (ROOBE). METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted among 22 faculty staff who were involved in ROOBE in health professions programmes. All interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using a thematic analysis approach. The perceptions of 249 medical students were obtained using an online questionnaire after they completed ROOBE. RESULTS: The faculty agreed that open book examinations could promote students’ higher order cognitive skills and reduce students’ stress. However, they were concerned about students’ academic integrity during non-invigilated ROOBE which could affect recognition by accreditation and professional bodies. The shift from traditional practice of closed-book examinations to ROOBE required change management with the support of guidelines and faculty training.  Majority of the students claimed that the examinations were challenging as they assessed their ability to apply knowledge in real world problems. Nevertheless, they preferred ROOBE due to less anxiety and memorisation, and more emphasis on problem solving skills. The shortcomings were insufficient time for information searching during examinations and uncertainty in preparedness for future practice as they focused less on memorisation of factual knowledge during examination preparation. Cheating among peers and internet instability during non-invigilated ROOBE were the concerns highlighted by some students. CONCLUSIONS: Faculty and students expressed favourable views about ROOBE in promoting higher order cognitive skills. Adequate technological support was essential during ROOBE. While there was a need to address issues related to academic integrity, ROOBE could be included as an authentic assessment within the systems of assessment. BioMed Central 2023-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10235823/ /pubmed/37268906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04368-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Er, Hui Meng
Wong, Pei Se
Nadarajah, Vishna Devi
Remote online open book examinations: through the lenses of faculty and students in health professions programmes
title Remote online open book examinations: through the lenses of faculty and students in health professions programmes
title_full Remote online open book examinations: through the lenses of faculty and students in health professions programmes
title_fullStr Remote online open book examinations: through the lenses of faculty and students in health professions programmes
title_full_unstemmed Remote online open book examinations: through the lenses of faculty and students in health professions programmes
title_short Remote online open book examinations: through the lenses of faculty and students in health professions programmes
title_sort remote online open book examinations: through the lenses of faculty and students in health professions programmes
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10235823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37268906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04368-0
work_keys_str_mv AT erhuimeng remoteonlineopenbookexaminationsthroughthelensesoffacultyandstudentsinhealthprofessionsprogrammes
AT wongpeise remoteonlineopenbookexaminationsthroughthelensesoffacultyandstudentsinhealthprofessionsprogrammes
AT nadarajahvishnadevi remoteonlineopenbookexaminationsthroughthelensesoffacultyandstudentsinhealthprofessionsprogrammes