Cargando…

The likelihood of a healthy live birth after frozen embryo transfer with endometrium prepared by natural ovulation regimen vs programmed regimen: a propensity-score matching study

BACKGROUND: The number of frozen embryo transfer cycles is increasing, but the optimal method of endometrial preparation for frozen embryo transfer remains controversial. Few studies have investigated the healthy live birth outcome after the natural ovulation regimen vs the programmed regimen. OBJEC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Ze, Zhang, Yingxin, Shang, Xue, Miao, Ruolan, Yin, Mengfei, Yang, Huiming, Yu, Yunhai, Wei, Daimin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10236214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37275439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100210
_version_ 1785052865919713280
author Wang, Ze
Zhang, Yingxin
Shang, Xue
Miao, Ruolan
Yin, Mengfei
Yang, Huiming
Yu, Yunhai
Wei, Daimin
author_facet Wang, Ze
Zhang, Yingxin
Shang, Xue
Miao, Ruolan
Yin, Mengfei
Yang, Huiming
Yu, Yunhai
Wei, Daimin
author_sort Wang, Ze
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The number of frozen embryo transfer cycles is increasing, but the optimal method of endometrial preparation for frozen embryo transfer remains controversial. Few studies have investigated the healthy live birth outcome after the natural ovulation regimen vs the programmed regimen. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore whether the likelihood of a healthy live birth after frozen embryo transfer differs between the natural ovulation regimen and the programmed regimen. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including 7824 ovulatory women who underwent the first frozen embryo transfer cycle of single-blastocyst transfer with endometrial preparation by natural ovulation regimen vs programmed regimen, between June 2017 and June 2021. Propensity score matching was used to control for confounding variables in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was healthy live birth, defined as birth of a live, singleton infant born at term, with an appropriate birthweight for gestational age. RESULTS: The natural ovulation regimen resulted in a higher probability of achieving healthy live birth compared with the programmed regimen (35.8% vs 30.6%; P<.0001). In addition, a higher rate of singleton live birth was observed after the natural ovulation regimen relative to the programmed regimen (49.6% vs 45.7%; P=.003). Women with the natural ovulation regimen were also less likely to experience clinical pregnancy loss (16.0% vs 19.7%; P=.005) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (3.9% vs 6.0%; P=.004) compared with women with the programmed regimen. Singletons born after the programmed regimen had greater mean birthweight (3441.50±539.97 vs 3394.96±503.87; P=.020) and higher risk of being large for gestational age (23.3% vs 18.7%; P=.003) than those conceived after the natural ovulation regimen. CONCLUSION: The natural ovulation regimen may be superior to the programmed regimen with regard to higher likelihood of healthy live birth and lower risk of pregnancy loss and maternal hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10236214
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102362142023-06-03 The likelihood of a healthy live birth after frozen embryo transfer with endometrium prepared by natural ovulation regimen vs programmed regimen: a propensity-score matching study Wang, Ze Zhang, Yingxin Shang, Xue Miao, Ruolan Yin, Mengfei Yang, Huiming Yu, Yunhai Wei, Daimin AJOG Glob Rep Original Research BACKGROUND: The number of frozen embryo transfer cycles is increasing, but the optimal method of endometrial preparation for frozen embryo transfer remains controversial. Few studies have investigated the healthy live birth outcome after the natural ovulation regimen vs the programmed regimen. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore whether the likelihood of a healthy live birth after frozen embryo transfer differs between the natural ovulation regimen and the programmed regimen. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including 7824 ovulatory women who underwent the first frozen embryo transfer cycle of single-blastocyst transfer with endometrial preparation by natural ovulation regimen vs programmed regimen, between June 2017 and June 2021. Propensity score matching was used to control for confounding variables in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was healthy live birth, defined as birth of a live, singleton infant born at term, with an appropriate birthweight for gestational age. RESULTS: The natural ovulation regimen resulted in a higher probability of achieving healthy live birth compared with the programmed regimen (35.8% vs 30.6%; P<.0001). In addition, a higher rate of singleton live birth was observed after the natural ovulation regimen relative to the programmed regimen (49.6% vs 45.7%; P=.003). Women with the natural ovulation regimen were also less likely to experience clinical pregnancy loss (16.0% vs 19.7%; P=.005) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (3.9% vs 6.0%; P=.004) compared with women with the programmed regimen. Singletons born after the programmed regimen had greater mean birthweight (3441.50±539.97 vs 3394.96±503.87; P=.020) and higher risk of being large for gestational age (23.3% vs 18.7%; P=.003) than those conceived after the natural ovulation regimen. CONCLUSION: The natural ovulation regimen may be superior to the programmed regimen with regard to higher likelihood of healthy live birth and lower risk of pregnancy loss and maternal hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Elsevier 2023-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10236214/ /pubmed/37275439 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100210 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Wang, Ze
Zhang, Yingxin
Shang, Xue
Miao, Ruolan
Yin, Mengfei
Yang, Huiming
Yu, Yunhai
Wei, Daimin
The likelihood of a healthy live birth after frozen embryo transfer with endometrium prepared by natural ovulation regimen vs programmed regimen: a propensity-score matching study
title The likelihood of a healthy live birth after frozen embryo transfer with endometrium prepared by natural ovulation regimen vs programmed regimen: a propensity-score matching study
title_full The likelihood of a healthy live birth after frozen embryo transfer with endometrium prepared by natural ovulation regimen vs programmed regimen: a propensity-score matching study
title_fullStr The likelihood of a healthy live birth after frozen embryo transfer with endometrium prepared by natural ovulation regimen vs programmed regimen: a propensity-score matching study
title_full_unstemmed The likelihood of a healthy live birth after frozen embryo transfer with endometrium prepared by natural ovulation regimen vs programmed regimen: a propensity-score matching study
title_short The likelihood of a healthy live birth after frozen embryo transfer with endometrium prepared by natural ovulation regimen vs programmed regimen: a propensity-score matching study
title_sort likelihood of a healthy live birth after frozen embryo transfer with endometrium prepared by natural ovulation regimen vs programmed regimen: a propensity-score matching study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10236214/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37275439
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100210
work_keys_str_mv AT wangze thelikelihoodofahealthylivebirthafterfrozenembryotransferwithendometriumpreparedbynaturalovulationregimenvsprogrammedregimenapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT zhangyingxin thelikelihoodofahealthylivebirthafterfrozenembryotransferwithendometriumpreparedbynaturalovulationregimenvsprogrammedregimenapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT shangxue thelikelihoodofahealthylivebirthafterfrozenembryotransferwithendometriumpreparedbynaturalovulationregimenvsprogrammedregimenapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT miaoruolan thelikelihoodofahealthylivebirthafterfrozenembryotransferwithendometriumpreparedbynaturalovulationregimenvsprogrammedregimenapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT yinmengfei thelikelihoodofahealthylivebirthafterfrozenembryotransferwithendometriumpreparedbynaturalovulationregimenvsprogrammedregimenapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT yanghuiming thelikelihoodofahealthylivebirthafterfrozenembryotransferwithendometriumpreparedbynaturalovulationregimenvsprogrammedregimenapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT yuyunhai thelikelihoodofahealthylivebirthafterfrozenembryotransferwithendometriumpreparedbynaturalovulationregimenvsprogrammedregimenapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT weidaimin thelikelihoodofahealthylivebirthafterfrozenembryotransferwithendometriumpreparedbynaturalovulationregimenvsprogrammedregimenapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT wangze likelihoodofahealthylivebirthafterfrozenembryotransferwithendometriumpreparedbynaturalovulationregimenvsprogrammedregimenapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT zhangyingxin likelihoodofahealthylivebirthafterfrozenembryotransferwithendometriumpreparedbynaturalovulationregimenvsprogrammedregimenapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT shangxue likelihoodofahealthylivebirthafterfrozenembryotransferwithendometriumpreparedbynaturalovulationregimenvsprogrammedregimenapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT miaoruolan likelihoodofahealthylivebirthafterfrozenembryotransferwithendometriumpreparedbynaturalovulationregimenvsprogrammedregimenapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT yinmengfei likelihoodofahealthylivebirthafterfrozenembryotransferwithendometriumpreparedbynaturalovulationregimenvsprogrammedregimenapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT yanghuiming likelihoodofahealthylivebirthafterfrozenembryotransferwithendometriumpreparedbynaturalovulationregimenvsprogrammedregimenapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT yuyunhai likelihoodofahealthylivebirthafterfrozenembryotransferwithendometriumpreparedbynaturalovulationregimenvsprogrammedregimenapropensityscorematchingstudy
AT weidaimin likelihoodofahealthylivebirthafterfrozenembryotransferwithendometriumpreparedbynaturalovulationregimenvsprogrammedregimenapropensityscorematchingstudy