Cargando…

Resolution rates in clinical trials for microbiota restoration for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Microbiota restoration is highly effective to treat recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in observational studies (cure rates >90%) but efficacy in controlled clinical trials appears to be lower. OBJECTIVES: To perform an updated meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tariq, Raseen, Pardi, Darrell S., Khanna, Sahil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10236242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37274301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562848231174293
_version_ 1785052873939222528
author Tariq, Raseen
Pardi, Darrell S.
Khanna, Sahil
author_facet Tariq, Raseen
Pardi, Darrell S.
Khanna, Sahil
author_sort Tariq, Raseen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Microbiota restoration is highly effective to treat recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in observational studies (cure rates >90%) but efficacy in controlled clinical trials appears to be lower. OBJECTIVES: To perform an updated meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of microbiota restoration for recurrent CDI in open-label registered prospective clinical trials compared to randomized controlled trials (RCTs). DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. DATA SOURCES AND METHODS: A systematic search of various databases was performed up to July 2022 to identify studies of interest. Clinical trials of microbiota restoration for recurrent CDI with clinical resolution with one dose were included. We calculated weighted pooled rates (WPRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: In all, 19 clinical trials with 1176 recurrent CDI patients were included. Of the patients treated with microbiota restoration, 897 experienced a clinical cure with a single microbiota restoration therapy (WPR, 78%; 95% CI, 71–85%). There was significant heterogeneity among studies with an I(2) of 88%. Analysis of trials with a control arm (non-microbiota restoration) revealed CDI resolution in 373 of 523 patients (WPR, 72%; 95% CI, 60–82%) with microbiota restoration. Among the nine open-label clinical trials, CDI resolution was seen in 524 of 653 patients after initial microbiota restoration (WPR, 84%; 95% CI, 74–92%). Comparison of resolution rates between RCTs and open-label trials revealed a lower cure rate in RCTs compared to open-label trials (WPR, 73 versus 84%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Microbiota restoration in a randomized controlled setting leads to lower resolution rates compared to open label and observational settings, likely due to stricter definitions and inclusion criteria. Resolution rates in open-label studies were similar to observational studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10236242
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102362422023-06-03 Resolution rates in clinical trials for microbiota restoration for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis Tariq, Raseen Pardi, Darrell S. Khanna, Sahil Therap Adv Gastroenterol Meta-Analysis BACKGROUND: Microbiota restoration is highly effective to treat recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in observational studies (cure rates >90%) but efficacy in controlled clinical trials appears to be lower. OBJECTIVES: To perform an updated meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of microbiota restoration for recurrent CDI in open-label registered prospective clinical trials compared to randomized controlled trials (RCTs). DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. DATA SOURCES AND METHODS: A systematic search of various databases was performed up to July 2022 to identify studies of interest. Clinical trials of microbiota restoration for recurrent CDI with clinical resolution with one dose were included. We calculated weighted pooled rates (WPRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: In all, 19 clinical trials with 1176 recurrent CDI patients were included. Of the patients treated with microbiota restoration, 897 experienced a clinical cure with a single microbiota restoration therapy (WPR, 78%; 95% CI, 71–85%). There was significant heterogeneity among studies with an I(2) of 88%. Analysis of trials with a control arm (non-microbiota restoration) revealed CDI resolution in 373 of 523 patients (WPR, 72%; 95% CI, 60–82%) with microbiota restoration. Among the nine open-label clinical trials, CDI resolution was seen in 524 of 653 patients after initial microbiota restoration (WPR, 84%; 95% CI, 74–92%). Comparison of resolution rates between RCTs and open-label trials revealed a lower cure rate in RCTs compared to open-label trials (WPR, 73 versus 84%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Microbiota restoration in a randomized controlled setting leads to lower resolution rates compared to open label and observational settings, likely due to stricter definitions and inclusion criteria. Resolution rates in open-label studies were similar to observational studies. SAGE Publications 2023-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10236242/ /pubmed/37274301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562848231174293 Text en © The Author(s), 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Meta-Analysis
Tariq, Raseen
Pardi, Darrell S.
Khanna, Sahil
Resolution rates in clinical trials for microbiota restoration for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
title Resolution rates in clinical trials for microbiota restoration for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Resolution rates in clinical trials for microbiota restoration for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Resolution rates in clinical trials for microbiota restoration for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Resolution rates in clinical trials for microbiota restoration for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Resolution rates in clinical trials for microbiota restoration for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort resolution rates in clinical trials for microbiota restoration for recurrent clostridioides difficile infection: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10236242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37274301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562848231174293
work_keys_str_mv AT tariqraseen resolutionratesinclinicaltrialsformicrobiotarestorationforrecurrentclostridioidesdifficileinfectionanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pardidarrells resolutionratesinclinicaltrialsformicrobiotarestorationforrecurrentclostridioidesdifficileinfectionanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT khannasahil resolutionratesinclinicaltrialsformicrobiotarestorationforrecurrentclostridioidesdifficileinfectionanupdatedsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis