Cargando…

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment + chemotherapy (vs. chemotherapy alone) for locally advanced non‑small cell lung cancer: A retrospective cohort study

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment + chemotherapy has been used for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, evidence regarding the efficacy of this treatment is insufficient, particularly in Chinese patients. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Yi, Liu, Zaoyang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10236247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37274484
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2023.13878
_version_ 1785052875459657728
author Yang, Yi
Liu, Zaoyang
author_facet Yang, Yi
Liu, Zaoyang
author_sort Yang, Yi
collection PubMed
description Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment + chemotherapy has been used for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, evidence regarding the efficacy of this treatment is insufficient, particularly in Chinese patients. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant ICI treatment + chemotherapy compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone for locally advanced NSCLC. For this, 50 patients with locally advanced NSCLC were retrospectively analyzed; of these, 23 patients received pre-operative camrelizumab or sintilimab + chemotherapy (ICI + chemo group) and 27 patients received pre-operative chemotherapy alone (chemo group). The objective response rate (73.9 vs. 44.4%, P=0.035) was superior in the ICI + chemo group compared with the chemo group. Nevertheless, surgical resection rate (100.0 vs. 88.9%, P=0.240), major pathological response (60.9 vs. 41.7%, P=0.188) and complete pathological response (CPR; 30.4 vs. 8.3%, P=0.072) were not significantly different in the ICI + chemo group compared with the chemo group. Following adjustment, ICI + chemo was independently associated with an elevated CPR (P=0.029). Disease-free survival (DFS) was prolonged in the ICI + chemo group compared with the chemo group (1-year DFS, 94.1 vs. 81.6%; 2-year DFS, 80.7 vs. 42.9%; P=0.047), while no significant differences were observed in overall survival (OS; 1-year OS, 100.0 vs. 95.7%; 2-year OS, 90.0 vs. 64.9%; P=0.187). Additionally, the majority of adverse event incidences (apart from leukopenia) did not differ significantly between the ICI + chemo and chemo groups (all P>0.050). On the whole, the present study demonstrated that neoadjuvant ICI treatment + chemotherapy exhibited adequate efficacy and acceptable toxicity compared with chemotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced NSCLC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10236247
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102362472023-06-03 Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment + chemotherapy (vs. chemotherapy alone) for locally advanced non‑small cell lung cancer: A retrospective cohort study Yang, Yi Liu, Zaoyang Oncol Lett Articles Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment + chemotherapy has been used for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, evidence regarding the efficacy of this treatment is insufficient, particularly in Chinese patients. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant ICI treatment + chemotherapy compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone for locally advanced NSCLC. For this, 50 patients with locally advanced NSCLC were retrospectively analyzed; of these, 23 patients received pre-operative camrelizumab or sintilimab + chemotherapy (ICI + chemo group) and 27 patients received pre-operative chemotherapy alone (chemo group). The objective response rate (73.9 vs. 44.4%, P=0.035) was superior in the ICI + chemo group compared with the chemo group. Nevertheless, surgical resection rate (100.0 vs. 88.9%, P=0.240), major pathological response (60.9 vs. 41.7%, P=0.188) and complete pathological response (CPR; 30.4 vs. 8.3%, P=0.072) were not significantly different in the ICI + chemo group compared with the chemo group. Following adjustment, ICI + chemo was independently associated with an elevated CPR (P=0.029). Disease-free survival (DFS) was prolonged in the ICI + chemo group compared with the chemo group (1-year DFS, 94.1 vs. 81.6%; 2-year DFS, 80.7 vs. 42.9%; P=0.047), while no significant differences were observed in overall survival (OS; 1-year OS, 100.0 vs. 95.7%; 2-year OS, 90.0 vs. 64.9%; P=0.187). Additionally, the majority of adverse event incidences (apart from leukopenia) did not differ significantly between the ICI + chemo and chemo groups (all P>0.050). On the whole, the present study demonstrated that neoadjuvant ICI treatment + chemotherapy exhibited adequate efficacy and acceptable toxicity compared with chemotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced NSCLC. D.A. Spandidos 2023-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10236247/ /pubmed/37274484 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2023.13878 Text en Copyright: © Yang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Yang, Yi
Liu, Zaoyang
Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment + chemotherapy (vs. chemotherapy alone) for locally advanced non‑small cell lung cancer: A retrospective cohort study
title Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment + chemotherapy (vs. chemotherapy alone) for locally advanced non‑small cell lung cancer: A retrospective cohort study
title_full Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment + chemotherapy (vs. chemotherapy alone) for locally advanced non‑small cell lung cancer: A retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment + chemotherapy (vs. chemotherapy alone) for locally advanced non‑small cell lung cancer: A retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment + chemotherapy (vs. chemotherapy alone) for locally advanced non‑small cell lung cancer: A retrospective cohort study
title_short Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment + chemotherapy (vs. chemotherapy alone) for locally advanced non‑small cell lung cancer: A retrospective cohort study
title_sort neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment + chemotherapy (vs. chemotherapy alone) for locally advanced non‑small cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10236247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37274484
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2023.13878
work_keys_str_mv AT yangyi neoadjuvantimmunecheckpointinhibitortreatmentchemotherapyvschemotherapyaloneforlocallyadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceraretrospectivecohortstudy
AT liuzaoyang neoadjuvantimmunecheckpointinhibitortreatmentchemotherapyvschemotherapyaloneforlocallyadvancednonsmallcelllungcanceraretrospectivecohortstudy