Cargando…

Personalized 3D-printed amniotic fornical ring for ocular surface reconstruction

In the present work, we used three-dimensional (3D) printing technology to make a polylactic acid (PLA) amniotic fornical ring (AFR) for ocular surface reconstruction. This work is a retrospective and interventional case series of patients with ocular surface diseases who underwent either personaliz...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Nan, Liu, Ruixing, Liu, Xiaowu, Hou, Songlin, Dou, Runan, Geng, Xingchen, Li, Yan, Li, Jingguo, Zhu, Lei, Li, Zhanrong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10236349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37273984
http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/ijb.713
_version_ 1785052900008919040
author Zhang, Nan
Liu, Ruixing
Liu, Xiaowu
Hou, Songlin
Dou, Runan
Geng, Xingchen
Li, Yan
Li, Jingguo
Zhu, Lei
Li, Zhanrong
author_facet Zhang, Nan
Liu, Ruixing
Liu, Xiaowu
Hou, Songlin
Dou, Runan
Geng, Xingchen
Li, Yan
Li, Jingguo
Zhu, Lei
Li, Zhanrong
author_sort Zhang, Nan
collection PubMed
description In the present work, we used three-dimensional (3D) printing technology to make a polylactic acid (PLA) amniotic fornical ring (AFR) for ocular surface reconstruction. This work is a retrospective and interventional case series of patients with ocular surface diseases who underwent either personalized 3D-printed AFR-assisted amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) or sutured AMT (SAMT). Patient epidemiology, treatment, operative duration, epithelial healing time, retention time, vision changes, morbidity, and costs were analyzed. Thirty-one patients (40 eyes) and 19 patients (22 eyes) were enrolled in the 3D-printed AFR group and the SAMT group, respectively. The clinical indications of AFR and SAMT were similar, such as corneal and/or conjunctival epithelial defects due to chemical burns, thermal burns, Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS), or toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). The mean dissolution time was 15 ± 11 days in the AFR group, compared with 14 ± 7 days in the SAMT group. The percentage of healed corneal area was 90.91% (66.10%–100.00%) for AFR and 93.67% (60.23%–100.00%) for SAMT. The median time for corneal epithelial healing was 14 (7–75) days in the AFR group and 30 (14–55) days in the suture AMT group. There were no significant differences in the initial visual acuity, final visual acuity, or improvement in visual acuity between the two groups. The operation duration in the AFR group was significantly shorter than that in the SAMT group. Regarding the cost analysis, the average cost per eye in the AFR group was significantly lower than that in the SAMT group. Furthermore, 3D-printed and sterile AFR showed no obvious side effects on the eyes. Our results suggested that 3D-printed PLA scaffolds could be used as an AFR device for ocular surface disease. In addition, personalized 3D-printed AFR is superior to conventional AMT in operation duration and cost effectiveness, thereby reducing the financial burden on our health care system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10236349
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102363492023-06-03 Personalized 3D-printed amniotic fornical ring for ocular surface reconstruction Zhang, Nan Liu, Ruixing Liu, Xiaowu Hou, Songlin Dou, Runan Geng, Xingchen Li, Yan Li, Jingguo Zhu, Lei Li, Zhanrong Int J Bioprint Research Article In the present work, we used three-dimensional (3D) printing technology to make a polylactic acid (PLA) amniotic fornical ring (AFR) for ocular surface reconstruction. This work is a retrospective and interventional case series of patients with ocular surface diseases who underwent either personalized 3D-printed AFR-assisted amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) or sutured AMT (SAMT). Patient epidemiology, treatment, operative duration, epithelial healing time, retention time, vision changes, morbidity, and costs were analyzed. Thirty-one patients (40 eyes) and 19 patients (22 eyes) were enrolled in the 3D-printed AFR group and the SAMT group, respectively. The clinical indications of AFR and SAMT were similar, such as corneal and/or conjunctival epithelial defects due to chemical burns, thermal burns, Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS), or toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). The mean dissolution time was 15 ± 11 days in the AFR group, compared with 14 ± 7 days in the SAMT group. The percentage of healed corneal area was 90.91% (66.10%–100.00%) for AFR and 93.67% (60.23%–100.00%) for SAMT. The median time for corneal epithelial healing was 14 (7–75) days in the AFR group and 30 (14–55) days in the suture AMT group. There were no significant differences in the initial visual acuity, final visual acuity, or improvement in visual acuity between the two groups. The operation duration in the AFR group was significantly shorter than that in the SAMT group. Regarding the cost analysis, the average cost per eye in the AFR group was significantly lower than that in the SAMT group. Furthermore, 3D-printed and sterile AFR showed no obvious side effects on the eyes. Our results suggested that 3D-printed PLA scaffolds could be used as an AFR device for ocular surface disease. In addition, personalized 3D-printed AFR is superior to conventional AMT in operation duration and cost effectiveness, thereby reducing the financial burden on our health care system. Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd. 2023-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10236349/ /pubmed/37273984 http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/ijb.713 Text en Copyright: © 2023, Zhang N, Liu R, Liu X, et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Nan
Liu, Ruixing
Liu, Xiaowu
Hou, Songlin
Dou, Runan
Geng, Xingchen
Li, Yan
Li, Jingguo
Zhu, Lei
Li, Zhanrong
Personalized 3D-printed amniotic fornical ring for ocular surface reconstruction
title Personalized 3D-printed amniotic fornical ring for ocular surface reconstruction
title_full Personalized 3D-printed amniotic fornical ring for ocular surface reconstruction
title_fullStr Personalized 3D-printed amniotic fornical ring for ocular surface reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Personalized 3D-printed amniotic fornical ring for ocular surface reconstruction
title_short Personalized 3D-printed amniotic fornical ring for ocular surface reconstruction
title_sort personalized 3d-printed amniotic fornical ring for ocular surface reconstruction
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10236349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37273984
http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/ijb.713
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangnan personalized3dprintedamnioticfornicalringforocularsurfacereconstruction
AT liuruixing personalized3dprintedamnioticfornicalringforocularsurfacereconstruction
AT liuxiaowu personalized3dprintedamnioticfornicalringforocularsurfacereconstruction
AT housonglin personalized3dprintedamnioticfornicalringforocularsurfacereconstruction
AT dourunan personalized3dprintedamnioticfornicalringforocularsurfacereconstruction
AT gengxingchen personalized3dprintedamnioticfornicalringforocularsurfacereconstruction
AT liyan personalized3dprintedamnioticfornicalringforocularsurfacereconstruction
AT lijingguo personalized3dprintedamnioticfornicalringforocularsurfacereconstruction
AT zhulei personalized3dprintedamnioticfornicalringforocularsurfacereconstruction
AT lizhanrong personalized3dprintedamnioticfornicalringforocularsurfacereconstruction